There are three schools I know for sure that did it across the board for all coaches that did not have an expiring contract (which, aside from football, is typically only head coaches). One is in the ACC, one in the Big 12, and one in Conference USA. I'm not sure what the disclosures were. At least one of them also implemented a 10% furlough, and that was one of the "rewards" or whatever to make up for it (did BG ever do a furlough? No, right?). Also, frankly, each of those schools has a donor base where the money can be found for a buyout if needed. Two of the football coaches have an overall losing record. I don't feel like looking into basketball records right now, but they aren't exactly powerhouses.guest44 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 11:47 am At those other schools did they disclose the contract extensions? At those other schools did they only do it in the sport with a endowment? Did they do it in sports where the coach has a losing record in conference?
What schools specifically in which sports?
With a couple of the others I know of, I only know of extensions for coaches in the "revenue" sports, which includes football, men's and women's basketball, and baseball for at least one of them.
Again, I am not saying I agree with the extension, just that there was a precedent set and it's clear that BG just went along with that.


