Globetrotter wrote:hammb wrote:Flipper wrote:This is in no way, shape or form a "lateral move". It's a bigger school, a better conference, a bigger media market and a much bigger paycheck.
Agreed.
The thing I find funny, though, is that SDSU jumped on the coach du jour. Brady Hoke is nothing special as a coach. He lucked into a superstar recruit when BG, UT, and many other schools backed off Davis because of academic issues.
If Davis doesn't make it as an NFL player (he should be a 2nd/3rd rounder, so he'll get a good paycheck), I think Brady owes him some of that coin.
Did he also luck into Dantel Love, Darius Hill and their RB?
I don't know, but I don't think it matters. Nate Davis is the heart & soul of that team and has been all season long. When he finally had a bad game they lost.
Look, I wish Hoke well, and he might do well, but I don't see him as the next Urban Meyer or anything. He's a decent coach, but nothing special. He's only had 2 winning seasons in 6 years in Muncie (one of which was 7-6), and those happened to coincide with Nate Davis developing into the best player in the MAC. Kudos to him for recruiting him, and kudos to him for helping him develop into the player he is, but I have not seen enough from BSU over the years to think Brady Hoke is the next great head coach that will be flying up the ladder.
If Nate Davis was a 4.0 student with a 30 on his ACT he would have been playing at either BG, UT, or perhaps even a Big 10 school. Without Nate Davis Ball State is a mediocre MAC team and Brady Hoke is not getting a promotion, heck he might be getting fired for having gone 6 years without a winning season.
I'm glad to see him doing well, but I don't see him as nearly the coach as Gill, Meyer, or Kelly. IMO, Brady Hoke owes his newfound salary to Nate Davis' dyslexia.