Average attendance for 2020-21 will be 300
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2020 7:48 pm
https://bgsufalcons.com/news/2020/11/9/ ... 20-21.aspx
Looks like I'll roll my tickets over to 21-22
Looks like I'll roll my tickets over to 21-22
Home of Falcon Fans Online!
https://www.ay-ziggy-zoomba.com/phpBB3/
https://www.ay-ziggy-zoomba.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=36023
Does indoor vs outdoor matter?OSUFALCON wrote:Total joke, this seems like a cop out. The NFL is allowed a % of capacity. 300 of a 5000 seat arena? I thought 1000-1200 would have been realistic.
Certainly should.Globetrotter wrote:Does indoor vs outdoor matter?OSUFALCON wrote:Total joke, this seems like a cop out. The NFL is allowed a % of capacity. 300 of a 5000 seat arena? I thought 1000-1200 would have been realistic.
Indoor vs. outdoor definitely changes the numbers. I've been pretty vocal about how cautious I think we should be, but I actually think 300 is a safe number to have in a building with an air filtration system as new as The Stroh. Especially considering most will be there in groups of, say 3 on average, so you'd only have about 100 areas of seats occupied. I assume the first 10 rows will be blocked off, as well, to keep people further away from the benches.hammb wrote:Certainly should.Globetrotter wrote:Does indoor vs outdoor matter?OSUFALCON wrote:Total joke, this seems like a cop out. The NFL is allowed a % of capacity. 300 of a 5000 seat arena? I thought 1000-1200 would have been realistic.
Personally, I never re-upped my tickets after my previous thread. I was not convinced, even at limited capacity, that sitting for hours at the Stroh was safe. Each side of the arena only has a single restroom for each gender. They never opened more than a single concession stand on either side of the arena either. The arena also has a natural "pinchpoint" by only really having a single entry point to the seating areas. None of these things are really an issue given the capacity of the arena in a normal environment, but during COVID I just wouldn't feel comfortable.
Perhaps I'd feel differently if there was some way to enforce masks, but if I've learned anything through the 9 months of COVID it's that a certain segment of our population refuses to wear masks (properly). As such I just don't think BG can do anything to make it a safe environment to spend 2 hours straight.
drumstix2388 wrote:Oh, I have no issue with the 300 number. According to the release it will not include any general ticket sales or season tickets. In other words it will be family, media, and maybe a few higher tier donors. I certainly think they should be able to maintain solid distancing guidelines at that number, and it also makes mask enforcement possible if they choose to do so.hammb wrote:Certainly should.Globetrotter wrote:Does indoor vs outdoor matter?OSUFALCON wrote:Total joke, this seems like a cop out. The NFL is allowed a % of capacity. 300 of a 5000 seat arena? I thought 1000-1200 would have been realistic.
Personally, I never re-upped my tickets after my previous thread. I was not convinced, even at limited capacity, that sitting for hours at the Stroh was safe. Each side of the arena only has a single restroom for each gender. They never opened more than a single concession stand on either side of the arena either. The arena also has a natural "pinchpoint" by only really having a single entry point to the seating areas. None of these things are really an issue given the capacity of the arena in a normal environment, but during COVID I just wouldn't feel comfortable.
Perhaps I'd feel differently if there was some way to enforce masks, but if I've learned anything through the 9 months of COVID it's that a certain segment of our population refuses to wear masks (properly). As such I just don't think BG can do anything to make it a safe environment to spend 2 hours straight.
I don't think there was (unfortunately) a way to open it up to season ticket holders (probably putting numbers closer to 1000 in play) and maintain a similar safety concern.
Indoor vs. outdoor definitely changes the numbers. I've been pretty vocal about how cautious I think we should be, but I actually think 300 is a safe number to have in a building with an air filtration system as new as The Stroh. Especially considering most will be there in groups of, say 3 on average, so you'd only have about 100 areas of seats occupied. I assume the first 10 rows will be blocked off, as well, to keep people further away from the benches.
Personally I wouldn't attend just because I don't think it would be that enjoyable to sit in a mostly empty arena with no concessions. I'd rather watch on TV until the atmosphere of college sports can safely return.
They aren't doing online lessons?OSUFALCON wrote:Hammb, you have every right to show concern but in my opinion this entire discussion is about what level of risk are you willing to take. I have worked right through this entire Covid-19 season as has 90% of people. Have I had family members get sick, yes. Have they been hospitalized, yes. Do I know people that have died, yes. We currently live in a school district that hasn’t had a in school lesson since March. The entire rest of the county and nearly all the state has resumed some form of in person classes. What I see more and more is conforming to fear. We can live with fear in the back of our minds and be carful. I did renewal my tickets with the thought that half wouldn’t and maybe this would be manageable with 800-1000 people. The entire college landscape will change. No way economically university’s will be able to afford all of these athletics as a luxury. Many were already operating in deficits. That’s my rant for the day. We all have choices and most have to work and provide.
I have been working right through this whole thing too. Well except for the time when my employer emailed on a Monday morning that he was going out of business. Luckily I'm in demand, called a couple of our competitors up and had a new job, bringing along my client base in a couple weeks.OSUFALCON wrote:Hammb, you have every right to show concern but in my opinion this entire discussion is about what level of risk are you willing to take. I have worked right through this entire Covid-19 season as has 90% of people. Have I had family members get sick, yes. Have they been hospitalized, yes. Do I know people that have died, yes. We currently live in a school district that hasn’t had a in school lesson since March. The entire rest of the county and nearly all the state has resumed some form of in person classes. What I see more and more is conforming to fear. We can live with fear in the back of our minds and be carful. I did renewal my tickets with the thought that half wouldn’t and maybe this would be manageable with 800-1000 people. The entire college landscape will change. No way economically university’s will be able to afford all of these athletics as a luxury. Many were already operating in deficits. That’s my rant for the day. We all have choices and most have to work and provide.
THIShammb wrote:This thing isn't getting better. It's getting worse. Because people are all interested in "living their life" or "accepting their own amount of risk" or whatever. It isn't enough. Maybe BG could have found a way to keep 800 people in the building safe. Maybe they could have found a way to enforce masking on those 800 people to make it safe. In the end, I think they realized those were near impossible goals when you cannot trust the general public to hold up their end of the bargain.