05-06 Football Depth Chart

Warthog · Post by **Warthog** » Wed Feb 09, 2005 1:04 pm

I think Haneline will seem some time at LB as well.

SuperFan_FutureGrad · Post by **SuperFan_FutureGrad** » Wed Feb 09, 2005 1:59 pm

Also at TE, Sean O'Drobinak. Didn't mean to forget him on my previous list.

If John Lanning does have a successful return from his knee injury, possibly see Jonathan Culp at RG, or Pat Watson who went in when Grubb went down at the GMAC game.

BelieveNBG · Post by **BelieveNBG** » Wed Feb 09, 2005 2:30 pm

factman wrote:QB
1. Omar Jacobs
1a. Anthony Turner

RB
1. P.J. Pope

WR
1. Charles Sanders
1. Steve Sanders

Hope I was of some help.

I am still trying to figure out who this Charles Sanders guy is.

And you call yourself "factman".

hmmm.

transfer2BGSU · Post by **transfer2BGSU** » Wed Feb 09, 2005 3:33 pm

BelieveNBG wrote:I am still trying to figure out who this Charles Sanders guy is. And you call yourself "factman". hmmm.

I knew what he meant - it's Steve Sharon

BelieveNBG · Post by **BelieveNBG** » Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:54 pm

transfer2BGSU wrote:
BelieveNBG wrote:I am still trying to figure out who this Charles Sanders guy is. And you call yourself "factman". hmmm.
I knew what he meant - it's Steve Sharon

Oh yeah, he's the guy that hangs out with BJ Pope and PJ Lane.

OptionQB · Post by **OptionQB** » Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:57 pm

I will do my best and here we go . . . btw, good news about Lanning- Freak!

(Second string in parentheses)

LT- Warren (Nystrom)
LG- Lichtensteiger (Massey)
C- Lanning (Lichtensteiger/Culp)
RG- Watson (Stanford/Fink)
RT- Markray (Aaron Kent)
Z- Marques Parks (Hutcherson/Kennedy)
X- Charles Sharon (Derrick Lett)
QB- Omar (Turner)
RB- Pope (Lane)
H- Partridge (Jones)
E- Sanders (Brantley)
TE- O'Drobinak (Ruiz)

DE- Mack (Schaeffer)
DT- Williams (Cooley)
NG- Thaler (Davis/Curtis)
DE- Parks (Briggs)
SAM- White (Sharpe)
MIKE- Piepkow (Haneline)
WILL- Winovich (Goodwin)
CB- Jordan (Dozier)
FS- I really hope Perry, but as of now Arnold (Waldron)
SS- Crumpler (Hargrove)
CB- Mayberry (Simonton)
Nickel- Nicholson (Jackson/Myles/Hood)

kdog27 · Post by **kdog27** » Wed Feb 09, 2005 7:36 pm

OptionQB wrote:I will do my best and here we go . . . btw, good news about Lanning- Freak!

(Second string in parentheses)

LT- Warren (Nystrom)
LG- Lichtensteiger (Massey)
C- Lanning (Lichtensteiger/Culp)
RG- Watcson (Stanford/Fink)
RT- Markray (Aaron Kent)
Z- Marques Parks (Hutcherson/Kennedy)
X- Charles Sharon (Derrick Lett)
QB- Omar (Turner)
RB- Pope (Lane)
H- Partridge (Jones)
E- Sanders (Brantley)
TE- O'Drobinak (Ruiz)

DE- Mack (Schaeffer)
DT- Williams (Cooley)
NG- Thaler (Davis/Curtis)
DE- Parks (Briggs)
SAM- White (Sharpe)
MIKE- Piepkow (Haneline)
WILL- Winovich (Goodwin)
CB- Jordan (Dozier)
FS- I really hope Perry, but as of now Arnold (Waldron)
SS- Crumpler (Hargrove)
CB- Mayberry (Simonton)
Nickel- Nicholson (Jackson/Myles/Hood)

I am really concerned about our defense next season. There are a lot of unproven players and when you go to 2 deep it gets real bad.

OptionQB · Post by **OptionQB** » Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:04 pm

Who's unproven in the defense? And the two deep is loaded with RS-Fr but this is one of the better classes in our history athletically, so I think we'll be just fine. I do worry if we can score more than Jordan and Mayberry WILL give up against Boise and teams with athletic receivers.

Dayons_Den · Post by **Dayons_Den** » Wed Feb 09, 2005 11:15 pm

This original post smelled of spam that is why some of my guesses were ... ummm out there.... BJ Pope is still a beast in the backfield though!!!

kdog27 · Post by **kdog27** » Wed Feb 09, 2005 11:25 pm

OptionQB wrote:Who's unproven in the defense? And the two deep is loaded with RS-Fr but this is one of the better classes in our history athletically, so I think we'll be just fine. I do worry if we can score more than Jordan and Mayberry WILL give up against Boise and teams with athletic receivers.

Mack, Winovich, Arnold, and Nicholson haven't proven much to me. That's more than 1/3 of the starters. Add that to our suspect secondary and I worry.

FlippinFalconFan · Post by **FlippinFalconFan** » Wed Feb 09, 2005 11:33 pm

the defense is obviously what has been holding us back and i agree with sayin our defense is unproven because even the guys that are returning starters didnt prove much last season considering out secondary was bad last year and will get only worse without keon in there to take pressure off of them....we cant expect the offense to score on every possession even though we all know they got that potential but at least we return the bulk of our defense in the middle with piepkow parks williams and thaler

BelieveNBG · Post by **BelieveNBG** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 9:26 am

OptionQB wrote:Who's unproven in the defense? And the two deep is loaded with RS-Fr but this is one of the better classes in our history athletically, so I think we'll be just fine. I do worry if we can score more than Jordan and Mayberry WILL give up against Boise and teams with athletic receivers.

That's no worry at all. Bigger worry is at linebacker and safety. Safeties need to be in position to "help" stop the deep ball and linebackers need to be able to drop back and cover the short stuff (didn't do well in that area last year). The other issue is stopping the running game.

Overall, we still had a pretty good defense. They held several teams to less than 20 points which is no small feat.

kdog27 · Post by **kdog27** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 10:03 am

BelieveNBG wrote:
OptionQB wrote:Who's unproven in the defense? And the two deep is loaded with RS-Fr but this is one of the better classes in our history athletically, so I think we'll be just fine. I do worry if we can score more than Jordan and Mayberry WILL give up against Boise and teams with athletic receivers.
That's no worry at all. Bigger worry is at linebacker and safety. Safeties need to be in position to "help" stop the deep ball and linebackers need to be able to drop back and cover the short stuff (didn't do well in that area last year). The other issue is stopping the running game.

Overall, we still had a pretty good defense. They held several teams to less than 20 points which is no small feat.

We held a bunch of nobodies under 20 points though.
Vs. Oklahoma, NIU, Marshall, UT, and Memphis we gave up 40, 34, 35, 49, and 35 respectively. We cannot keep the good teams from scoring 30+ and that is where all three losses took place.

BelieveNBG · Post by **BelieveNBG** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 10:35 am

We held a bunch of nobodies under 20 points though.
Vs. Oklahoma, NIU, Marshall, UT, and Memphis we gave up 40, 34, 35, 49, and 35 respectively. We cannot keep the good teams from scoring 30+ and that is where all three losses took place.

Oklahoma...need I say more.

NIU...our offense was not stellar that day either (7 pts. in one half, 3 in 3rd quarter).

UT...our offense scored a bunch, yes, and then disappeared leaving the defense on a very short field for most of the 2nd half, including turnover and missed field goal at crucial point of game. Yes, the defense had miscues too. Don't forget, UT also scored alot on mostly everybody, including scoring more against NIU than our offense did.

Marshall...defense played well when it counted and got the stops when they needed to. Defense played a darn good 2nd half with 7 of those 15 pts. coming when game was already over.

Memphis has a high scoring offense that scored in bunches against many teams, but they only got 7 in 2nd half when game was over.

SuperFan_FutureGrad · Thu Feb 10, 2005 10:53 am

Great post BelieveNBG!

05-06 Football Depth Chart

DISCLAIMER