Schadenfreude wrote:The BGSU news release indicated that our original plan was to host South Carolina State in the opener, but that they "backed out." So, when Alabama-Birmingham decided to shut down the football program, we jumped at the chance to fill the hole in the Vols schedule, and in ours.
Put another way: We did not have many other options at this point, so we signed up with Tennessee.
I would imagine Babers isn't thrilled about this. Had we stuck with our original plan, our nonconference schedule would have been close to ideal: South Carolina State, at Maryland, Memphis, at Purdue. That's smart scheduling. This is tougher sledding, no doubt.
But it isn't an impossible challenge, either. I wouldn't be shocked to see the Falcons to win any of these games if they play anywhere near to what we know they are capable of. Tennessee is a 6-6 SEC team. Peyton Manning is long gone, fellas.
Peyton has been gone for 16 seasons...and Tennessee has fallen on hard times, lately. With that being said, they are one of the youngest FBS teams. Tennessee has played 23 True Freshmen this season. Of those 23, 14 have started sometime throughout the season. UT started this season with 6 Seniors on the 2-deep.
Tennessee is a 6-6 team (two plays from being 8-4...but then again...a play away from being 5-7, too). Tennessee's 6 losses were to: Oklahoma (8-4), Georgia (9-3), Florida (6-5), Ole Miss (9-3), Alabama (12-1), and Missouri (10-3). Florida is the only stinker among those, and UT lost to them by 1 point...I'm just saying that UT is a pretty good 6-6 team, and with the players they have coming back, they should be significantly better next year.
I'm glad that UT was able to swap out UAB with BGSU. The Falcons are a much better opponent, and will be an early test to see how good UT really is.



