BGDrew wrote:
A -- What do you call Oklahoma and Wisconsin?
B -- Bernie Kosar
C -- The guy was injured for 3 of the games this season. Assuming he throws for 300/game for those he would have thrown for nearly 3400 yards (would have been good enough for top ten in the nation)
D -- He might have some learning to do as far as audibling goes, but let's not forget that he always had at least 4 WRs per play. Being able to check down wide receivers is a skill that's hard to teach at the pro level.
Matt Leinart will be a bust, mark my words.
A -- I call that two solid teams. Now list the solid teams other guys with messed up mechanics played (Vince Young or Phillip Rivers, for example). Playing Oklahoma and Wisonsin each once doesn't mean you played strong competition.
B -- Bernie, ok, you named one from The U. Want me to name a whole bunch of guys with normal throwing motions? Bernie is an exception, not a rule.
C -- I know he was hurt, hence the lukewarm numbers compared to his previous year. As for the other poster who said many QBs would kill for those "lukewarm" numbers -- I'm sure a lot of QB's would kill for Omar's offense and competition too.
D -- having 4 receiver sets is a bad thing for a QB prospect, especially in a lower rated conference and always in the shotgun. If they based it on things like this -- David Klingler would be a stud. Hell every QB from Houston would be a stud.
Matt Leinart -- you think he's a bust, fine -- your opinion. I'll make a bet with you -- if Omar has a better career in the NFL, I'll quit posting for good. If Leinart does, you quit posting for good.
Deal?
FROM YOUR LAST POST:
A -- And Nuclear Bombs. You simply said he hadn't faced good competition and I gave you two examples of some pretty good football teams that Omar had good games against. Hell, the guy had a pretty good game in his first ever start AT OKLAHOMA.
B -- Saying Omar will fail because of mechanics and Young will succeed is BS. They both have "bad mechanics." I still haven't seen a QB who gets the ball out quicker than Omar.
C -- Let's be honest, MAC has not equaled great defenses as of late. If you think that Omar couldn't put up at least 300 against Kent State you're an idiot.
D -- No, but decent feet, great accuracy, an above average long ball, and a smart football player will get him drafted.
A -- addressed above.
B -- The difference is, Vince Young played awesome competition, is a better athlete, has more upside, etc. He's big time. His main question mark is his mechanics, Omar has many other question marks (offense, competition, etc).
C -- agree with you.
D -- agree.
). Please. Most of you are either blowhards, or still frustrated from last season. Thats great if you can't help but feel that way, but don't make all BG fans look like reactionary morons by contributing your bloviating to this forum over, and over, and over again. People like Hammb can at least make a reasoned argument. Most of you can't. Why don't you try supporting your fellow alumni and at least 
