Hmm wonder why that could be...Rollo83 wrote:Zips shot 63% for the half, including 53% from 3-point. Every team we play shoots the 3 like they never have before or will again.
@ Akron (3/5)
Re: @ Akron (3/5)
Re: @ Akron (3/5)
Austin was in because fields and Lester both had two fouls. Plus, no one else has been able to guard him so I'm ok with next man up. I wonder if they switch Turner on to him in the second half, but they have Ivey and Cheese that will still need guarded.mbenecke wrote:It would have been contested a lot harder if we had 6'2 Fields or 6'4 Turner on him instead of 5'9 DeAndre Austin.hammb wrote:Then we give up a (actually contested) 3 to finish the half.
Seriously Akron is an awful offensive basketball team but we just have up a 44 point half? Brutal...
I like seeing walk-ons get playing time, but not when it doesn't make sense, situationally speaking.
LONG LIVE THE MONGOOSE!!
Re: @ Akron (3/5)
That's fair. I hadn't noticed that Fields picked up his second.Matty B wrote:Austin was in because fields and Lester both had two fouls. Plus, no one else has been able to guard him so I'm ok with next man up. I wonder if they switch Turner on to him in the second half, but they have Ivey and Cheese that will still need guarded.mbenecke wrote:It would have been contested a lot harder if we had 6'2 Fields or 6'4 Turner on him instead of 5'9 DeAndre Austin.hammb wrote:Then we give up a (actually contested) 3 to finish the half.
Seriously Akron is an awful offensive basketball team but we just have up a 44 point half? Brutal...
I like seeing walk-ons get playing time, but not when it doesn't make sense, situationally speaking.
Lillard on Cheese, Plowden on Ivey, Turner on Jackson?
BGSU '20
Re: @ Akron (3/5)
We're 9 seconds into the 2nd half and Wiggins has already given up the easiest three point play opportunity you will ever see. I love his talent, he truly just doesn't seem to have any fire or passion in his game, and it makes him just look soft out there.
BGSU '20
Re: @ Akron (3/5)
Now down 50-37. Awful start to the 2nd half. Disappointing effort all night.
BGSU '20
Re: @ Akron (3/5)
We look like hell.
This team can look so good and so bad from game to game
This team can look so good and so bad from game to game
Re: @ Akron (3/5)
And even within one game.hammb wrote:We look like hell.
This team can look so good and so bad from game to game
Under-16, down 57-45. Losing interest in this one fast.
BGSU '20
Re: @ Akron (3/5)
Asgood as this season has been (and to this point it is absolutely a success) I still don't think he can coach. Good coaches don't have their teams show up without defensive effort this frequently, and they certainly don't put up with the horrible offensive execution and shot selection that follows on our bad defensive nights.Matty B wrote:2 turnovers, 4 Akron layups, 0 huger timeouts
- Globetrotter
- Turbo

- Posts: 11320
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:17 am
Re: @ Akron (3/5)
No fire
No defense.
This team gave up weeks ago
No defense.
This team gave up weeks ago
- Globetrotter
- Turbo

- Posts: 11320
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:17 am
Re: @ Akron (3/5)
Hypothetical because he deserves another year. You get one option. Extend or fire Huger? I think the correct option is obvious.
- Globetrotter
- Turbo

- Posts: 11320
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:17 am
Re: @ Akron (3/5)
Didn’t we used to rebound well?
Re: @ Akron (3/5)
Deficit was up to 15, but now it's 17. Playing way harder on defense right now. This is how this team should ALWAYS play - no plays off.
BGSU '20
Re: @ Akron (3/5)
If it has to happen right now, he gets an extension. There's 0 way a coach takes you to your first bye in a decade, sets a Stroh record for home wins, and wins 20 games, then gets fired.Globetrotter wrote:Hypothetical because he deserves another year. You get one option. Extend or fire Huger? I think the correct option is obvious.
BGSU '20


