NCAA Play-in game

BGSU Men's Basketball!!
Post Reply
transfer2BGSU
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 5829
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:50 am
Location: Jed's, Myle's Pizza, Corner Grill

NCAA Play-in game

Post by transfer2BGSU »

Should the play-in game involve automatic tourney bid winners or just at-large teams?

The past couple of years, teams that won their conference tournament and received an automatic bid have played in Dayton. Why not make two at-large teams play for the right to play in the tournament?
"The name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back" -Herb Brooks
User avatar
TG1996
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 12708
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 3:27 am
Location: Indianapolis
Contact:

Re: NCAA Play-in game

Post by TG1996 »

transfer2BGSU wrote:Should the play-in game involve automatic tourney bid winners or just at-large teams?

The past couple of years, teams that won their conference tournament and received an automatic bid have played in Dayton. Why not make two at-large teams play for the right to play in the tournament?
Seems like that would make sense, but I don't think we'd like the results of how they'd do it. First off, they'd never put a major school in a play-in game. Or definitely not match two of them up. So that leaves it as mid-majors playing in, and making the tourney as an at-large mid-major, to me at least, means that you've earned the right in the regular season to not have to play an extra game come tournament time.

I guess they could always use their "last four in" idea to decide who plays, but I'd bet that would also get skewed away from the big boys as well.
"I don't believe I can name a coach, anywhere, anytime, anyhow, who did it better than Doyt Perry."
-1955 BG Assistant Bo Schembechler

BGSUsports.com - Where ESPN.com goes for BG history.
User avatar
Schadenfreude
Professional tractor puller
Professional tractor puller
Posts: 6983
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
Location: Colorado

Re: NCAA Play-in game

Post by Schadenfreude »

transfer2BGSU wrote:The past couple of years, teams that won their conference tournament and received an automatic bid have played in Dayton. Why not make two at-large teams play for the right to play in the tournament?[/color]
Because the two worst teams in the NCAA tournament are always conference tournament winners.
San Diego Falcon
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:26 pm

Post by San Diego Falcon »

Strange thought - what if Dayton had a terrible year (say 6-23 in regular season), but won the A-10 tourney? They'd get to host the play-in game, or do the rules of nobody hosting a 1st or 2nd round game also apply to this game? Move the game to the Nutter Center? Dayton gets to be one of the #16 seeds that skips the play-in game? :-k
"but when you look at ths team beyond the suck , you see a glorious future again" - MACMAN
User avatar
It's the Journey...
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 2347
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 10:17 pm
Location: Bowling Green, Ohio

Post by It's the Journey... »

The "play-in game" is crap. If they can have one play in game why not have one for each region and make the field 68 teams? All 4 games could be played on the Wednesday after selection Sunday and then the field is set for Thursday.
"If all do not join now to save the good old ship of the Union this voyage nobody will have a chance to pilot her on another voyage."
A. Lincoln


The BGSU Men's Chorus
America's Finest Singing Machine
BGSU Brothers Sing On

Charge on Colts, Charge on!

"ROLL ALONG!"
User avatar
Schadenfreude
Professional tractor puller
Professional tractor puller
Posts: 6983
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
Location: Colorado

Post by Schadenfreude »

It's the Journey... wrote:The "play-in game" is crap.
They did it because the number of conferences with automatic bids rose from 30 to 31, and it was thought better to have a play-in game than eliminate an at-large bid.

I believe this happened when the WAC gave birth to the Mountain West.
Post Reply