BG Rushing Attack?

Discussion of the Falcon football team.
User avatar
hammb
The Stabber of Cherries
The Stabber of Cherries
Posts: 14333
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:21 am
Location: Bowling Green

Re: Get more athletic??

Post by hammb »

falconboy wrote:What does that mean? Why do we need to get more athletic at TE befoe we use em'? That doesnt make sense to me. :coo-coo: Is that the reason why we only pass to the TE every other leap year it seems? :shrug:

falconboy :supz:
The best use of the TE position is to send them in the middle seam to split today's en vogue Cover-2 defense. That's the most common use nowadays with cover-2 being so rampant, but in the end the key to a TE is someone who is able to find the seams in the zone and get there. If its a man coverage the TE must be athletic enough to beat the LBs. Ours have not been the types who are going to consistently get into these seams or beat LBs on routes. As a result we've not been using them as much as some teams.

Our TEs in recent years have not been as good of athletes as typical MAC LBs. They are good blockers with good hands, but they're not athletic enough to really be used in the down the field passing game. Conversely TEs aren't real useful in a quick hitting passing game either, as they usually cannot get off the LoS cleanly.

I would love to see us use the TE as a weapon, but in the end it takes a special athlete to become a dominant TE. A stud TE ranks right up there with 300 pound athletic DTs when it comes to what's most difficult to find in recruiting.
User avatar
Flipper
The Global Village Idiot
The Global Village Idiot
Posts: 18322
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:01 am
Location: Ida Twp, MI

Post by Flipper »

With you on the athletic TE hammb and 87. I just wish we could keep Winovich at LB. I could see him maturing into a 245lb freight train that could cover TE's and smash QB/RB's. Think Luis Llamas with better grades and no manslaughter charges.

When looking at our running stats, it's important to remember that we use that little swing pass as a virtual running play. That play nets us some good yardage and it's really nothing more than an overhand pitch wide right or left.
User avatar
1987alum
Noah's Dad
Noah's Dad
Posts: 7691
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 12:54 pm
Location: Philly

Re: Get more athletic??

Post by 1987alum »

falconboy wrote:What does that mean? Why do we need to get more athletic at TE befoe we use em'? That doesnt make sense to me. :coo-coo: Is that the reason why we only pass to the TE every other leap year it seems? :shrug:

falconboy :supz:
building off what hammb said ... why would we throw to the TE more often if they aren't athletic enough to get open on a regular basis? You have to have the horses in place before you can run.
Hey, look at me! I'm all over the InterWebs!
Facebook ~ Twitter @ CoachKarlPA ~ LinkedIn
Falconboy
John Lovett's Successor
John Lovett's Successor
Posts: 5357
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Columbus
Contact:

With O'drobinack and Winovich

Post by Falconboy »

Hopefully we should have the athletets with those guys playing TE now. O'drobinack has the size needed for a good TE at 6'4 and 250. Winovich could also make a good LB as well, and we sure need some bigger ones in there. Yeay, Dibacco isnt the athlete your all talking about , but O'
Drobinack should be.

falconboy :supz:
Mid-2000's Anderson Animal
Post Reply