Is This Just a Cycle in the MAC?
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 5:14 pm
Much like football, it seems each school takes a turn being thee TEAM to beat in MAC basketball. Maybe BG is just going through a period that all schools are going to go through?
I took a look at the original MAC member schools and what they have done the last 15 years in conference play...
Ball State
Champs in 1993
From 2001 through 2006 they have never finished above .500 in the league (5 year span)
Central Michigan
Champs in 2003
1990-2002 they were never above .500 in league (12 years)
The have won a total of 7 MAC games the last three years
Eastern Michigan
Champs in 1991 & 1996
From 1999 through 2006 they have finished near the bottom of the conference just above or below .500
Kent State
Champs in 2001, 2002, 2003 & 2005
From 1990 through 1997 they were never above .500 in league (8 years)
Miami
Champs in 1992, 1994, 1997, 1999
From 2000 through 2003 they were a .500 team in league play
Ohio
Champs in 1994 (Made NCAA in 2005)
They were 3-15 in 1998 and from 2003 through 2004 they were below .500
Toledo
No season championships!
From 1990 through 1997 they were over .500 only once
Western Michigan
Champs in 1998 & 2004
From 1990 through 2001 they were over .500 only twice
Bowling Green
Champs in 2000
From 1990 through 2002 they were under .500 only twice.
Of course we are all aware of what the last three or four seasons has been like at BG. But, maybe this is just a cycle that our program is going to have to fight through? Miami has probably been the most consistent team over the last 15 years in the MAC. And, Kent has had a nice run lately and has been able to sustain it for 5 or 6 years.
Now, does a change in coaching create these peaks and valleys? Probably plays a big part of it. But I wonder if the long-tenured coaches who weather a couple of stormy years don't end up winning again?
Not a vote to keep our current coaching situation, just wondering if some of this can't be helped with any program...no matter who's coaching?
I took a look at the original MAC member schools and what they have done the last 15 years in conference play...
Ball State
Champs in 1993
From 2001 through 2006 they have never finished above .500 in the league (5 year span)
Central Michigan
Champs in 2003
1990-2002 they were never above .500 in league (12 years)
The have won a total of 7 MAC games the last three years
Eastern Michigan
Champs in 1991 & 1996
From 1999 through 2006 they have finished near the bottom of the conference just above or below .500
Kent State
Champs in 2001, 2002, 2003 & 2005
From 1990 through 1997 they were never above .500 in league (8 years)
Miami
Champs in 1992, 1994, 1997, 1999
From 2000 through 2003 they were a .500 team in league play
Ohio
Champs in 1994 (Made NCAA in 2005)
They were 3-15 in 1998 and from 2003 through 2004 they were below .500
Toledo
No season championships!
From 1990 through 1997 they were over .500 only once
Western Michigan
Champs in 1998 & 2004
From 1990 through 2001 they were over .500 only twice
Bowling Green
Champs in 2000
From 1990 through 2002 they were under .500 only twice.
Of course we are all aware of what the last three or four seasons has been like at BG. But, maybe this is just a cycle that our program is going to have to fight through? Miami has probably been the most consistent team over the last 15 years in the MAC. And, Kent has had a nice run lately and has been able to sustain it for 5 or 6 years.
Now, does a change in coaching create these peaks and valleys? Probably plays a big part of it. But I wonder if the long-tenured coaches who weather a couple of stormy years don't end up winning again?
Not a vote to keep our current coaching situation, just wondering if some of this can't be helped with any program...no matter who's coaching?