vs. Akron (10/9)

Discussion of the Falcon football team.
User avatar
Falconfreak90
Rubber City Falcon
Rubber City Falcon
Posts: 18495
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:28 am
Location: Green, OH
Contact:

Re: vs. Akron (10/9)

Post by Falconfreak90 »

mbenecke wrote: Sat Oct 09, 2021 2:11 pm Akron sacks McDonald we’ll punt it away in the middle of the 3rd quarter.

It’s clear the Zips want this one more. Kinda embarrassing.
This right here. They simply wanted it more. What made me mad was watching our players jaw with them when trailing. that s**t needs to stop.
Michael W.
BGSU-12 TIME MAC CHAMPION
FALCON FOOTBALL ROCKS!
User avatar
roguewarrior
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1182
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:54 pm

Re: vs. Akron (10/9)

Post by roguewarrior »

Falconfreak90 wrote: Sun Oct 10, 2021 9:55 am
mbenecke wrote: Sat Oct 09, 2021 2:11 pm Akron sacks McDonald we’ll punt it away in the middle of the 3rd quarter.

It’s clear the Zips want this one more. Kinda embarrassing.
This right here. They simply wanted it more. What made me mad was watching our players jaw with them when trailing. that s**t needs to stop.
The mark of selfish, no character players. Makes my blood boil. I saw it a Tennessee. A parent said “coach isn’t going to like that”…. I said coach ain’t going to do a thing. And they don’t.

Edit: we don’t have many, but a few will bring you down.
It’s not my point of view, it’s a fact.
User avatar
Flipper
The Global Village Idiot
The Global Village Idiot
Posts: 18315
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:01 am
Location: Ida Twp, MI

Re: vs. Akron (10/9)

Post by Flipper »

Preach one thing...do another. Next to impossible to maintain credibility when you're doing that.
It's not the fall that hurts...it's when you hit the ground.
User avatar
Schadenfreude
Professional tractor puller
Professional tractor puller
Posts: 6983
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
Location: Colorado

Re: vs. Akron (10/9)

Post by Schadenfreude »

Well.

That was fugly.

We knew the road to becoming competitive again was not going to be a straight line, but I sure didn't see this coming.

This is the series really sticks with me:
BillyLP wrote: Sat Oct 09, 2021 12:42 pm
BGMiner wrote: Sat Oct 09, 2021 12:37 pm Couldn’t punch it in 4 times.
Yeah I blame that on play-calling. O-Line was gassed and still called power runs up the middle.
I think I know what Loeffler was thinking at the time. At the time, the Falcons were just rolling the Zips. Loeffler saw a chance to urge his offensive line to go mano a mano against the worst defense in the country, and get something out of it either way. If the Falcons could muscle it in: Great! Seven points. Plus it would be a victory for that line, which has struggled so much. If not, it would show how much work our linemen still have to do in the weight room this summer.

It made sense to me at the time.

What Loeffler didn't count on -- and what I didn't count on either -- was Akron suddenly figuring out how to play football. I bet Loeffler is kicking himself right now for not once calling a misdirection in this series. If he had, maybe we get those points, and maybe this game turns out differently. Just as the players are learning the importance of concentration on every series, maybe there is a lesson here for Loeffler, too.

Obviously, this game didn't come down to that series. A lot went wrong. The defense didn't prep for the new Zip quarterback in the second half, and he found a way to throw the ball on us more effectively than anyone else has this season. This wasn't McDonald's best game. Receivers had drops. Etc.

I think this staff is pretty smart, and they will learn from this game, as will the players.

But, man, that game was a real bummer.
User avatar
Flipper
The Global Village Idiot
The Global Village Idiot
Posts: 18315
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:01 am
Location: Ida Twp, MI

Re: vs. Akron (10/9)

Post by Flipper »

Loefffler is stubborn...slow to adjust and prone to weird lapses in judgement. i wanted him to succeed here....but I don't think it's going to happen
It's not the fall that hurts...it's when you hit the ground.
User avatar
Beaker
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 790
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:53 am
Location: Thornville, Ohio

Re: vs. Akron (10/9)

Post by Beaker »

I had voiced my extreme reservation at how big the oddsmakers had favored us in this one. This team is showing some serious schizophrenia. They demonstrate there's ability there, then show they don't know how to harness and apply it. It's a frustrating experience as a fan, because we all want to see the sure and steady upward trajectory without the dips we saw this week, but that's not the reality. This team is like a stock market index. They shoot upward one day and put visions of lofty heights in your head, then come back and crush you the next day. I'll refer to them as the S&P - Super and Poor. You don't know what you will get from one week to the next or even from one quarter to the next within the same game.

If you wager on these games, it seems like only safe bet for this team this year is to go opposite of what Vegas thinks. I can't imagine us being favored on a betting line again this season.
Hockey John
Fledgling
Fledgling
Posts: 318
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2004 11:24 am
Location: Findlay, Ohio

Re: vs. Akron (10/9)

Post by Hockey John »

Beaker wrote: Mon Oct 11, 2021 9:07 am I had voiced my extreme reservation at how big the oddsmakers had favored us in this one. This team is showing some serious schizophrenia. They demonstrate there's ability there, then show they don't know how to harness and apply it. It's a frustrating experience as a fan, because we all want to see the sure and steady upward trajectory without the dips we saw this week, but that's not the reality. This team is like a stock market index. They shoot upward one day and put visions of lofty heights in your head, then come back and crush you the next day. I'll refer to them as the S&P - Super and Poor. You don't know what you will get from one week to the next or even from one quarter to the next within the same game.

If you wager on these games, it seems like only safe bet for this team this year is to go opposite of what Vegas thinks. I can't imagine us being favored on a betting line again this season.
For what it is worth, until Saturday, BG was the only team to 100% beat the spread.
Antimob
Chick
Chick
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2018 11:08 am

Re: vs. Akron (10/9)

Post by Antimob »

Here comes the mob again. Parents in the stands whining about playing time and talk of going to the portal is not the answer. It is amateur high school crap far worse than competitive players.

Calm down. We will win when we have better/older players like every team in America. If everyone quit when things were tough the 2001 team would have never happened. Most of those guys played on bad teams and didn't get it rolling until their junior & senior years.

Complaining and quitting. That's the solution to everything these days. Work harder, get better, follow a process, delay gratification? That's for suckers. How sad.
User avatar
roguewarrior
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1182
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:54 pm

Re: vs. Akron (10/9)

Post by roguewarrior »

Antimob wrote: Mon Oct 11, 2021 6:00 pm Here comes the mob again. Parents in the stands whining about playing time and talk of going to the portal is not the answer. It is amateur high school crap far worse than competitive players.

Calm down. We will win when we have better/older players like every team in America. If everyone quit when things were tough the 2001 team would have never happened. Most of those guys played on bad teams and didn't get it rolling until their junior & senior years.

Complaining and quitting. That's the solution to everything these days. Work harder, get better, follow a process, delay gratification? That's for suckers. How sad.
By that logic, no coach should ever be let go. Everyone loves the portal until their players hit it.
It’s not my point of view, it’s a fact.
User avatar
It's the Journey...
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 2347
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 10:17 pm
Location: Bowling Green, Ohio

Re: vs. Akron (10/9)

Post by It's the Journey... »

What happened to all the "development" that took place last season? We were 0-5, but supposedly learned to much. What a load of crap. By this time the team is Loeffler's. He has driven many away from the Jinks' years, and event some of his own have left or entered the portal. But we will hear about how young we are and why that is will not be addressed. We will also hear about how the week of practice was bad, but why this is will not be addressed. There is no accountability for this team, or it seems the coaching staff. We are 23 games into the Loeffler era and he has won 5 (22%). As a comparison, after 23 games Jinks had won 6 games (26%). Jinks would coach 8 more games in his time here and win 1 more for a record of 7-24 (23%). There are 6 more games this season and I don't see any that are winnable. We may have a chance in the second game of the 2022 season when we host Eastern Kentucky. It is time to use the same measuring stick across coaches.
"If all do not join now to save the good old ship of the Union this voyage nobody will have a chance to pilot her on another voyage."
A. Lincoln


The BGSU Men's Chorus
America's Finest Singing Machine
BGSU Brothers Sing On

Charge on Colts, Charge on!

"ROLL ALONG!"
User avatar
Flipper
The Global Village Idiot
The Global Village Idiot
Posts: 18315
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:01 am
Location: Ida Twp, MI

Re: vs. Akron (10/9)

Post by Flipper »

We'll win when we get a better coach....These are his players and his culture. If it's not working...and clearly it isn't...who else do you blame?
It's not the fall that hurts...it's when you hit the ground.
User avatar
Schadenfreude
Professional tractor puller
Professional tractor puller
Posts: 6983
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
Location: Colorado

Re: vs. Akron (10/9)

Post by Schadenfreude »

It's the Journey... wrote: Mon Oct 11, 2021 9:30 pm We are 23 games into the Loeffler era and he has won 5 (22%). As a comparison, after 23 games Jinks had won 6 games (26%).
The difference is the trajectory. Jinks had the program nosediving. Loeffler is getting this program back off the ground.

The loss to Akron was a bad loss, no question. But progress isn't always a straight line. The team was so bad last year that two wins this season does represent progress. It is about what I expected. Next year, with a stronger offensive line and more experience all around, perhaps we can go for .500 and maybe (with some breaks) even a bowl game. The year after that, we will be playing for a division title. That's the schedule, and we are on schedule.

I wouldn't rule out getting another win or two this year. It won't be easy, but if this team can continue to improve as it has already done this season, it is within reach.
User avatar
BillyLP
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 3132
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: vs. Akron (10/9)

Post by BillyLP »

Schadenfreude wrote: Tue Oct 12, 2021 10:57 am
It's the Journey... wrote: Mon Oct 11, 2021 9:30 pm We are 23 games into the Loeffler era and he has won 5 (22%). As a comparison, after 23 games Jinks had won 6 games (26%).
The difference is the trajectory. Jinks had the program nosediving. Loeffler is getting this program back off the ground.

The loss to Akron was a bad loss, no question. But progress isn't always a straight line. The team was so bad last year that two wins this season does represent progress. It is about what I expected. Next year, with a stronger offensive line and more experience all around, perhaps we can go for .500 and maybe (with some breaks) even a bowl game. The year after that, we will be playing for a division title. That's the schedule, and we are on schedule.

I wouldn't rule out getting another win or two this year. It won't be easy, but if this team can continue to improve as it has already done this season, it is within reach.
I generally agree with this. If they can do a 3-9 or 4-8, I think it's a win of a year and we can look forward to a solid 6-6 team or better next season. The team is, without question, better than last year. More disciplined, much better defense, marginally better offense, and solid special teams, but the kids need to see winning as part of the reward for sticking it out, not just improvement. If they finish 2-10, some of the the players who were all in after the Minnesota game will be heading elsewhere.
BG '10

Attended more games than any responsible student should have.
User avatar
pdt1081
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 4903
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 11:09 am

Re: vs. Akron (10/9)

Post by pdt1081 »

Schadenfreude wrote: Tue Oct 12, 2021 10:57 am
It's the Journey... wrote: Mon Oct 11, 2021 9:30 pm We are 23 games into the Loeffler era and he has won 5 (22%). As a comparison, after 23 games Jinks had won 6 games (26%).
The difference is the trajectory. Jinks had the program nosediving. Loeffler is getting this program back off the ground.

The loss to Akron was a bad loss, no question. But progress isn't always a straight line. The team was so bad last year that two wins this season does represent progress. It is about what I expected. Next year, with a stronger offensive line and more experience all around, perhaps we can go for .500 and maybe (with some breaks) even a bowl game. The year after that, we will be playing for a division title. That's the schedule, and we are on schedule.

I wouldn't rule out getting another win or two this year. It won't be easy, but if this team can continue to improve as it has already done this season, it is within reach.
This forum went from "We can beat anybody left on the schedule," to "Fire the coach" in a matter of 20 minutes.
Phi or Die
User avatar
Flipper
The Global Village Idiot
The Global Village Idiot
Posts: 18315
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:01 am
Location: Ida Twp, MI

Re: vs. Akron (10/9)

Post by Flipper »

In the desert...you could go from drinking from a pond to "s**t...this is sand" in seconds. It's called a mirage.

Sure we could win a few more this year...maybe all of them..it's not like the MAC is a decent conference...but we could also lose them. From my perspective...it almost doesn't matter. Looking at the trajectory of the program, Loeffler's insistence on running an offense that was dated 10 years ago and his in game decisions...it's hard to see us becoming the power we were under Clawson.

FWIW...I was one oft he few people on here who was always in Clawson'c corner...even when we were losing big...because I could see what he was trying to do. I don't get the same sense of direction from Loeffler
It's not the fall that hurts...it's when you hit the ground.
Post Reply