MotownFalcon wrote:All I have to say is that if Leady was poppin' off at the mouth about AT's eligibility, I hope that when he is playing for Cinncy, we get to play them, and one of our D-lineman pops him good!
First of all, what do you expect from an Eastwood player!
Secondly, this kid is still verballed to us. Sure its soft, but so are ALL verbals at this time, IMO. He wants to look at other schools and keep his options open. At this time in the year, I can certainly understand that. It certainly doesn't help our case of keeping him in the fold if we're all bashing him because he says he's a soft verbal.
Heck his commitment to BG made the top page news of Bucknuts.com. Leady is still a good player, that with or without AT we want at BG.
I agree with those who are aggravated that a guy can say he's a verbal in one sentence and then talk about how he's intrigued with another school in the next.
Soft verbal. That must be what Boozer gave to the Cavaliers. Sorta my word, but don't hold me to it.
Carlos User? Anyone else notice that the Cavaliers host Utah on March 15th? Et tu Boozer?
Carlos Boozer
the prospect of the first game against the jazz makes me think of that last second shot by ehlo against the jazz abotu 88 or 89...i can still hear joe tait's call. "yes, virginia, there is a santa claus, and he come from lubbock texas1'
hammb wrote:
First of all, what do you expect from an Eastwood player!
Secondly, this kid is still verballed to us. Sure its soft, but so are ALL verbals at this time, IMO. He wants to look at other schools and keep his options open. At this time in the year, I can certainly understand that. It certainly doesn't help our case of keeping him in the fold if we're all bashing him because he says he's a soft verbal.
Heck his commitment to BG made the top page news of Bucknuts.com. Leady is still a good player, that with or without AT we want at BG.
Good point Hammb...Hopefully the kid was either mistaken, or just got a hold of some bad info.
[/quote]