vs. Carlow (12/21)
- Globetrotter
- Turbo

- Posts: 11320
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:17 am
Re: vs. Carlow (12/21)
Can't Etim play a certain number of games and not eat his redshirt. Isn't Watson a walk on too?
Re: vs. Carlow (12/21)
Globe I tried to get you banned years ago when you claimed Gadsen a stud. It didn't work.
- footballguy51
- Peregrine

- Posts: 3025
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 5:19 pm
Re: vs. Carlow (12/21)
Metheny isn’t on the bench today that I can tell. Watson isn’t dressed, so there’s no way he’s going in. As for Etim, I think you are right about redshirt rules. I’d like to see him play unless he’s hurt.Globetrotter wrote: ↑Tue Dec 21, 2021 1:26 pm Can't Etim play a certain number of games and not eat his redshirt. Isn't Watson a walk on too?
ROLL ALONG!!!
- Diemilkweed
- Peregrine

- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2017 10:20 pm
Re: vs. Carlow (12/21)
There was a time, way back in the day, when if you looked at our stats from anyone but us they would only include D1 games. So team averages, player averages, etc... would not even reflect a game like this.
It should still be that way. This was utterly pointless.
It should still be that way. This was utterly pointless.
Re: vs. Carlow (12/21)
Falcons win 129-50 to finish non-conference play at 7-4.
Time to get ready for the MAC.
Time to get ready for the MAC.
BGSU '20
Re: vs. Carlow (12/21)
What bothered me was paying 5 dollars for a 4 by 4 inch Jet's pizza square.hammb wrote: ↑Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:24 amThe game is at noon on a Tuesday.
Most of us are paying to NOT watch it.
Unsure if that is better or worse.
They pull this bullshit every year with the scheduling. Every year I say, "man I may just skip season tickets this year, life is hectic, etc." Then my kid asks if we're going to the basketball games, and I know I'd miss it like hell if I didn't, and here we are. This is BG Athletics to a "T". Many businesses would treat their loyal customers better to keep them loyal. BG treats us like we'll keep paying no matter what so why should they care....and they're largely right![]()
SAme old Same old
