Honest Opinions on the New Logo/Font for BGSU

Discussion of the Falcon football team.
Falconboy
John Lovett's Successor
John Lovett's Successor
Posts: 5357
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Columbus
Contact:

Fonts , logs and new falcon head okay to me

Post by Falconboy »

Not bad. I think that this is an improvement over what we we've had so I'm not complaining. The new falcon head is pretty cool too. If you have actually seen a real peregrine falcon , they do have a brown mark on the face like the one they've depicted on the new falcon head design. Very interesting. :D And they didn't do any MAJOR distortions to what we had the original falcon head either. I think even you "old school" types will grow to like the new fonts and falcon head.

falconboy :supz:
Mid-2000's Anderson Animal
User avatar
Schadenfreude
Professional tractor puller
Professional tractor puller
Posts: 6983
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
Location: Colorado

Post by Schadenfreude »

These are my thoughts:

First, I agree with NWLB said about the process. Krebs, J.D. and others handled this superbly.

Second, they got most of this right. They embraced our wonderfully distinctive colors rather than hiding from them. And they came up with a great new font. It is contemporary, it is bold and I think it will age well.

Now, on the new retail mark:

I LOVE it! I do. This is no small furry animal. It is astract, just like our old logo was. I'd argue this new logo is really just a three-dimensional rendering of our traditional two-dimensional logo.

Also, I disagree with those who think the retail logo somehow apes what they have at Miami. Not at all. It is pretty clear to me that we came to this independently.

Look at the differences:


Image.... Image

Their logo is far more realistic. Look at the beak. Look at the eyes.

I like what we came up with better.

In fact... if they want to throw it on the helmets in '05... that would be fine with me.

I think most of us are going to get used to this in a hurry.

It would bother me if I thought we were tinkering with the logo just to do it -- because that would mean we might have to adjust to another logo in a couple of years.

It's hard to argue that's the case. Look at all the work that went into crafting that new logo, I'm thinking we are going to stick with what the committee came up with for a long time.

And, with that in mind, I don't mind switching. This new logo is probably better than what we have now.

Now I wouldn't argue everything is perfect.

I understand why they retooled the traditional logo, to set up an evolution to the retail logo. But, artistically, that extra blob of color takes it a step backward in my mind. I wouldn't want that extra blob of color marring up our helmets, for instance.

The only real disaster I see are these interlocking BGs I see in the .pdf file:

http://www.fansonly.com/photos/schools/ ... /logos.pdf

Those look like crap.

But most of this is very, very good stuff.
User avatar
Falcon Fanatic
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 6798
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:23 pm
Location: BG

Re: Fonts , logs and new falcon head okay to me

Post by Falcon Fanatic »

falconboy wrote:I think even you "old school" types will grow to like the new fonts and falcon head.
"Old School Types"????.....uh, excuse me??? :roll:

I think it is more that we will all get used to seeing it, rather than "grow to like it." 8)
"Regarding BGSU, I would think their biggest strength is that they never give up, They never slow down and they battle hard even after the other team scores. We have to be on our game and never, ever take the foot off the gas for a second."
~~USCHO Poster
"BG was relentless. It's like they know that a good first pass on the breakout from a defenseman will almost always result in an odd-man rush against them - but they go in anyway and dare you to make that pass. All three of their goals were just grit and effort. That's a team any fan can be proud to support...they give all they've got."
~~USCHO Poster, AFTER Tech beat us
#NeverGiveUp
#NeverSurrender
#Relentless
#Resiliant
Post Reply