@UCLA (9/3)

Discussion of the Falcon football team.
User avatar
Falconfreak90
Rubber City Falcon
Rubber City Falcon
Posts: 18498
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:28 am
Location: Green, OH
Contact:

Re: @UCLA (9/3)

Post by Falconfreak90 »

Saw some good things today. Our D will be pretty solid in the MAC. RB by committee will work but our O line still needs a lot of work. QB? I say go with Orth and see what he can do but that won't happen. UCLA is very good and a solid team.
Michael W.
BGSU-12 TIME MAC CHAMPION
FALCON FOOTBALL ROCKS!
User avatar
MarkL
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 5558
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:23 am
Location: Greater Washington DC area

Re: @UCLA (9/3)

Post by MarkL »

A great start with the turnovers and the STs. One great offensive drive and a other good one.

Then the heat hit and everything went to crap. QB accuracy still a problem. Defense has a lot of talent and hopefully will be better against non power talent.
MarkL has spoken.
You may all now return to your daily lives.
User avatar
BillyLP
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 3134
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: @UCLA (9/3)

Post by BillyLP »

Frankly, if you would have told me before the game the score would be 45-17, I would have been okay with it. Unfortunately, I watched the first 20 minutes and got my hopes up.

Overall, I just hope none of the injuries are significant and that they can rehydrate and recover for next game. I really like the defense, but they were absolutely gassed by the second half of the second quarter. Even so, I think they held their own.

Offense was horrible. McDonald was horrible, WRs were horrible, center play was horrible. TEs are a strength, and overall I think the offensive line seemed improved. UCLA does have a solid, athletic defense, so it's hard to gauge what BG will be like against similar competition, but If they don't put up 45 against EKU next week, I'll officially be worried.
BG '10

Attended more games than any responsible student should have.
User avatar
Falconfreak90
Rubber City Falcon
Rubber City Falcon
Posts: 18498
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:28 am
Location: Green, OH
Contact:

Re: @UCLA (9/3)

Post by Falconfreak90 »

BillyLP wrote: Sat Sep 03, 2022 6:15 pm Frankly, if you would have told me before the game the score would be 45-17, I would have been okay with it. Unfortunately, I watched the first 20 minutes and got my hopes up.

Overall, I just hope none of the injuries are significant and that they can rehydrate and recover for next game. I really like the defense, but they were absolutely gassed by the second half of the second quarter. Even so, I think they held their own.

Offense was horrible. McDonald was horrible, WRs were horrible, center play was horrible. TEs are a strength, and overall I think the offensive line seemed improved. UCLA does have a solid, athletic defense, so it's hard to gauge what BG will be like against similar competition, but If they don't put up 45 against EKU next week, I'll officially be worried.
Well said, Billy. EKU will be no pushover. They hung w/ EMU all game and I think only lost by 6 or?
Michael W.
BGSU-12 TIME MAC CHAMPION
FALCON FOOTBALL ROCKS!
User avatar
jpfalcon09
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8477
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:32 pm
Location: Detroit Beach, MI

Re: @UCLA (9/3)

Post by jpfalcon09 »

BillyLP wrote: Sat Sep 03, 2022 6:15 pm Frankly, if you would have told me before the game the score would be 45-17, I would have been okay with it. Unfortunately, I watched the first 20 minutes and got my hopes up.

Overall, I just hope none of the injuries are significant and that they can rehydrate and recover for next game. I really like the defense, but they were absolutely gassed by the second half of the second quarter. Even so, I think they held their own.

Offense was horrible. McDonald was horrible, WRs were horrible, center play was horrible. TEs are a strength, and overall I think the offensive line seemed improved. UCLA does have a solid, athletic defense, so it's hard to gauge what BG will be like against similar competition, but If they don't put up 45 against EKU next week, I'll officially be worried.
Only scored 27 vs. Murray State last year. Same cast of characters so don't get your hopes up. EKU can be a loss and if it is the season will be off the rails two weeks in, and the countdown to getting a new coach will be on.
The longer the walk, the farther you crawl.
User avatar
mbenecke
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8380
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:48 pm
Location: Napoleon, OH
Contact:

Re: @UCLA (9/3)

Post by mbenecke »

mbenecke wrote: Mon Aug 29, 2022 8:11 am Finally game week!

I agree with the sentiment above that it probably won't be close, but I expect that every time we play P5 schools. Until proven otherwise that we can CONSISTENTLY hang, that's just kinda reality/my expectation for us.

I'm also thinking something along the lines of 45-17 or something like that. It's just too much to handle in Week 1, and I don't see us scoring much.

If we're competitive in the 2nd half, that could mean big things for this year. Looking forward to watching this one. I hope to see a disciplined football team with some fight in them.

I believe it's a 2:30pm (EST) kickoff on the PAC 12 Network, for those planning to watch.
Let the record show that I picked 45-17 back on Monday this week. Lol

I think we're gonna be alright. We were competitive for a half and then ran out of gas against a much more talented and deeper P5 squad. I don't think anyone should be surprised by anything today. I think we're being somewhat prisoners of the moment, and that has extra emphasis because we started hot and led 17-7.

We obviously need to get a lot better, and next week could be a bit of a challenge, but I'm confident this team can still accomplish its goals this season. I believe this year will be different, and I'm excited to be at the Doyt next week.

Beat EKU.
BGSU '20
User avatar
kdog27
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 7154
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:35 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: @UCLA (9/3)

Post by kdog27 »

mbenecke wrote: Sat Sep 03, 2022 6:49 pm
mbenecke wrote: Mon Aug 29, 2022 8:11 am Finally game week!

I agree with the sentiment above that it probably won't be close, but I expect that every time we play P5 schools. Until proven otherwise that we can CONSISTENTLY hang, that's just kinda reality/my expectation for us.

I'm also thinking something along the lines of 45-17 or something like that. It's just too much to handle in Week 1, and I don't see us scoring much.

If we're competitive in the 2nd half, that could mean big things for this year. Looking forward to watching this one. I hope to see a disciplined football team with some fight in them.

I believe it's a 2:30pm (EST) kickoff on the PAC 12 Network, for those planning to watch.
Let the record show that I picked 45-17 back on Monday this week. Lol

I think we're gonna be alright. We were competitive for a half and then ran out of gas against a much more talented and deeper P5 squad. I don't think anyone should be surprised by anything today. I think we're being somewhat prisoners of the moment, and that has extra emphasis because we started hot and led 17-7.

We obviously need to get a lot better, and next week could be a bit of a challenge, but I'm confident this team can still accomplish its goals this season. I believe this year will be different, and I'm excited to be at the Doyt next week.

Beat EKU.
I tend to be with critical thinker, if you told me we lost 45-17 yesterday I’d probably be optimistic. Problem is UCLA s**t the bed for a quarter and a half. And when they were done shitting the bed we never scored again.
User avatar
roguewarrior
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1182
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:54 pm

Re: @UCLA (9/3)

Post by roguewarrior »

More good news ….. our starting Center transfer-in is ineligible for the season because his transfer paperwork was F-D up……
It’s not my point of view, it’s a fact.
fanatic13
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 781
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:33 pm

Re: @UCLA (9/3)

Post by fanatic13 »

roguewarrior wrote: Sat Sep 03, 2022 7:31 pm More good news ….. our starting Center transfer-in is ineligible for the season because his transfer paperwork was F-D up……
What the hell?

I would like my cookie for also picking the score correctly. Hard to determine a lot from this game as someone that was at the 2013 Indiana game. One thing I can say is Matt mcdonald still isn't it and I like our defensive potential.

It was absolutely BRUTAL there today and that attendance number was generous
User avatar
roguewarrior
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1182
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:54 pm

Re: @UCLA (9/3)

Post by roguewarrior »

Hottest game ever in rose bowl …112. I’m laying in my hotel room… they gave like 9 IV’s at halftime. Someone said hottest game ever ??
It’s not my point of view, it’s a fact.
guest44
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 3376
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 3:27 pm

Re: @UCLA (9/3)

Post by guest44 »

roguewarrior wrote: Sat Sep 03, 2022 7:31 pm More good news ….. our starting Center transfer-in is ineligible for the season because his transfer paperwork was F-D up……
So, it’s not good when you spend the entire summer without a Compliance Director? Maybe Kit & Bob should have had him focused more on eligibility and less on trying to kill NIL announcements with local media.
User avatar
Schadenfreude
Professional tractor puller
Professional tractor puller
Posts: 6983
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
Location: Colorado

Re: @UCLA (9/3)

Post by Schadenfreude »

fanatic13 wrote: Sat Sep 03, 2022 7:54 pm
It was absolutely BRUTAL there today and that attendance number was generous
True, this. We could hear easily coaches hollering at players from the 25th row.

As for Jaraki Robinson: Huge loss. In the postgame, Loeffler expressed hope the NCAA would “do the right thing” and that Robinson had put a ton of work in during the off-season, both in football and in life. But maybe he was trying to sell there. It didn’t sound final in the postgame, but Rogue obviously has excellent sources.
User avatar
roguewarrior
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1182
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:54 pm

Re: @UCLA (9/3)

Post by roguewarrior »

I heard about Robinson from parents at the tailgate…. , so it is possible some appeal could work?? Also, Osborn has a chance to make it back late season, clean break in his shoulder.
It’s not my point of view, it’s a fact.
User avatar
jpfalcon09
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8477
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:32 pm
Location: Detroit Beach, MI

Re: @UCLA (9/3)

Post by jpfalcon09 »

guest44 wrote: Sat Sep 03, 2022 8:02 pm
roguewarrior wrote: Sat Sep 03, 2022 7:31 pm More good news ….. our starting Center transfer-in is ineligible for the season because his transfer paperwork was F-D up……
So, it’s not good when you spend the entire summer without a Compliance Director? Maybe Kit & Bob should have had him focused more on eligibility and less on trying to kill NIL announcements with local media.
Or perhaps Memphis made a mistake. We don't know any facts.
The longer the walk, the farther you crawl.
User avatar
jpfalcon09
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8477
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:32 pm
Location: Detroit Beach, MI

Re: @UCLA (9/3)

Post by jpfalcon09 »

roguewarrior wrote: Sat Sep 03, 2022 8:14 pm I heard about Robinson from parents at the tailgate…. , so it is possible some appeal could work?? Also, Osborn has a chance to make it back late season, clean break in his shoulder.
If Robinson can't play all bets are off. Zimmerly is a great story but he's not an FBS caliber center. Really disappointing all around.
The longer the walk, the farther you crawl.
Post Reply