Ay-Ziggy-Zoomba.com

IMO, Miami is the only MAC school that did great in both men's basketball and football. Ball State did fairly good in both too, and Ohio wasn't too bad. The rest of the MAC is too close for comfort (or below 925) in at least one of those sports. Temple is downright scary. Only 3 of their men's sports teams had an APR score of 925 or higher!!!

Some numbers for MAC schools:

CMU Men's Basketball - 898 (saved by the "squad size" clause)
CMU Football - 907 (saved by the "squad size" clause)

Akron Men's Basketball - 931
Akron Football - 931

Buffalo Men's Basketball - 913 (saved by the "squad size" clause)
Buffalo Football - 878 (loss of 3 scholarships and 3 initial scholarships)
Buffalo Women's Basketball - 904 (saved by the "squad size" clause)

Ball State Men's Basketball - 981 (great score)
Ball State Football - 945 (good score)

EMU Men's Basketball - 858 (no listing by NCAA on a penalty or clause???)
EMU Football - 902 (no listing by NCAA on a penalty or clause???)
Men's indoor and outdoor track and wrestling are also below 925 but saved by the "squad size" clause.

Kent State Men's Basketball - 856 (loss of 2 scholarships)
Kent State Football - 916 (saved by the "squad size" clause)

Ohio Men's Basketball - 962 (pretty good score)
Ohio Football - 936 (just above the standard, not much room to slide)

BG Men's Basketball - 930 (just above the standard, not much room to slide)
BG Football - 920 (saved by the "squad size" clause)

WMU Men's Basketball - 965 (pretty good score)
WMU Football - 878 (loss of 5 scholarships and 3 initial scholarships)

Toledo Men's Basketball - 990 (great score)
Toledo Football - 853 (loss of 6 scholarships and 3 initial scholarships)

NIU Men's Basketball - 938
NIU Football - 905 (loss of 2 scholarships and 2 initial scholarships)

Miami Men's Basketball - 980 (great score)
Miami Football - 964 (pretty good score)


Temple Men's Basketball - 900 (saved by the "squad size" clause)
Temple Football - 837 (loss of 9 scholarships and 3 initial scholarships)
Temple Baseball - 903 (saved by the "squad size" clause)
Temple Men's Golf - 921 (saved by the "squad size" clause)
Temple Men's Soccer - 890 (saved by the "squad size" clause)
Temple Women's B-Ball - 923 (saved by the "squad size" clause)

what about the big ten?

How many different places are you going to post this? The fact of the matter is that Toledo, WMU, Buffalo and Kent have been embarassed by these sanctions. You obviously can't deal with that and are coming off as desperate to take eveyone else down with you. Get over it, because Toledo has a much tougher road to hoe than just about anyone in the conference.

Perhaps your efforts would be more constructive if you spent less time on a BG message board making yourself (and your school) look foolish, and more time expressing the concern you should have to the football coaching staff and administration at UT?

"Smell that, Rabbit?.....Fear."

No matter how you look at it, Toledo is on the list and BG isn't.

BG loses one soccer grant

From the Columbus Dispatch -

...and Bowling Green, which must deduct the equivalent of 0.07 percent of the scholarships it awards in men’s soccer.

http://www.dispatch.com/news-story.php? ... A1-02.html

Germainfitch1 wrote:what about the big ten?

Here's the two you likely wanted to view.

Ohio State Men's Basketball - 911 (saved by squad-size adjustment)
Ohio State Football - 925 (right at the cutoff for losing scholarships)

Michigan Men's Basketball - 964
Michigan Football - 952

The rest can be looked up by clicking this link

And for PGY any other UK fans,
UK Men's Basketball - 922 (saved by squad-size adjustment)
UK Football - 940

rocketfootball wrote:IMO, Miami is the only MAC school that did great...

~REST OF STUPID MEANINGLESS POST REMOVED~

Thanks!!

For those trying to put me down for posting this...........this was purely for informational purposes. I figured you would want to know how the whole MAC stacked up.

I agree that UT has a lot of work to do. But if you don't care to understand that this if for information purposes about all MAC schools and is not to coverup or feel scared about UT, then do us all a favor and don't even read this thread.

rocketfootball wrote:For those trying to put me down for posting this...........this was purely for informational purposes. I figured you would want to know how the whole MAC stacked up.

I agree that UT has a lot of work to do. But if you don't care to understand that this if for information purposes about all MAC schools and is not to coverup or feel scared about UT, then do us all a favor and don't even read this thread.

Nope...we could care less.

Redwingtom wrote:

rocketfootball wrote:For those trying to put me down for posting this...........this was purely for informational purposes. I figured you would want to know how the whole MAC stacked up.

I agree that UT has a lot of work to do. But if you don't care to understand that this if for information purposes about all MAC schools and is not to coverup or feel scared about UT, then do us all a favor and don't even read this thread.

Nope...we could care less.

Is that why BG was voted to having the worst fans in the MAC?

transfer2BGSU wrote:BG loses one soccer grant

From the Columbus Dispatch -

...and Bowling Green, which must deduct the equivalent of 0.07 percent of the scholarships it awards in men’s soccer.

http://www.dispatch.com/news-story.php? ... A1-02.html

That really hurts the program especially since they aren't fully funded.

Who really cares what the Big Ten scores are? We are still in the MAC right?

It's the Journey... wrote:Who really cares what the Big Ten scores are? We are still in the MAC right?

I do.

It's the Journey... wrote:Who really cares what the Big Ten scores are? We are still in the MAC right?

Believe it or not, some people like multiple teams...