Potential 2007 rule changes

Discussion of the Falcon football team.
User avatar
PGY Tiercel
Salmon of Doubt
Salmon of Doubt
Posts: 2642
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 2:00 pm
Location: Pittsfield township, UofM
Contact:

Potential 2007 rule changes

Post by PGY Tiercel »

How good is our new kicker? A new rule change for 2007, might be moving kick-offs back to the 30yd line, to reduce touchbacks, and in turn speed up the game some. (also proposing to change back the clock rules changed last year, while finding other ways to keep game time down). Will the game plan still be to hope like hell the ball makes it into the end-zone, and if not, hope like hell they don't run it all the way back :wink:

2007 rule change proposals
--nullius in verba--
User avatar
1987alum
Noah's Dad
Noah's Dad
Posts: 7691
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 12:54 pm
Location: Philly

Post by 1987alum »

I think the rule change that could help us most would be reducing the number of people allowed to rush the punter to, say, maybe 1. :P
Hey, look at me! I'm all over the InterWebs!
Facebook ~ Twitter @ CoachKarlPA ~ LinkedIn
User avatar
BGorDeath
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 2268
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 9:28 pm
Location: Living Hell

Post by BGorDeath »

1987alum wrote:I think the rule change that could help us most would be reducing the number of people allowed to rush the punter to, say, maybe 1. :P
I would say we would still be at a disadvantage.
I like that steak comes from cows. That is why a cow will not think twice about eating you.
bg8492
Egg
Egg
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 7:43 am

Post by bg8492 »

at least have the rushers count to 3.
User avatar
Jacobs4Heisman
a.k.a. Capt. Rex Kramer
a.k.a. Capt. Rex Kramer
Posts: 7889
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: Aliquippa, PA

Post by Jacobs4Heisman »

If they want to shorten the game, shorten halftime. This will be a special advantage for us because it would allow less time for the opposing coach to make adjustments while we talk about what we dun good in the first half.
Roll Along!
San Diego Falcon
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:26 pm

Post by San Diego Falcon »

I still don't understand why they don't just adopt the NFL clock rules. Quit stopping the clock on a 1st down.
"but when you look at ths team beyond the suck , you see a glorious future again" - MACMAN
User avatar
1987alum
Noah's Dad
Noah's Dad
Posts: 7691
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 12:54 pm
Location: Philly

Post by 1987alum »

bg8492 wrote:at least have the rushers count to 3.
Maybe they should have to sing the opponents fight song before rushing. 8)
Hey, look at me! I'm all over the InterWebs!
Facebook ~ Twitter @ CoachKarlPA ~ LinkedIn
User avatar
orangeandbrown
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 3542
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Saline, MI
Contact:

Post by orangeandbrown »

bg8492 wrote:at least have the rushers count to 3.
Is that 3-mississippi?
User avatar
hammb
The Stabber of Cherries
The Stabber of Cherries
Posts: 14322
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:21 am
Location: Bowling Green

Post by hammb »

San Diego Falcon wrote:I still don't understand why they don't just adopt the NFL clock rules. Quit stopping the clock on a 1st down.
I like the college clock rules (well before they changed them last year). I think stopping the clock on first down makes for more drama towards the end of the game by allowing more late scoring drives.

I don't have a problem with 3 1/2-4 hour games though...I like football :)
User avatar
Flipper
The Global Village Idiot
The Global Village Idiot
Posts: 18315
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:01 am
Location: Ida Twp, MI

Post by Flipper »

Yep...I don't like the rule changes they implemented last year and I don't like the sound of these either.
User avatar
Globetrotter
Turbo
Turbo
Posts: 11315
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:17 am

Post by Globetrotter »

Great points all around. Maybe we could have our QB throw the ball down field as far as he can for our punts?
User avatar
Lord_Byron
Minister of Silly Walks
Minister of Silly Walks
Posts: 2158
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:04 am
Location: Rochester NY

Post by Lord_Byron »

hammb wrote: I don't have a problem with 3 1/2-4 hour games though...I like football :)
Don't mess with the rules when what has lengthened games is TV. I went to a Syracuse v. Army game a few years ago and there was no TV. That is, no local, cable, delayed broadcast, nothing.

After change of possession, the teams came on the field and the ball was blown ready and they started. Same after touchdowns, as soon as the PAT was over, the kick-off teams came on the field and were ready to go.

End result -- 2 1/2 hour football game. Sweet. It was just as much football as the 3-1/2 hour game, but without the dead time.
BG '79

Twitter: @Vapid_Inanities
User avatar
redskins4ever
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1596
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:11 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Post by redskins4ever »

How many kickers can reach the endzone in College now? Hell BG and MIami were doing that Pop up kick where the opponent was still getting the ball on the 30 yard line last year... ugh what an aweful thing to do... pushing the kickers back another 5 yards!

Here are my ideas for speeding up college football.

1) Shorten Halftime to 15 minutes... in the pros it is only 12... so 25% longer is a huge difference!

2) Media Timeouts shortened to just 2 minutes total.... none of this stretching it to 2:15...2:20... or 2:30 seconds... CBS, NBC, ABC and ESPN always try to squeeze in those extra revenue generating dollars!

With just two easy steps... I have eliminted 10-15 minutes of "game time" a week.
Falcons4Life
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 635
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 9:51 pm
Location: Lawrence, Kansas

Post by Falcons4Life »

Screw the kickoff....lets do a scrum!!!
I love my birds! Go Falcons, Go Jayhawks!!!
User avatar
Falconbadger
Egg
Egg
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:51 pm
Location: Port Washingtn, WI

Rule changes

Post by Falconbadger »

One of the things I find amusing is that back when the rule change was put in that stopped the clock while the sticks were advanced, one of the ways the NCAA touted it was that it would actually lengthen games. They even estimated that it would mean an additional X number of plays per game, meaning more action. Of course that was before they started plugging in so many TV timeouts. It was also during an era when college teams were running the ball extensively (the wishbone and veer era of the 70s and 80s). The running game kept the clock moving a lot more than it does now.

Damn, but I hate the fact that just about every post I include on these boards makes it real obvious that I was born in the era of leather helmets and single-bar facemasks.
:cloppy:
"No, it's NOT in Kentucky!"
Post Reply