Keep Brandon!!

cowboyjoe · Post by **cowboyjoe** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:08 pm

Why not have a thread started like this when it's after a good game for us. Someone always starts a negative thread after a bad loss.

MACMAN · Post by **MACMAN** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:28 pm

I was living in ice arenas today and missed all of it. I heard from one man, that Bg was running the ball very effectively and how it must have thrown Kent for a loop. Then to read all the various threads and read the stats. i have no feeling for the game, but from what I have read of various accounts.....I am impressed. Looks like we became unpredictable.
Can some tell me about the formations we were running from...was it still the spread ie a more west coast style or were we in the I, wishbone etc.....curious as to how much change we made.

MarkL · Post by **MarkL** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 11:35 pm

We pretty much ran the same formations we had been running, just figured out how to run the ball.

...finally

Falconboy · Post by **Falconboy** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 11:40 pm

MarkL wrote:We pretty much ran the same formations we had been running, just figured out how to run the ball.

...finally

From radio it seemed like Winny was in blocking more often today than in games past. I thought I also heard of Winny in the slot too , which is weird.

Jacobs4Heisman · Post by **Jacobs4Heisman** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 11:44 pm

We only ran about 5 plays in 5-wide, which is how it should be. We ran and passed out of 2 main personnel groups. 4-wide with Geter in the backfield, and 3 wide with Geter in the backfield and Winny either in Motion (think the QB draw play from last year), or lined up as a TE.

If we continue to be balanced, we'll score 30+ every game from here on out.

Falconboy · Post by **Falconboy** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 11:49 pm

Jacobs4Heisman wrote:We only ran about 5 plays in 5-wide, which is how it should be. We ran and passed out of 2 main personnel groups. 4-wide with Geter in the backfield, and 3 wide with Geter in the backfield and Winny either in Motion (think the QB draw play from last year), or lined up as a TE.

If we continue to be balanced, we'll score 30+ every game from here on out.

Yeah, I think the 5 wide has been way over used this year. 4 and 3 wide with a RB and TE/FB is the best formations to keep D's honest and to give TS more protection in the pocket.

BGGrad01 · Post by **BGGrad01** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 12:01 am

GB coached today's game like his job was on the line. The game plan was outstanding and some of the calls were quite ballsy. Good for him and the rest of the offensive coaching staff for emphasizing the running game. Hopefully this is a sign of things to come.

FalconTurf · Post by **FalconTurf** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 12:02 am

cowboyjoe wrote:Why not have a thread started like this when it's after a good game for us. Someone always starts a negative thread after a bad loss.

Are you sure we won by enough?

Ooops I forgot the

Dr.Sooner · Post by **Dr.Sooner** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:34 am

I think coach Brandon must have been listening to me last week. I told him to get back to the running game or else ---- and I also emphasized the need for some gaget (razzle-dazzles) plays much like t hey used against OU last year. ---- He must have been listening as my game plan was his, gaget plays and all. It didn't take a brain surgeon to figure out what had to be done. ---- I wish they'd let me call the plays for just one game (tongue in cheek).

Jacobs4Heisman · Post by **Jacobs4Heisman** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:18 am

Dr.Sooner wrote:I think coach Brandon must have been listening to me last week. I told him to get back to the running game or else ---- and I also emphasized the need for some gaget (razzle-dazzles) plays much like t hey used against OU last year. ---- He must have been listening as my game plan was his, gaget plays and all. It didn't take a brain surgeon to figure out what had to be done. ---- I wish they'd let me call the plays for just one game (tongue in cheek).

Yep -- you were the only one saying we needed to run the ball some more. Thank God you pointed that out for us, because most of us had no clue that balance would be good for the offense.

Dr.Sooner · Post by **Dr.Sooner** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:45 am

Well, Jacobs4heisman, does a sarcastic reply make you feel better. I was joking and said so... "tongue in cheek." Some of you people can be real jerks. If you don't understand the message, keep your reply to yourself.

zeket10 · Post by **zeket10** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:14 pm

Dr.Sooner wrote:Well, Jacobs4heisman, does a sarcastic reply make you feel better. I was joking and said so... "tongue in cheek." Some of you people can be real jerks. If you don't understand the message, keep your reply to yourself.

I know how you feel stay strong man

Falconfreak90 · Post by **Falconfreak90** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:18 pm

Well played. Good thread.

Falcon137 · Post by **Falcon137** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:34 pm

Dr.Sooner wrote:Well, Jacobs4heisman, does a sarcastic reply make you feel better. I was joking and said so... "tongue in cheek." Some of you people can be real jerks. If you don't understand the message, keep your reply to yourself.

Then whats the point of a message board?

Jacobs4Heisman · Post by **Jacobs4Heisman** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:39 pm

Dr.Sooner wrote:Well, Jacobs4heisman, does a sarcastic reply make you feel better. I was joking and said so... "tongue in cheek." Some of you people can be real jerks. If you don't understand the message, keep your reply to yourself.

Keep Brandon!!

Keep Brandon!!

Re: Keep Brandon!!