Page 1 of 1
First Power Rankings of the Year
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:23 am
by jscottfitzwater
Re: First Power Rankings of the Year
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:45 am
by factman
Hey........we're #11.......... we're #11.....we're #11!!!!!!!!!
Re: First Power Rankings of the Year
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:55 am
by guest44
DIRECTIONALLY, we only have 1 way to go. #FireOrr
Re: First Power Rankings of the Year
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:49 pm
by BleedOrange
11. Bowling Green (6-9, 1-1)
There are multiple players on the roster who should not be playing Division I, yet they are. Only two players are shooting 45% or better from the floor, and both play less than 20 minutes a game. Yes, BG beat EMU (or perhaps “didn’t lose” is more appropriate, considering that abomination of a game), but I still think this team is worse. What is the justification for Luke Kraus playing 22.3 minutes a game while shooting 18.9% from the field and 9.1% from...
GOD YES. It's nice to see a non-BG person make the same observations.
Re: First Power Rankings of the Year
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:55 pm
by guest44
I read a stat today that Holmes has more blocks himself than the entire Miami team and by a few. He doesn't start on a 6-9 team. Orr is not a good coach, and he has a really poor staff around him. #FireOrr
Re: First Power Rankings of the Year
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 7:49 pm
by kdog27
I played with better players at the rec than kraus and I imagine that would still be the case.
Re: First Power Rankings of the Year
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:04 am
by BleedOrange
guest44 wrote:I read a stat today that Holmes has more blocks himself than the entire Miami team and by a few. He doesn't start on a 6-9 team. Orr is not a good coach, and he has a really poor staff around him. #FireOrr
We've seen this time and time again. Sealey, Clarke, and Holmes sit behind inferior players who have been proven non-winners and non-D1 players. Oglesby sat being Cam Black. Dee Brown was a full time player.
Re: First Power Rankings of the Year
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:19 am
by Globetrotter
BleedOrange wrote:11. Bowling Green (6-9, 1-1)
There are multiple players on the roster who should not be playing Division I, yet they are. Only two players are shooting 45% or better from the floor, and both play less than 20 minutes a game. Yes, BG beat EMU (or perhaps “didn’t lose” is more appropriate, considering that abomination of a game), but I still think this team is worse. What is the justification for Luke Kraus playing 22.3 minutes a game while shooting 18.9% from the field and 9.1% from...
GOD YES. It's nice to see a non-BG person make the same observations.
To me it seemed pretty clear that either someone from here wrote that or they got their information by looking here. Regardless, I think it was a bit over the top in that forum.