Hell yeah we've improved...
UMass Game
- Flipper
- The Global Village Idiot

- Posts: 18315
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:01 am
- Location: Ida Twp, MI
Re: UMass Game
Week one they looked confused on every level...week five the front seven played pretty well and the secondary appeared to be...at several points...completely incompetent.
Hell yeah we've improved...
Hell yeah we've improved...
It's not the fall that hurts...it's when you hit the ground.
- Globetrotter
- Turbo

- Posts: 11315
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:17 am
Re: UMass Game
I hope you are right. I just don't know though. Are we switching up players? Are we adjusting the schemes at all. Or are we simply saying what I am doing will work we just need to get going with it.MarkL wrote:Yet for mid third to mid fourth they shut UMass out. It was a mix of better scheme (hey coaches!!) and better play. They CAN play well but I've not seen a consistent effort even in a game yet. I do believe the D will continue to improve as the year goes on. And they also started at a low, low point so improvement is necessary. Secondary needs to play tighter so the front seven doesn't have to bail them out all the time.Globetrotter wrote:They had 630+ yards.MarkL wrote:I wholeheartedly disagree. Week 1 I couldn't tell what our scheme was. We look disorganized, almost like chickens with their heads cut off running around. This week I can tell what we were doing. I could see the pressures we were bringing and the coverage. If we were healthy, we may be far better but we aren't so young guys are getting time and learning the schemes and the pace of the game. If we play like we did mid third to mid fourth on D, we'll be fine. Problem is we got away from that scheme late in the game and nearly coughed up the lead.jpfalcon09 wrote:I don't see any improvement from Week 1 to Week 4.
- Falconfreak90
- Rubber City Falcon

- Posts: 18498
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:28 am
- Location: Green, OH
- Contact:
Re: UMass Game
My biggest beef is how some of the players, not all, but some are carrying themselves on the field. The arrogance is unacceptable.
Michael W.
BGSU-12 TIME MAC CHAMPION
FALCON FOOTBALL ROCKS!
BGSU-12 TIME MAC CHAMPION
FALCON FOOTBALL ROCKS!
Re: UMass Game
Scheme is definitely changed. I couldn't for the life of me tell what our scheme was week one. If I could chart it out when WKU was on offense and we were on defense ...Globetrotter wrote:I hope you are right. I just don't know though. Are we switching up players? Are we adjusting the schemes at all. Or are we simply saying what I am doing will work we just need to get going with it.MarkL wrote:Yet for mid third to mid fourth they shut UMass out. It was a mix of better scheme (hey coaches!!) and better play. They CAN play well but I've not seen a consistent effort even in a game yet. I do believe the D will continue to improve as the year goes on. And they also started at a low, low point so improvement is necessary. Secondary needs to play tighter so the front seven doesn't have to bail them out all the time.Globetrotter wrote:They had 630+ yards.MarkL wrote:I wholeheartedly disagree. Week 1 I couldn't tell what our scheme was. We look disorganized, almost like chickens with their heads cut off running around. This week I can tell what we were doing. I could see the pressures we were bringing and the coverage. If we were healthy, we may be far better but we aren't so young guys are getting time and learning the schemes and the pace of the game. If we play like we did mid third to mid fourth on D, we'll be fine. Problem is we got away from that scheme late in the game and nearly coughed up the lead.jpfalcon09 wrote:I don't see any improvement from Week 1 to Week 4.
.......................
........
.............................................................
.......
..................
...................................................................
Today, there was significant improvement to more like ...
........................................................
........
.............................................................
.......
..................
...................................................................
So yeah ... improvement ... but you can see where the problem remains clearly in my chart up here. Need more
OK, I've had my fun for the day
MarkL has spoken.
You may all now return to your daily lives.
You may all now return to your daily lives.
Re: UMass Game
Congratulations on the win. You've been at the top tier in the MAC since we got here. Know you guys expect more. Last year you guys were blowing us out. Good luck and we'll have one more shot at you next year.
- Globetrotter
- Turbo

- Posts: 11315
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:17 am
Re: UMass Game
I think we need post hall of fame....this should go in. Hilarious.MarkL wrote:Scheme is definitely changed. I couldn't for the life of me tell what our scheme was week one. If I could chart it out when WKU was on offense and we were on defense ...Globetrotter wrote:I hope you are right. I just don't know though. Are we switching up players? Are we adjusting the schemes at all. Or are we simply saying what I am doing will work we just need to get going with it.MarkL wrote:Yet for mid third to mid fourth they shut UMass out. It was a mix of better scheme (hey coaches!!) and better play. They CAN play well but I've not seen a consistent effort even in a game yet. I do believe the D will continue to improve as the year goes on. And they also started at a low, low point so improvement is necessary. Secondary needs to play tighter so the front seven doesn't have to bail them out all the time.Globetrotter wrote:They had 630+ yards.MarkL wrote:I wholeheartedly disagree. Week 1 I couldn't tell what our scheme was. We look disorganized, almost like chickens with their heads cut off running around. This week I can tell what we were doing. I could see the pressures we were bringing and the coverage. If we were healthy, we may be far better but we aren't so young guys are getting time and learning the schemes and the pace of the game. If we play like we did mid third to mid fourth on D, we'll be fine. Problem is we got away from that scheme late in the game and nearly coughed up the lead.jpfalcon09 wrote:I don't see any improvement from Week 1 to Week 4.
..............................................................................................
![]()
............................
.....................
...........................
................................
![]()
.............................................................![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
....................................................
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
...............................................
![]()
...................................................................................................................................
![]()
...................................................................![]()
Today, there was significant improvement to more like ...
..................................................................................
![]()
...........................................................
![]()
![]()
................................................
![]()
.............................................................![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
....................................................
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
...............................................
![]()
...................................................................................................................................
![]()
...................................................................![]()
So yeah ... improvement ... but you can see where the problem remains clearly in my chart up here. Need moreand I believe you'll see a whole lot more
in the future instead of
![]()
![]()
OK, I've had my fun for the day
Re: UMass Game
I'm calling for losses to Ohio, Toledo and Akron. We'll beat Buffalo and probably Kent State, and WMU and Ball State are toss-ups. Five games and that's where I stand. I get that our defense is going to be on the field more and will yield more yards because of our offense, but they are simply being shredded!!! We're allowing twice the yardage as we did a season ago. I could see allowing 100-150 ypg more but 300 ypg more??? We're just not getting better or making improvements and it will, not maybe - it will - cost us .Falconfreak90 wrote:Lucked out today. WMU, Toledo and Akron will beat this team if we continue to play like this....maybe Ohio and UB. I'm glad we won but man are we in trouble.
GO BG!!!
Re: UMass Game
Gotta wonder what his status is with the team at this point. He could be hurt, suspended, gone fromthe team, and we'll probably never know.Flipper wrote:And what's up with Mike Minns...he was a 2nd team DT at the end of the year and he hasn't played a down...
GO BG!!!
Re: UMass Game
We also need to get the penalties cleaned up. All kinds of mistakes and some stupid ones from guys who should know better.
GO BG!!!
- Flipper
- The Global Village Idiot

- Posts: 18315
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:01 am
- Location: Ida Twp, MI
Re: UMass Game
We'll beat OU and Akron...Toledo..maybe. None of these teams are good. truthfully...I could see us winning them all and losing them all....we're just so sloppy.
It's not the fall that hurts...it's when you hit the ground.
Re: UMass Game
We are a 500 team at best. We just cannot stop ANYBODY….
- Schadenfreude
- Professional tractor puller

- Posts: 6983
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
- Location: Colorado
Re: UMass Game
Yeah, this belongs in a AZZ.com hall of fame. Hilarious!MarkL wrote:
Scheme is definitely changed. I couldn't for the life of me tell what our scheme was week one. If I could chart it out when WKU was on offense and we were on defense ...
..............................................................................................
![]()
............................
.....................
...........................
................................
![]()
.............................................................![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
....................................................
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
...............................................
![]()
...................................................................................................................................
![]()
...................................................................![]()
Today, there was significant improvement to more like ...
..................................................................................
![]()
...........................................................
![]()
![]()
................................................
![]()
.............................................................![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
....................................................
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
...............................................
![]()
...................................................................................................................................
![]()
...................................................................![]()
So yeah ... improvement ... but you can see where the problem remains clearly in my chart up here. Need moreand I believe you'll see a whole lot more
in the future instead of
![]()
![]()
OK, I've had my fun for the day
Re: UMass Game
Can't imagine what any player has to be arrogant about.Falconfreak90 wrote:My biggest beef is how some of the players, not all, but some are carrying themselves on the field. The arrogance is unacceptable.



