to the rumor that our playbook cosists of 4 plays all drawn on the back of kids menu?
--MH
Is there any truth
-
michhiker28
- Peregrine

- Posts: 703
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 3:18 pm
- Location: Middle of the Mitten
Is there any truth
Coming to you direct from flatland basecamp.
-
bgsufalcon24
- Peregrine

- Posts: 4072
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 1:46 pm
- Location: Strongsville, Ohio
Re: Is there any truth
Lamemichhiker28 wrote:to the rumor that our playbook cosists of 4 plays all drawn on the back of kids menu?
--MH
24. Quality provider of the truth, for better or for worse.
-
transfer2BGSU
- Peregrine

- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:50 am
- Location: Jed's, Myle's Pizza, Corner Grill
Re: Is there any truth
Better than calling for a boycott.bgsufalcon24 wrote:Lamemichhiker28 wrote:to the rumor that our playbook cosists of 4 plays all drawn on the back of kids menu?
--MH
"The name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back" -Herb Brooks
-
bgsufalcon24
- Peregrine

- Posts: 4072
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 1:46 pm
- Location: Strongsville, Ohio
Re: Is there any truth
And how do you figure that? Because I'm "not being a true BG fan?!!"transfer2BGSU wrote:Better than calling for a boycott.bgsufalcon24 wrote:Lamemichhiker28 wrote:to the rumor that our playbook cosists of 4 plays all drawn on the back of kids menu?
--MH
w/e.
24. Quality provider of the truth, for better or for worse.
-
professorjackson
- Fledgling

- Posts: 421
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:15 pm
- Location: Toledo, Ohio
- Contact:
-
bgsufalcon24
- Peregrine

- Posts: 4072
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 1:46 pm
- Location: Strongsville, Ohio
I don't think you understand the whole intent behind "the boycott." The boycott is not a restriction on saying whatever I feel about the team on a site that is completely unaffiliated with Bowling Green State University. It simply means that I will not be watching, listening to, following online, or attending any games until I see fit to end the famine.kdog27 wrote:I think it is lame that you claim to be on a boycott, yet here you are posting away and making predictions that we will win. Some boycott.
I predicted a win this week because based on our current track record, we WILL win this game on the road, just in time to lay another egg in the Doyt next week against Kent. THAT'S why I'm not going to be suckered, hopefully, into going to the game on 11/1. I've seen far too much heartbreak in that stadium over four years to carry on any longer. And that's all I'm going to say about that.
24. Quality provider of the truth, for better or for worse.
Instead of boycotting you should look for a more equitable solution to the problem and I think that I have just the answer! I feel that we should tax any team with an average yearly attendance of 250,000 or more. They should spread the wealth of not only their roster but also their wallets with all of the less privlidged programs. I mean, really, that's the only reason that we're in this situation right now. It's not the underachievment of our team or coaching staff, it's because the other teams won't share their wealth with us....bgsufalcon24 wrote:I don't think you understand the whole intent behind "the boycott." The boycott is not a restriction on saying whatever I feel about the team on a site that is completely unaffiliated with Bowling Green State University. It simply means that I will not be watching, listening to, following online, or attending any games until I see fit to end the famine.kdog27 wrote:I think it is lame that you claim to be on a boycott, yet here you are posting away and making predictions that we will win. Some boycott.
I predicted a win this week because based on our current track record, we WILL win this game on the road, just in time to lay another egg in the Doyt next week against Kent. THAT'S why I'm not going to be suckered, hopefully, into going to the game on 11/1. I've seen far too much heartbreak in that stadium over four years to carry on any longer. And that's all I'm going to say about that.
Barack??BGFan wrote:Instead of boycotting you should look for a more equitable solution to the problem and I think that I have just the answer! I feel that we should tax any team with an average yearly attendance of 250,000 or more. They should spread the wealth of not only their roster but also their wallets with all of the less privlidged programs. I mean, really, that's the only reason that we're in this situation right now. It's not the underachievment of our team or coaching staff, it's because the other teams won't share their wealth with us....bgsufalcon24 wrote:I don't think you understand the whole intent behind "the boycott." The boycott is not a restriction on saying whatever I feel about the team on a site that is completely unaffiliated with Bowling Green State University. It simply means that I will not be watching, listening to, following online, or attending any games until I see fit to end the famine.kdog27 wrote:I think it is lame that you claim to be on a boycott, yet here you are posting away and making predictions that we will win. Some boycott.
I predicted a win this week because based on our current track record, we WILL win this game on the road, just in time to lay another egg in the Doyt next week against Kent. THAT'S why I'm not going to be suckered, hopefully, into going to the game on 11/1. I've seen far too much heartbreak in that stadium over four years to carry on any longer. And that's all I'm going to say about that.
