Ay-Ziggy-Zoomba.com

A little comparison.

Kraus 27.4Minutes 4.8ppg 2.4rpg 2.0apg 1.4spg 0.6tpg .24FG% .778FT% .158 3%
Clarke 16.4Minutes 4.4ppg 3.6rpg 2.4apg 1.2spg 2.0tpg .29FG% .750FT% .250 3%

The only issue that I see is the turnovers. Otherwise he is either doing more with less or comparably.

Both stat lines look pretty awful to me.

guest44 wrote:Both stat lines look pretty awful to me.

Thats true

Where is the stat for "gritty, tough, defender"?

Dayons_Den wrote:Where is the stat for "gritty, tough, defender"?

fiesty

Bullshit. Clarke's stat-line is Clarke's full time equivalent would be roughly 9ppg and 5apg and 7rpg and 3spg!!!


What I think is out-right scandalous is Orr seeing major minutes ahead of Sealey.

Or that Erger replaces Orr more often before Sealey has removed his warmup.

BleedOrange wrote:Bullshit. Clarke's stat-line is Clarke's full time equivalent would be roughly 9ppg and 5apg and 7rpg and 3spg!!!


What I think is out-right scandalous is Orr seeing major minutes ahead of Sealey.

Not sure who you are calling Bullshit to.

However, it would be tough to show Sealey should be playing, somewhat out of position at the 3 instead of 4(although I would try it atleast) based off the comparison of their stats so far this year.

Calling bullshit on the idea that Clarke's stat line is bad, not that it matters much.

Globe, I've seen Sealey play. I've seen Clarke play. Their talents are obvious, as opposed to Orr and Kraus's. I don't care about 3 games worth of stats. Statistically, it's not significant. (Stats 101).

Five games. And I agree that sealed And Clarke are much more physically gifted. I just don't think Orr is that bad