O$U - Ouch!

Talk about the Buckeyes the Wolverines the Hilltoppers the Ducks the Beavers the Chanticleers... or anyone else who isn't BG or an opponent in this forum.
User avatar
tekekini
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1900
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: O-H-I-O

Post by tekekini »

Jacobs4Heisman wrote:
tekekini wrote: But, I also find it interesting how everyone accuses OSU of being some big giant cheater. They were in ZERO violations for football and ZERO probation. The one violation was not against the school just the players. and NOTHING came from the NCAA on Clarrett. which would ahve been against the player anyways and not the school.

The only ONE from OSU was basketball and it was jsut a one year probation.

BG has 0 at the moment. WOW OSU is so horrible arent they? :roll:

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=2319357


A highlight from the story:

The university has conceded to nine violations, seven in the men's basketball program and one each for the women's basketball and football teams.


I thought you knew everything about OSU?
That is a question mark still...and nothing has been decided that was when o'brien was here, and he admitted it too late and they fired him . The one mentioned in that article for football team i believe was the Troy Smith $500 incident from a booster not the university.

The womens BBall team has to dea l with a dentist giving girlsd free dental work again, not the universities doing.

All they are doing is deciding if the punishments the university laid out for each player and o'brien was enough


None of that is new. the 7 for the basketball team are from 1 event. O'Brien was a F' up and he is gone. time to move on
User avatar
BGDrew
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 6355
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 2:11 pm
Contact:

Post by BGDrew »

tekekini wrote:according to Dayons article....just 1 There are 7 in question with the bball team which the university has already punished the team for, The NCAA did nothing about it.
Oh, so one's ok then?
Check out our new BGSU hockey site: http://www.bgsuhockey.com
User avatar
tekekini
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1900
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: O-H-I-O

Post by tekekini »

BGDrew wrote:
tekekini wrote:according to Dayons article....just 1 There are 7 in question with the bball team which the university has already punished the team for, The NCAA did nothing about it.
Oh, so one's ok then?
no but its on 24 like you people make it sound
User avatar
Jacobs4Heisman
a.k.a. Capt. Rex Kramer
a.k.a. Capt. Rex Kramer
Posts: 7889
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: Aliquippa, PA

Post by Jacobs4Heisman »

Okay -- this time I'll say it slowly.

The University has conceded to nine violations.

The university is conceding them but you're not? They should hire you to be AD.
Roll Along!
Spart43
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 507
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 9:38 am
Location: Loveland, Ohio

Post by Spart43 »

[quote="tekekini]

Its all stupidity on the players behavior and has nothing to do with the university athletics cheating. [/quote]

The players are a direct reflection of the university. This shows what type of players they are recruiting. You cannot release the university from its responsibilty when its players do something stupid, the university is the one that brought them there. Same with alumni.
Image
Guest

Post by Guest »

Spart43 wrote:[quote="tekekini]

Its all stupidity on the players behavior and has nothing to do with the university athletics cheating.
The players are a direct reflection of the university. This shows what type of players they are recruiting. You cannot release the university from its responsibilty when its players do something stupid, the university is the one that brought them there. Same with alumni.[/quote]

They can not control what the players do. They can tell them what they can or can not do but they cant control wether the player actually listens or takes it to heart. Its a fault within the player. The players are trying to impress to get to the schools. Once they get there their real sides show.

The coaches/university doesnt get that good of an idea what the kids are like.
e a job
sure they take character witnesses from friends or family, but they arent going to tell the whole truth. Some kids get there and dont know how to handle the spotlight and that is NOT smething that you can expect the university to predict.

if you were a poor football player not allowed to have a job and someone offers you $500 for no reason you are going to think about it. Most kids turn it down (smart) but some have character flaws and take it.
Guest

Post by Guest »

Jacobs4Heisman wrote:Okay -- this time I'll say it slowly.

The University has conceded to nine violations.

The university is conceding them but you're not? They should hire you to be AD.
Yes, I said seven of them were from the same event (O'brien giving a "recruit" $5000 who wasnt even going to be eligble to play anywhere in the NCAA).

one was troy smith taking 500 from a booster.

one free dental work for lady bball player(s)

7+1+1 = 9

The troy smith incident was an individual mistake the booster had nothing to do with OSU except owning a seat license which was taken away and he has been banned from university grounds. This is old news, The NCAA did not punish the university. The university punished the player. The university still has to report it and the NCAA has to decide if thepunishment was tough enough. The violation was against a player not a institution. they have to admit something was done wrong, even though not on institution level.

Same with the dental work.

The other ONE event equaled 7 different violations. The coach is gone and the player was "ineligible" to play because he was a pro n Euro ball. This is a BS situation. But I can see the argument from both sides..the kid was clearly ineligible. but they did attempt to appeal to have his eligibility reinstated.

the other 2 are minor. O'brien was the only major...The NCAA is not investigating anything. just deciding if all self imposed punishments were enough.



When something is wrong, they dont hide it like FSU or Miami, they make it known. They punish their teams or players who do violate without waiting on the NCAA to do it for them.

If OSU wanted to cheat so bad, they would try to cover it up. They do not. That is the biggest point.

Get over it fellas, they are not as bad as you think
User avatar
Bleeding Orange
The Abominable Desert 'Cat
The Abominable Desert 'Cat
Posts: 7065
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:06 pm
Location: Searching for a home, via Chicago...
Contact:

Post by Bleeding Orange »

Anonymous wrote:
Spart43 wrote:[quote="tekekini]

Its all stupidity on the players behavior and has nothing to do with the university athletics cheating.
The players are a direct reflection of the university. This shows what type of players they are recruiting. You cannot release the university from its responsibilty when its players do something stupid, the university is the one that brought them there. Same with alumni.
They can not control what the players do. They can tell them what they can or can not do but they cant control wether the player actually listens or takes it to heart. Its a fault within the player. The players are trying to impress to get to the schools. Once they get there their real sides show.

The coaches/university doesnt get that good of an idea what the kids are like.
e a job
sure they take character witnesses from friends or family, but they arent going to tell the whole truth. Some kids get there and dont know how to handle the spotlight and that is NOT smething that you can expect the university to predict.

if you were a poor football player not allowed to have a job and someone offers you $500 for no reason you are going to think about it. Most kids turn it down (smart) but some have character flaws and take it.[/quote]

First of all, if a school recruits character, they get character. OSU fans always wonder why they get crap for Maurice Clarett when he only played there for a year, but the fact of the matter is, OSU recruited him. They wanted him to be a part of their program, and a major face for it. Like it or not, whenever Maurice has a run-in with the law (which he may not again for 30 years or so...), it is going to reflect poorly upon OSU and their football program.

Second, yes, some kids do have some character flaws which cause them to take bribes. Thats a give - 18-22 year old kids do a lot of stupid, thoughtless things (I know I did my share during those years). BUT, people want to place all of the blame on these kids and the boosters who lured them in, when reality, it is the athletic departments at Universities that are really to blame. When an AD is not informing its boosters of NCAA regulations (and all AD's know who their boosters are - follow the money trail...), a lot of those boosters are not going to know what they can and can not do. Bowling Green, for example, makes every effort possible to inform its boosters of NCAA regulations not only for current student athletes, but prospective student athletes, as well. I have been privy to many of these efforts myself. And, as a result of these efforts, boosters for BGSU (and yes, we do have many of them - what a surprise!), BGSU has run a very, very clean program for quite some time now.
From the halls of ivy...

It is not my intention to do away with government. It is rather to make it work - work with us, not over us; stand by our side, not ride on our back. Government can and must provide opportunity, not smother it; foster productivity, not stifle it. ~Ronald Reagan

Image

:smt117
Guest

Post by Guest »

Bleeding Orange wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Spart43 wrote:[quote="tekekini]

Its all stupidity on the players behavior and has nothing to do with the university athletics cheating.
The players are a direct reflection of the university. This shows what type of players they are recruiting. You cannot release the university from its responsibilty when its players do something stupid, the university is the one that brought them there. Same with alumni.
They can not control what the players do. They can tell them what they can or can not do but they cant control wether the player actually listens or takes it to heart. Its a fault within the player. The players are trying to impress to get to the schools. Once they get there their real sides show.

The coaches/university doesnt get that good of an idea what the kids are like.
e a job
sure they take character witnesses from friends or family, but they arent going to tell the whole truth. Some kids get there and dont know how to handle the spotlight and that is NOT smething that you can expect the university to predict.

if you were a poor football player not allowed to have a job and someone offers you $500 for no reason you are going to think about it. Most kids turn it down (smart) but some have character flaws and take it.
First of all, if a school recruits character, they get character. OSU fans always wonder why they get crap for Maurice Clarett when he only played there for a year, but the fact of the matter is, OSU recruited him. They wanted him to be a part of their program, and a major face for it. Like it or not, whenever Maurice has a run-in with the law (which he may not again for 30 years or so...), it is going to reflect poorly upon OSU and their football program.

When an AD is not informing its boosters of NCAA regulations (and all AD's know who their boosters are - follow the money trail...), a lot of those boosters are not going to know what they can and can not do. Bowling Green, for example, makes every effort possible to inform its boosters of NCAA regulations not only for current student athletes, but prospective student athletes, as well. I have been privy to many of these efforts myself. And, as a result of these efforts, boosters for BGSU (and yes, we do have many of them - what a surprise!), BGSU has run a very, very clean program for quite some time now.[/quote]

Thats great and all but OSU does the same thing. They hold a classes every summer or fall I believe that all athletes and boosters MUST attend to go over the very same thngs that the BG boosters do as you have said.

This was a big part of why they had banned this guy from the university for life. He was on the attendance roster for these classes, he was there. This was noted all up and down the news when the troy smith incident happened.

The university does in fact provide the same typ of deal that BG does with boosters AND players.

They take every step possible to prevent the kids from doing the stupid mistakes and the boosters too. At this point is it not beyond the institutions scope? At this point is it not all on the players and boosters to behave?

This is why I believe it is bogus for things like this to be reflected back on the university so poorly by media, and well, you guys too.

I can see why the Jim O'briend scandal deal was made to such a big deal. That one is obvious but you need to give the university AD some props on how to handle it. I think they handled it well. The only thing that the institution did wrong was to hire a coach who turned out to make a mistake (which everyone makes mistakes). The only thing the NCAA is discussing is to see if the punishment OSU gave itself was enough. It is no longer abig deal, i imagine the NCAA will say the team is fine.

I disagree about clarrett still reflecting bad on OSU. I believe that most people do not associtae him with them too much. Yes, when they mention his arrests on the news they say former osu running back, but no one really cares. Everyone knows who he was. I think most people sit there and think about how he ruined his whole life on his own. How he had all the talent in the world and was primed for the big time and all he had to do was be patient because he money was comming. Now he is poor and has to mug people. Everything he is doing is all him.

Does USC look bad because OJ murders people? They recruited him! But nobody cares where he went to school.

The Troy Smith incident, I believe reflects on how well OSU handles situations more than it reflects bad on the university. As mentioned above Troy and the booster attended the same type of classes/seminars whatever you want to call it. The incident still happened and they punished both of them for it. The booster got it the worst because he definately should know better. Troy was just breaking out, had just kicked michigans ass, he had not grown up yet and didnt quite know how o handle the sudden fame he was getting.

We can all sit here and tell him how bad he was for that and dog on him until he is gone but if you were in the same situation you would atleast think about it and hope no one knew about it. If you say you wouldnt then you are a liar.

My point is that people blow these incidents way out of proportion. They see the NCAA is getting involved and think these are big deals. They are not. The ncaa is going to say how well they did in handling them and no NCAA punishments will be handed down.

If it was really cheating then, they could have not suspended Troy, let him play in the Alamo Bowl that year, waited until the summer and hope it was never caught and if it was then deal with the NCAA. It never even got close to that. Smith was suspended faster than you can say the word. O'Brien was fired in less than a week of his incident. They didnt wait for any invesitagtions to even start. Good job!

These 9 incidents that J4H is so hard up about talking about have nothing to do with cheating. they are about poor judegemnt and character flaws on players and a coach who was fired.

Troy has grown up now, I believe. You can see it in his interviews, how he acts on the field as a leader. He has a new found trust in his coaches and players and he is ready to take it a step up this year. Tresell has done a good job turning this kid into somethng, wether you want to believe it or not.
User avatar
Jacobs4Heisman
a.k.a. Capt. Rex Kramer
a.k.a. Capt. Rex Kramer
Posts: 7889
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: Aliquippa, PA

Post by Jacobs4Heisman »

I'm not the one that brought this up -- I'm just countering the assertion that there has been only one violation.
Roll Along!
User avatar
tekekini
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1900
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: O-H-I-O

Post by tekekini »

Jacobs4Heisman wrote:I'm not the one that brought this up -- I'm just countering the assertion that there has been only one violation.
thats cool man, but when I said that i was referring to the site that Dayons posted that said ONE. obviously that had not counted the ones recently.

My point when I said that OSU had only ONE and BG had ZERO
is that OSU has not always been as bad as everyone here thinks. They are not cheaters.

And my point now is that they are still not bad. They report their issues and they do not hide them. They punish themselves instead of waiting for the NCAA to do it which would lead to tougher punishments more than likely. They DO notify boosters, and all players of the rules.

Thats my point. They do not cheat, they are not as bad as you make them out to be
Post Reply