http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2010- ... ates_N.htm
Is this a good idea???



I still see it as another distraction we don't need when driving. What if you are pulling through an intersection (in a line of traffic) and the lane next to you is stopped. You see an "ad" on the back of the car next to you, you look, as it catches your eye. The guy ahead of you stops...and you plow into him.... Yeah, I know this kind of thing happens without license plate ads, but to me...it's just ONE MORE distraction behind the wheel...and who needs MORE ads????Tech83 wrote:I heard about this on NPR a couple of days ago. But the plates only change when you stop for a set period of time... and the question might be will you actually be able to see the plate or will you be on your blackberry watch youtube.

IMO it's completely inane and a waste of revenue...Falcon Fanatic wrote:These could be coming to Califonia:
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2010- ... ates_N.htm
Is this a good idea???




EXCELLENT! Forward this legislation to Columbus and Washington. The "texters" scare me more than the "DUI" crowd (although I'm no fan of either).Lord_Byron wrote:Here's an idea. If they could somehow put a receiver in the plate that can tell if there is cell-phone activity in the car.
Then the plate could glow bright red with the message:
"WARNING: Texting in Progress, Stay Back"