BG/Akron...

[BleedOrange]

I agree. I would love to see Chauncey and Sealey play the 2 and the 3 at the same time. But taking Orr out for Sealey would just be counterproductive. And I am not sure where you have seen Sealey shoot on the perimeter. He has shot 8 three's in his 3 year career and has made two. And to say that Orr hasn't demonstrated he's a better shooter is just false. He is a career 40% shooter. With that average being higher this season. He is a career 36% shooter from behind the arc and he is a career 77% FT shooter. With that average being close to 90% this year. Chauncey is and always will be a better shooter than Craig. Shooting is simply not Sealey's game whatsoever. In no way should Craig be playing ahead of him.

With that being said, Craig still can add a lot to this team and he should be playing 25+ minutes, I agree with that completely. But to say Chauncey hasn't demonstrated he can shoot is just silly. Look at the stats, he has shot very very well. And his numbers this season are very good.

I guess we simply disagree on Orr v. Sealey. So be it.

[BleedOrange]

But my first post in this threat called for a lineup of Crawford-Orr-Sealey-Calhoun-Holmes. I guess we just disagree on some minor details. But man, that lineup would be so much fun. I'd even go as far as saying we would have a significant better record (Nothing Crazy) with this lineup. Subbing in guys like Henderson, Clarke and Black to spare Holmes and Calhoun and as a foul trouble sub. Most really good teams only give 5-7 guys solid minutes with everyone else being bench warmers are guys with very limited roles. But for reasons no one knows, guys like Black/Kraus and Erger continue to see pretty solid minuets. Kraus and Black especially.

I'm with you on this. Early on, I was hoping that Clarke would play ahead of Crawford. Now, I wonder about the reliability of his ballhandling.

Spencer Parker looked good in some of the videos and is reported to have a good all-around skill set.

[hammb]

But my first post in this threat called for a lineup of Crawford-Orr-Sealey-Calhoun-Holmes. I guess we just disagree on some minor details. But man, that lineup would be so much fun. I'd even go as far as saying we would have a significant better record (Nothing Crazy) with this lineup. Subbing in guys like Henderson, Clarke and Black to spare Holmes and Calhoun and as a foul trouble sub. Most really good teams only give 5-7 guys solid minutes with everyone else being bench warmers are guys with very limited roles. But for reasons no one knows, guys like Black/Kraus and Erger continue to see pretty solid minuets. Kraus and Black especially.

I'm with you on this. Early on, I was hoping that Clarke would play ahead of Crawford. Now, I wonder about the reliability of his ballhandling.

Spencer Parker looked good in some of the videos and is reported to have a good all-around skill set.

Parker played some in garbage time a few weeks back (don't remember which game). He scored 4 or 6 points or something real quick. He looked like he immediately had far more game than Erger or Kraus already...yet those guys play every game and Parker has barely left the bench since.

[Globetrotter]

My doubt that he gets fired this year is at 5% and shrinking. I just don't see any real way that he can be brought back. I have completely lost interest in watching games even.

[hammb]

My doubt that he gets fired this year is at 5% and shrinking. I just don't see any real way that he can be brought back. I have completely lost interest in watching games even.

So have I. And I have season tickets, so I still go. I sit there and bullshit and use it as hangout time with friends more than anything. Last couple games I find myself barely even paying attention to what's happening on the court.

[factman]

+1