UMass leaving the MAC after 2015
Re: UMass leaving the MAC after 2015
I am a bit curious what UMass will do next. They want to maintain FBS status but I don't see a way forward. Would any conference take them? The only conferences that geographically make any sense are the ACC and AAC ... yeah right. So do they honestly think they can be an FBS independent? I imagine they would try to schedule 11 FBS teams looking for an easy win and an FCS team and hope they win at least two games each year. I don't see a program like that able to justify its existence. Unless I am missing an option, it seems UMass will ultimately go back to FCS. Would their old conference take them back?
MarkL has spoken.
You may all now return to your daily lives.
You may all now return to your daily lives.
- BGFalconfromCincy
- Peregrine

- Posts: 3620
- Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 1:55 pm
- Location: Toledo, OH
Re: UMass leaving the MAC after 2015
The CAA was struggling to keep teams and have enough for football so I say they would.MarkL wrote:I am a bit curious what UMass will do next. They want to maintain FBS status but I don't see a way forward. Would any conference take them? The only conferences that geographically make any sense are the ACC and AAC ... yeah right. So do they honestly think they can be an FBS independent? I imagine they would try to schedule 11 FBS teams looking for an easy win and an FCS team and hope they win at least two games each year. I don't see a program like that able to justify its existence. Unless I am missing an option, it seems UMass will ultimately go back to FCS. Would their old conference take them back?
As for FBS options there only one is the Sun Belt, which is at 11, needing a 12th for a title game. Everyone else is at an even number
BGSU c/o 2009 & 2013
Ay-Ziggy-Zoomba, because that's how I roll
Ay-Ziggy-Zoomba, because that's how I roll
Re: UMass leaving the MAC after 2015
So the Sun Belt would be a mostly southern conference that also includes Idaho and UMass. And I thought the AAC made no sense ...BGFalconfromCincy wrote:The CAA was struggling to keep teams and have enough for football so I say they would.MarkL wrote:I am a bit curious what UMass will do next. They want to maintain FBS status but I don't see a way forward. Would any conference take them? The only conferences that geographically make any sense are the ACC and AAC ... yeah right. So do they honestly think they can be an FBS independent? I imagine they would try to schedule 11 FBS teams looking for an easy win and an FCS team and hope they win at least two games each year. I don't see a program like that able to justify its existence. Unless I am missing an option, it seems UMass will ultimately go back to FCS. Would their old conference take them back?
As for FBS options there only one is the Sun Belt, which is at 11, needing a 12th for a title game. Everyone else is at an even number
MarkL has spoken.
You may all now return to your daily lives.
You may all now return to your daily lives.
-
60yearsofsicsic
- Fledgling

- Posts: 494
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 8:17 pm
Re: UMass leaving the MAC after 2015
They will be in the American Conference. They will be accepted because of good basketball history and the Boston market. The school fits in with size and economic structure.
Re: UMass leaving the MAC after 2015
This. This. This. How many times does a conference have to send its weaker team to the tourney and have them bomb out, only to see the regular season champ snubbed (again) for an at-large bid before the folks at the main office get it through their THICK SKULLS that the tourney is of NO benefit to the conference if it is trying to send its best team every year. Probably 40 percent of the time, the regular season champ ends up losing in the tourney and doesn't get in.Falconfreak90 wrote:Dead on Transfer...BG was more than qualified for an at large this year and we got shafted again. How about the MAC office change policy and give the bid to the regular season champ instead? We could still have a tourney and the winner of that gets an automatic bid to the WNIT. If its the same team, the runner up gets the WNIT automatic. I mean we had ONE FREAKIN BAD game all year and it cost us dearly so some half azzed bcs conf teams could get in.
And UMass? Bye. That's all.
Enough of this nonsense. A regular season champion has spent MONTHS of hard work to get that trophy. Reward them with the tournament bid. Not some team that happens to get hot and/or lucky over a few days.
As for UMass -- good riddance.
- BGFalconfromCincy
- Peregrine

- Posts: 3620
- Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 1:55 pm
- Location: Toledo, OH
Re: UMass leaving the MAC after 2015
With the American having football their strong basketball probably won't even be a factor on if they get a invite, its all about football and the market, that's what driving realignment for conferences with football, not basketball performance.60yearsofsicsic wrote:They will be in the American Conference. They will be accepted because of good basketball history and the Boston market. The school fits in with size and economic structure.
BGSU c/o 2009 & 2013
Ay-Ziggy-Zoomba, because that's how I roll
Ay-Ziggy-Zoomba, because that's how I roll
- Schadenfreude
- Professional tractor puller

- Posts: 6983
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
- Location: Colorado
Re: UMass leaving the MAC after 2015
Do you have one in mind?mscarn wrote:If they even think of treating us like a yo-yo and moving us back to the West then BG should look for a new conference.
Re: UMass leaving the MAC after 2015
1) The Eastern Conference of the NBASchadenfreude wrote:Do you have one in mind?mscarn wrote:If they even think of treating us like a yo-yo and moving us back to the West then BG should look for a new conference.
2) The next TED talk (Babers has Mic'd up experience)
100) AAC
1000) CUSA
