This season has been a season of opposites for our basketball teams, a guys team struggling to win games, and a girls team beating up on everybody. But where does this leave us in terms of the MAC conference as a whole? With all the negativity that has gripped this board of late, some of it my personal doing, I think we need some good news. Take a look at this. These are the combined conference records (through Wednesday) of every MAC schools men's and women's basketball teams.
MAC Basketball 2005-06 Combined Standings:
1.Kent State, 23-6
2.Bowling Green 19-10
3.Western Michigan 18-11
4.Northern Illinois 16-13
5.Miami 15-13
6.Eastern Michigan 15-14
7.Akron 13-15
8.Ohio 14-16
9.Ball State 13-16
10.Toledo 11-18
11.Fuffalo 10-19
12.Central Michigan 7-22
Wow. 2nd place, that's pretty good. Now that I see this, there's no need to be so negative about things. Gee, just think if our men can put up a few more wins here before the end we could come close to catching Kent for the top spot.
Best MAC Basketball Schools
-
bgsufalcon24
- Peregrine
- Posts: 4072
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 1:46 pm
- Location: Strongsville, Ohio
-
redskins4ever
- Peregrine
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:11 pm
- Location: Columbus, OH
-
bgsufalcon24
- Peregrine
- Posts: 4072
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 1:46 pm
- Location: Strongsville, Ohio
It's so crazy I just might do that too come April and May once baseball really hits the meat of the schedule. Besides, what are you saying? That the numbers don't matter?redskins4ever wrote:why statistics mean nothing...
why not combine the baseball team... the football team and the basketball team to see who has the best mens programs???
-
redskins4ever
- Peregrine
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:11 pm
- Location: Columbus, OH
I am saying that you are taking an undefeated womens team and putting it with a mediocre mens basketball team and one has nothing to do with the other...
you want a better statistical analysis of men's and women's programs look at a ten year snap shot... not just one year. This is why I love pounding on liberal tree hugging idiots about the earth is heating up... it really isn't because we haven't had a large enough statistical sample to look at, and two if anything since 1900 the largest changes in average temperature have been 1/10 of a degree or in some cases there are cities where it is colder then it was 100 years ago.
Sample size is very important.
you want a better statistical analysis of men's and women's programs look at a ten year snap shot... not just one year. This is why I love pounding on liberal tree hugging idiots about the earth is heating up... it really isn't because we haven't had a large enough statistical sample to look at, and two if anything since 1900 the largest changes in average temperature have been 1/10 of a degree or in some cases there are cities where it is colder then it was 100 years ago.
Sample size is very important.
-
BleedOrange
- Falcon Hoops Lifer
- Posts: 3064
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 9:51 pm
- Location: Fairlawn, Ohio
redskins4ever wrote:I am saying that you are taking an undefeated womens team and putting it with a mediocre mens basketball team and one has nothing to do with the other...
you want a better statistical analysis of men's and women's programs look at a ten year snap shot... not just one year. This is why I love pounding on liberal tree hugging idiots about the earth is heating up... it really isn't because we haven't had a large enough statistical sample to look at, and two if anything since 1900 the largest changes in average temperature have been 1/10 of a degree or in some cases there are cities where it is colder then it was 100 years ago.
Sample size is very important.
Hey, give this kid a break. He's just a freshman.
