BG vs EMU
Re: BG vs EMU
BG down 7 early. 19-12
Re: BG vs EMU
Not a single foul on either team in the 1st 10 minutes.
Re: BG vs EMU
The bad BG team showed up tonight.
32% FG
70% FT
33% 3pt
10 Turnovers
Fortunately Matt Fox hit a couple 3's to keep it in reach.
Eastern hasn't attempted a FT
And behind 36-29 @ half
32% FG
70% FT
33% 3pt
10 Turnovers
Fortunately Matt Fox hit a couple 3's to keep it in reach.
Eastern hasn't attempted a FT
And behind 36-29 @ half
Re: BG vs EMU
I don't know if I've ever seen a more pathetic effort against a zone defense. My god we're inept.
And this coming from somebody who has watched a lot of years software BG struggling against zone. Our only hope is to start jacking 3s every possession and hope we shoot some ungodly percentage. All we are capable of doing if we try to pass is turnovers after turnovers
And this coming from somebody who has watched a lot of years software BG struggling against zone. Our only hope is to start jacking 3s every possession and hope we shoot some ungodly percentage. All we are capable of doing if we try to pass is turnovers after turnovers
Re: BG vs EMU
6 min scoreless drought to open the 2nd half.
Re: BG vs EMU
This leads into my main issue with Huger, and also with Orr when he was here. Huger( and Orr) preaches defense, defense, defense. And yes, defense is a huge part of the game, but you also need to be able to shoot and score the ball. You can be a great defensive team, but at some point you're going to need to be able to score. The name of the game is to outscore the opponent. I don't understand why Orr never addressed the offense of issues and Huger seems to almost follow in his footsteps in that regard.hammb wrote:I don't know if I've ever seen a more pathetic effort against a zone defense. My god we're inept.
And this coming from somebody who has watched a lot of years software BG struggling against zone. Our only hope is to start jacking 3s every possession and hope we shoot some ungodly percentage. All we are capable of doing if we try to pass is turnovers after turnovers
GO BG!!!
Re: BG vs EMU
Pathetic performance tonight.
Re: BG vs EMU
1 step forward, 200 steps back. No energy, no adjustments, and Wes and coach getting into it toward the end.
Re: BG vs EMU
BGSU33 wrote:This leads into my main issue with Huger, and also with Orr when he was here. Huger( and Orr) preaches defense, defense, defense. And yes, defense is a huge part of the game, but you also need to be able to shoot and score the ball. You can be a great defensive team, but at some point you're going to need to be able to score. The name of the game is to outscore the opponent. I don't understand why Orr never addressed the offense of issues and Huger seems to almost follow in his footsteps in that regard.hammb wrote:I don't know if I've ever seen a more pathetic effort against a zone defense. My god we're inept.
And this coming from somebody who has watched a lot of years software BG struggling against zone. Our only hope is to start jacking 3s every possession and hope we shoot some ungodly percentage. All we are capable of doing if we try to pass is turnovers after turnovers
We all saw what championship level coaching looked like. It had nearly none of these types of game. Unfortunately, it only lasted a year.
-
FalconTurf
- Peregrine

- Posts: 1490
- Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 9:37 pm
Re: BG vs EMU
Not sure what game everyone was watching but what I saw was an EMU team that was 3 or more inches taller and 20 or more pounds heavier at no less that 3 positions (usually 4) with more bounce in their jump and quickness in their feet. I would suggest these attributes made it easier to score, to pass and to handle the ball along with better defense.
The key tonight was our Falcons needed to play a perfect game and did not come close to that standard.
The key moving forward is we need bigger, stronger, faster athletes that have basketball skills. I see promise but we need more size to say the least.
The key tonight was our Falcons needed to play a perfect game and did not come close to that standard.
The key moving forward is we need bigger, stronger, faster athletes that have basketball skills. I see promise but we need more size to say the least.
I proudly chose to be a Falcon and a Falcon I will remain until the end.
-
FalconTurf
- Peregrine

- Posts: 1490
- Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 9:37 pm
Re: BG vs EMU
1. EMU preaches defense and they kicked butt with it tonight.BGSU33 wrote:This leads into my main issue with Huger, and also with Orr when he was here. Huger( and Orr) preaches defense, defense, defense. And yes, defense is a huge part of the game, but you also need to be able to shoot and score the ball. You can be a great defensive team, but at some point you're going to need to be able to score. The name of the game is to outscore the opponent. I don't understand why Orr never addressed the offense of issues and Huger seems to almost follow in his footsteps in that regard.hammb wrote:I don't know if I've ever seen a more pathetic effort against a zone defense. My god we're inept.
And this coming from somebody who has watched a lot of years software BG struggling against zone. Our only hope is to start jacking 3s every possession and hope we shoot some ungodly percentage. All we are capable of doing if we try to pass is turnovers after turnovers
2. The offense under Orr same as the offense under Huger - that is ridiculous. Coach Huger is owed an apology.
3. Bad passes and bad hands on the offensive end killed any chance of running anything and that's not completely a coaching issue, players need to step up. It also relates to the athletes they had creating rushed opportunities.
4. EMU rotated to backside block and cut off so many opportunities. If we had the athletes that could do what they did I would be thrilled.
I proudly chose to be a Falcon and a Falcon I will remain until the end.
Re: BG vs EMU
Yeah I'm not seeing any similarities between huger and Orr on offense at all. Orr's teams never averaged even 67 ppg and we're often content to just kill the shot clock every possession. We averaged 70 last year and are at 74 this year. Granted the change to 30 second shot click likely effects that some but not by 4+ ppg. Really struggled looking for points per 100 possession stats for college so cannot compare that...
Where I will agree is that huger doesn't seem to have an offensive system per se. We seem to rely on pushing tempo, and guys winning their individual matchups to score. Still it's far more aggressive than anything under Orr anf we get to the line a ton on most nights. Now whether we actually make them is another story.
Our issue tonight was largely emu forced. They have the perfect team for the zone they play. They're long and athletic. But all too often we didn't attack it. We didn't make quick passes, instead looking like we were thinking before making the nextpass. As a result we never really got their zone to move around.
When we did make passes it was like our guys all had butter on their fingers.
It was a bad sign from the very first possession when we got 3 in bounds plays because every pass we tried was tipped oob.
It really looked like our only plan to beat the zone tonight was to beat it down the floor. We did push tempo a lot, but it just led to quick misses and turn overseading to easy buckets on the other side. Hell they had almost as many points in the Paint the as we had total points.
Where I will agree is that huger doesn't seem to have an offensive system per se. We seem to rely on pushing tempo, and guys winning their individual matchups to score. Still it's far more aggressive than anything under Orr anf we get to the line a ton on most nights. Now whether we actually make them is another story.
Our issue tonight was largely emu forced. They have the perfect team for the zone they play. They're long and athletic. But all too often we didn't attack it. We didn't make quick passes, instead looking like we were thinking before making the nextpass. As a result we never really got their zone to move around.
When we did make passes it was like our guys all had butter on their fingers.
It was a bad sign from the very first possession when we got 3 in bounds plays because every pass we tried was tipped oob.
It really looked like our only plan to beat the zone tonight was to beat it down the floor. We did push tempo a lot, but it just led to quick misses and turn overseading to easy buckets on the other side. Hell they had almost as many points in the Paint the as we had total points.
-
HoopsFan
- Peregrine

- Posts: 1131
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:40 pm
- Location: Quietly living in Central Ohio
Re: BG vs EMU
Well, this game was F'ugly. Boys among men, I think everyone in the center had 7' wingspans and #10, who didn't start got his 19 points on easy baskets and 6-6 at the line.
It was frustrating to watch since they seemed to be moving a lot of North to South instead of East to West. Hey, the Stroh court runs E-W.
Fortunately, we don't go to Ypsi this year. Ish and 'Twon were very quiet.
HoopsFan
It was frustrating to watch since they seemed to be moving a lot of North to South instead of East to West. Hey, the Stroh court runs E-W.
Fortunately, we don't go to Ypsi this year. Ish and 'Twon were very quiet.
HoopsFan
- Globetrotter
- Turbo

- Posts: 11321
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:17 am
Re: BG vs EMU
100% agree. Where is the credit given to Eastern? They were awesome and that zone was awesome. It's hard to beat a team with 10 guys over 6-6 with 3 guys over 6-6. Especially when they are all athletic and they run a zone that well.FalconTurf wrote:Not sure what game everyone was watching but what I saw was an EMU team that was 3 or more inches taller and 20 or more pounds heavier at no less that 3 positions (usually 4) with more bounce in their jump and quickness in their feet. I would suggest these attributes made it easier to score, to pass and to handle the ball along with better defense.
The key tonight was our Falcons needed to play a perfect game and did not come close to that standard.
The key moving forward is we need bigger, stronger, faster athletes that have basketball skills. I see promise but we need more size to say the least.
