Interestingly enough, even Toledo is doing better than OSU in 3 out of the 4 as well.
http://bgsufalcons.collegesports.com/ge ... 06aad.html


PGY Tiercel wrote:Looks like the Univ is doing a pretty good job in educating and graduating it athletes. In 3 catagories BG is the Top in Ohio, and 2 in the MAC. (couple of 2nd and 3rds in there). We are 2nd behind Miami in one category.
Interestingly enough, even Toledo is doing better than OSU in 3 out of the 4 as well.![]()
http://bgsufalcons.collegesports.com/ge ... 06aad.html


i'm sure that is true as well. But to me it still says something about the Univ but even more so about Collegiate Athletics as whole, namely basketball and football. Football and basketball players have turned college into the minor leagues (hockey is a bit different due to their draft/signing rules). As OandB said graduating athletes is a higher priority at mid majors, but is also a higher priority in the non-revenue sports at large colleges compared to FB and BB teams. This is probably more due to the fact that a gymnast/swimmer/golfer etc isn't going to get much out of a great college career unless he/she has a degree but still most of those athletes fit the student-athlete bill much more than FB and BB players.tekekini wrote:
Im sure some of that has to do with the # of kids who leave early from OSU for Nfl and do not graduate and would have if they had stayed.
They send a lot of kids early.
1989-98 Freshman Cohorttekekini wrote:Im sure some of that has to do with the # of kids who leave early from OSU for Nfl and do not graduate and would have if they had stayed.
They send a lot of kids early.

Well, remember that only about 1/10 FB players in college go on to make the NFL, and probably about 1/30 basketball players make the NBA. It's only a small percentage of athletes that this pertains to.PGY Tiercel wrote:i'm sure that is true as well. But to me it still says something about the Univ but even more so about Collegiate Athletics as whole, namely basketball and football. Football and basketball players have turned college into the minor leagues (hockey is a bit different due to their draft/signing rules). As OandB said graduating athletes is a higher priority at mid majors, but is also a higher priority in the non-revenue sports at large colleges compared to FB and BB teams. This is probably more due to the fact that a gymnast/swimmer/golfer etc isn't going to get much out of a great college career unless he/she has a degree but still most of those athletes fit the student-athlete bill much more than FB and BB players.tekekini wrote:
Im sure some of that has to do with the # of kids who leave early from OSU for Nfl and do not graduate and would have if they had stayed.
They send a lot of kids early.

Actually, it doesn't. Fortunately, it sounds like they factor those things out. I found this in the article about UT's GSR.tekekini wrote:PGY Tiercel wrote:Looks like the Univ is doing a pretty good job in educating and graduating it athletes. In 3 catagories BG is the Top in Ohio, and 2 in the MAC. (couple of 2nd and 3rds in there). We are 2nd behind Miami in one category.
Interestingly enough, even Toledo is doing better than OSU in 3 out of the 4 as well.![]()
http://bgsufalcons.collegesports.com/ge ... 06aad.html
Im sure some of that has to do with the # of kids who leave early from OSU for Nfl and do not graduate and would have if they had stayed.
They send a lot of kids early.
http://utrockets.collegesports.com/genr ... 06aac.htmlThe GSR differs from the federal graduation rate, which counts only first-time, full-time freshmen who enter an institution during the fall semester, and which penalizes an institution for all transfers, even those in good academic standing.
"The NCAA considers the GSR to be more accurate than the federal rate in evaluating an institution's graduation rate," said Brian Lutz, UT assistant athletic director for compliance. "The GSR is more inclusive in that it covers more student-athletes than the federal rate. It also takes into account the increasing mobility of student-athletes who transfer or turn professional prior to graduation."

Take a look at Appendix C in the link:bgsufalcon24 wrote:Well, remember that only about 1/10 FB players in college go on to make the NFL, and probably about 1/30 basketball players make the NBA. It's only a small percentage of athletes that this pertains to.
Takes into account which way though? it counts kids leaving early against the university grad rate? or they dont count those kids at all in the rate?Touchdown Rockets wrote:Actually, it doesn't. Fortunately, it sounds like they factor those things out. I found this in the article about UT's GSR.tekekini wrote:PGY Tiercel wrote:Looks like the Univ is doing a pretty good job in educating and graduating it athletes. In 3 catagories BG is the Top in Ohio, and 2 in the MAC. (couple of 2nd and 3rds in there). We are 2nd behind Miami in one category.
Interestingly enough, even Toledo is doing better than OSU in 3 out of the 4 as well.![]()
http://bgsufalcons.collegesports.com/ge ... 06aad.html
Im sure some of that has to do with the # of kids who leave early from OSU for Nfl and do not graduate and would have if they had stayed.
They send a lot of kids early.
http://utrockets.collegesports.com/genr ... 06aac.htmlThe GSR differs from the federal graduation rate, which counts only first-time, full-time freshmen who enter an institution during the fall semester, and which penalizes an institution for all transfers, even those in good academic standing.
"The NCAA considers the GSR to be more accurate than the federal rate in evaluating an institution's graduation rate," said Brian Lutz, UT assistant athletic director for compliance. "The GSR is more inclusive in that it covers more student-athletes than the federal rate. It also takes into account the increasing mobility of student-athletes who transfer or turn professional prior to graduation."
