Page 1 of 1
UT vs. Miami (OH)
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 9:03 pm
by jacojdm
Is anyone watching this game? Toledo has had about 10 chances to take the lead in the last five minutes, but they can't do it.
Does Charlie own another outfit besides his gray suit with red mock turtleneck?
Why is he unable to fully shave his upper lip?
Did the Jesus Twins' decision to attend Miami (OH) seal Coach D's fate?
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 9:11 pm
by BGGrad01
Classic finish with Miami running the same play twice with Pollitz running wide open both times. The inbounds guy actually opened his eyes the second time.
Was the story with those kids that DD wanted Tim, but not Eric? Tim is a really solid player, but Eric was scary with the ball at times during the second half.
Looking forward to the Kent/Akron game. Should be a very good one.
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 9:22 pm
by Rightupinthere
It was a heck of a game to watch.
Charlie needs to come to grips with the fact that he's balding and he doesn't look good with a caterpillar on his lip. He's a good coach, however.
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:09 pm
by cowboyjoe
Toledo could be the first MAC regular season champion to never be mentioned for an at-large bid. They were 2-8 against teams with RPI under 100 and 17-4 against teams over 100. The line tonight was Miami, Oh -1...that's right, the number 4 seed favored over the regular season champion of the league. Wow!
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:30 pm
by falconfan1999
Regardless, it's always a great pleasure to watch Toledo fall on it's collective face!
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:44 pm
by Jacobs4Heisman
cowboyjoe wrote:Toledo could be the first MAC regular season champion to never be mentioned for an at-large bid. They were 2-8 against teams with RPI under 100 and 17-4 against teams over 100. The line tonight was Miami, Oh -1...that's right, the number 4 seed favored over the regular season champion of the league. Wow!
The uncertainty surrounding Toledo's leading scorer's foot was probably worth a couple points at least.
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:50 pm
by UTRIPLETS
Falling on our collective faces? Wow. 3 and 13 must really be hard to take if winning the MAC regular season, having the coach of the year, and winning 25 of 29 MAC games a fall on our face.
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:21 pm
by Flipper
And yet your season ended just a couple of days after ours...
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:11 am
by theziggies
Flip (if I may call you that),
The Rockets' season is not over. They will play in an NIT game next week.
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 7:35 am
by Flipper
That's not a sure thing by any stretch, zig. The NIT field has been condensed this year and they have some rather large strikes against them (RPI, OOC and final record, didn't make conference tourney finals and their top scorer is hurt).
If Miami beats Akron in the final, there's no way they get in as the NIT would likely take Kent State and /or Akron ahead of them
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 7:59 am
by brewer
Actually, they are indeed guaranteed an NIT bid. This is the second year that the NIT guarantees bids to any post season eligible D1 teams that win their conference regular season and fail to make the NCAA tournament.
http://www.nit.org/about-nit/selection-procedures.html
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:22 am
by Flipper
WHoops...I did not know that
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:49 am
by Schadenfreude
brewer wrote:Actually, they are indeed guaranteed an NIT bid. This is the second year that the NIT guarantees bids to any post season eligible D1 teams that win their conference regular season and fail to make the NCAA tournament.
http://www.nit.org/about-nit/selection-procedures.html
That's a great rule.
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:42 pm
by h2oville rocket
brewer wrote:Actually, they are indeed guaranteed an NIT bid. This is the second year that the NIT guarantees bids to any post season eligible D1 teams that win their conference regular season and fail to make the NCAA tournament.
http://www.nit.org/about-nit/selection-procedures.html
Darn, Flipper! I wanted to be the one to post this!