GAME ON

Discussion of the Falcon football team.
Post Reply
User avatar
jpfalcon09
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8477
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:32 pm
Location: Detroit Beach, MI

Re: GAME ON

Post by jpfalcon09 »

gmartin wrote:Negativity about coaching. Personally I think there isn't enough negatively. We had a top defense last year. This coaching staff ruined that. Yes we lost players but we went from one of the best to the worst rushing defense in the nation.
The defense is not as good as everyone thinks. It's deep up the middle at LB but the line hasn't nearly done enough to get pressure and the secondary has played loose coverage all season.
The longer the walk, the farther you crawl.
User avatar
Schadenfreude
Professional tractor puller
Professional tractor puller
Posts: 6983
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
Location: Colorado

Re: GAME ON

Post by Schadenfreude »

gmartin wrote:Negativity about coaching. Personally I think there isn't enough negatively. We had a top defense last year. This coaching staff ruined that. Yes we lost players but we went from one of the best to the worst rushing defense in the nation.
The last drive was painful to watch, but this defense is playing hard. They've been on the field about 75 percent of the time. I don't blame the defense for this situation.
User avatar
kdog27
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 7154
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:35 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: GAME ON

Post by kdog27 »

Schadenfreude wrote:Too much negativity in this thread about coaching. If Johnson is under center this team is leading at the half. The coaches aren't perfect but they are trying. Clever drive at the end there.
Plenty of teams lose a QB and move forward. We have 6 good receivers and 3 good running backs to work with. There is no reason to look this bad offensively after losing your starting QB 12 games ago.
User avatar
hammb
The Stabber of Cherries
The Stabber of Cherries
Posts: 14322
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:21 am
Location: Bowling Green

Re: GAME ON

Post by hammb »

jpfalcon09 wrote:
gmartin wrote:Negativity about coaching. Personally I think there isn't enough negatively. We had a top defense last year. This coaching staff ruined that. Yes we lost players but we went from one of the best to the worst rushing defense in the nation.
The defense is not as good as everyone thinks. It's deep up the middle at LB but the line hasn't nearly done enough to get pressure and the secondary has played loose coverage all season.
Which wouldn't be a problem if they would actually tackle somebody when playing off. You can give up short completions, you cannot allow the wr to lower their shoulder and turn them into first downs all the time.

Our secondary is, and has been, a weakness all year. And not surprisingly that's the unit that lost the most talent.
User avatar
Flipper
The Global Village Idiot
The Global Village Idiot
Posts: 18317
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:01 am
Location: Ida Twp, MI

Re: GAME ON

Post by Flipper »

We didn't stop a decent rushing offense last year. Toledo and Pitt especially killed us.

Knapke has struggled all year...even against IU. There were a lot of instances where his WR's bailed him out in that game
It's not the fall that hurts...it's when you hit the ground.
User avatar
hammb
The Stabber of Cherries
The Stabber of Cherries
Posts: 14322
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:21 am
Location: Bowling Green

Re: GAME ON

Post by hammb »

kdog27 wrote:
Schadenfreude wrote:Too much negativity in this thread about coaching. If Johnson is under center this team is leading at the half. The coaches aren't perfect but they are trying. Clever drive at the end there.
Plenty of teams lose a QB and move forward. We have 6 good receivers and 3 good running backs to work with. There is no reason to look this bad offensively after losing your starting QB 12 games ago.
Sure there is. Our backup qb came out ok but once teams watched some film on him they've shut him down entirely. I suppose you could say we should have gone to another qb, but I really don't know what people expect the staff to do. Our qb freezes in face of pressure, cannot accurately throw anything beyond 5 yards, and doesn't see the field. I suppose they could abandon it all and just run the ball every down, but then everyone would be whining they're not throwing enough.

No matter how much football changes you cannot overcome poor qb play unless you're remarkably dominant on the ol and defense...and those units aren't good enough to overcome it. When Knapke was playing well we were winning some games. No doubt I think the coaches need to improve on some things, but it still think we have a talent issue more than anything right now.
User avatar
Schadenfreude
Professional tractor puller
Professional tractor puller
Posts: 6983
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
Location: Colorado

Re: GAME ON

Post by Schadenfreude »

So do you pull Knapke at this point?
User avatar
kdog27
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 7154
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:35 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: GAME ON

Post by kdog27 »

hammb wrote:
kdog27 wrote:
Schadenfreude wrote:Too much negativity in this thread about coaching. If Johnson is under center this team is leading at the half. The coaches aren't perfect but they are trying. Clever drive at the end there.
Plenty of teams lose a QB and move forward. We have 6 good receivers and 3 good running backs to work with. There is no reason to look this bad offensively after losing your starting QB 12 games ago.
Sure there is. Our backup qb came out ok but once teams watched some film on him they've shut him down entirely. I suppose you could say we should have gone to another qb, but I really don't know what people expect the staff to do. Our qb freezes in face of pressure, cannot accurately throw anything beyond 5 yards, and doesn't see the field. I suppose they could abandon it all and just run the ball every down, but then everyone would be whining they're not throwing enough.

No matter how much football changes you cannot overcome poor qb play unless you're remarkably dominant on the ol and defense...and those units aren't good enough to overcome it. When Knapke was playing well we were winning some games. No doubt I think the coaches need to improve on some things, but it still think we have a talent issue more than anything right now.
Sorry I just think the QB excuse is weak at this point. You can't develop him or at least try a different approach to the offense... yeah I think that is shitty coaching.
User avatar
BGSU33
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 10183
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Boulder, CO

Re: GAME ON

Post by BGSU33 »

Seven damn points, down two scores and they get the ball to start the second half. I've seen nothing from this team in this game or for weeks to believe we're coming back in this one.
GO BG!!!
User avatar
hammb
The Stabber of Cherries
The Stabber of Cherries
Posts: 14322
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:21 am
Location: Bowling Green

Re: GAME ON

Post by hammb »

Schadenfreude wrote:So do you pull Knapke at this point?
I'd consider it, but at the same time I figure if I've watched this all year and still feel he's my best bet, the callaway is probably not going to be an improvement.

Bottom line is Babers needs to recruit qbs heavily...even if Johnson is back we need something better to dpre pare for the future.
tvosra87
Egg
Egg
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 10:52 am

Re: GAME ON

Post by tvosra87 »

Schadenfreude wrote:So do you pull Knapke at this point?
Give one more series to do something, if not then pull him. Idk what his deal is, but he has been throwing guys short all game.
User avatar
Rollo83
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 2383
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 7:27 pm
Location: Strongsville, OH

Re: GAME ON

Post by Rollo83 »

It don't matter...
"Windows are for cheaters, chimneys for the poor.
Closets are for hangers, winners use the door."

-B. Springsteen
User avatar
BGSU33
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 10183
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Boulder, CO

Re: GAME ON

Post by BGSU33 »

Ballgame
GO BG!!!
User avatar
hammb
The Stabber of Cherries
The Stabber of Cherries
Posts: 14322
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:21 am
Location: Bowling Green

Re: GAME ON

Post by hammb »

kdog27 wrote:
hammb wrote:
kdog27 wrote:
Schadenfreude wrote:Too much negativity in this thread about coaching. If Johnson is under center this team is leading at the half. The coaches aren't perfect but they are trying. Clever drive at the end there.
Plenty of teams lose a QB and move forward. We have 6 good receivers and 3 good running backs to work with. There is no reason to look this bad offensively after losing your starting QB 12 games ago.
Sure there is. Our backup qb came out ok but once teams watched some film on him they've shut him down entirely. I suppose you could say we should have gone to another qb, but I really don't know what people expect the staff to do. Our qb freezes in face of pressure, cannot accurately throw anything beyond 5 yards, and doesn't see the field. I suppose they could abandon it all and just run the ball every down, but then everyone would be whining they're not throwing enough.

No matter how much football changes you cannot overcome poor qb play unless you're remarkably dominant on the ol and defense...and those units aren't good enough to overcome it. When Knapke was playing well we were winning some games. No doubt I think the coaches need to improve on some things, but it still think we have a talent issue more than anything right now.
Sorry I just think the QB excuse is weak at this point. You can't develop him or at least try a different approach to the offense... yeah I think that is shitty coaching.
But they HAVE tried a different approach. They've taken the intermediate timing stuff that he cannot do almost entirely out of the playbook. He has a strong arm and we've got some good receivers so we keep letting him take shots deep and get the ball into the wrs hands quickly on screens. We still have been running the ball a ton even though the defense knows we cannot build a rhythm passing game.


This "just develop him" assumes, incorrectly IMO, that it's even possible. I know it's fun to rip the coaches and show nothing but love for the players but it's not fair. And I've never shown an inability to criticize coaches...I just think it's gotten ridiculous at this point how much venom is spewed on Babers, when the players aren't executing worth a damn.
guest44
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 3376
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 3:27 pm

Re: GAME ON

Post by guest44 »

Now let's see how this team plays this game out. This is usually when the players start crowding around the heaters to stay warm.
Post Reply