Rightupinthere wrote:Since when does a logo have to "be" something to represent something? You want to tell me that michigan's helmet design represents something?Sub-Zero wrote: And thats wonderful. But its not just about us. We also need to engage the 60 million rabid college football and basketball fans around the country. I have relocated to several markets outside of Ohio in my career and you always want your degree to carry as much weight and exposure as possible during those travels. College sports is a key vehicle in making that happen. And our logo is part of that marketing equation. When you are sitting in a Dallas sports bar and BG is on a national ESPN game, the last thing you want to hear from the resident A&M guy is "whats that swirley outline on y'alls lid?"
Wife is from Dallas and I had an Aggie and UT person ask several years ago why we changed our mascot to "Space Ghost" (direct and embarrassing quote.) The old logo was a very good logo and myself along with countless others knew what the logo was at first glance.
Michigan's helmet design isn't really their primary logo though, they've got the M.
I am in the unique position of having my time at BG split by the two logos. When I first toured the campus as a high school senior and for roughly the first half of my time there, the "LT" logo was in use. Then midway through, we got the new logo, and frankly, I like them both. Both are on display in my home in various forms, I have two BG pint glasses, one with each logo, and I have various items of BG apparel with the two different logos.
I do think though, that to the average person with limited to no BG contact on a regular basis, the new logo is a little more obviously a bird of some sort (they may not know it's a falcon straight off if they don't know our nickname). To me, it's clearer, and looks a little more contemporary, but because of the keeping of the overall shape of the falcon head, it still ties to the old logo strongly as well.


