MotownFalcon wrote:BGSUfanatUT wrote:
try to snag:
Troy(assuming this year isnt a one hit wonder)
Navy (a team on the ride, without a conf.)
Temple (?????)
So. Miss
S. Fla
I don't know about you guys, but I do NOT think that Temple would be a good pick-up for the MAC. We need teams that help raise the level of play in the conference. We already have too many basement dwellers IMHO. I do think the other teams BGFAUT listed though would be good additions.
That was why I added the "?????" I THink temple is a bad team. And I dotn want them, but a lto of people do, and they are in a large market area, and maybe playing teams that arent as big physically, they could get on their feet again. Of course if this happened, they would still get bombed by every team in the new uber conference.
I added all those southern teams, b/c they (sorta) are in an area of each other. there would for sure be 1 or 2 teams that clearly wouldnt fir in that southern division, but if you did it that way, the divisions would be lopsided. It would be nice if we could lure a lower tier school out of a bigger conf, with the idea of revmaping the MAC completely. If we drop like 7 teams, and agree to add 7, I bet we could intheory snap a northwestern, or a team like that, I think they would be competitive in the MAC, they may even like the idea of having a chance to win a conf title. Who knows. I figure the only way this has a shot is if all the teams in question will do it based on if the other teams do. I doubt anyone would join unless all the others agreed to as well.
But the BcS has to go in order for that. The worst team in a BcS conf is viewed as better than the top team in a mid major conf right now, and that is wrong.