Ay-Ziggy-Zoomba.com

At Cleveland Browns Stadium, is the whole field going to have Falcon logos on it since it's considered a "home game." Or since this is a deal between Wisconsin and BG, is one endzone BG and one endzone Wisky. Even if you don't know, I would like to hear your opinion on it.

If there is any indication on the field markings of Wisky's presence heads need to roll in the AD. They had their home game last year.

The Browns have a game at August 31 and then another September 10. I'd say we're stuck with the Browns paint.

There may be no paint at all... which is fine and dandy...

Wasn't there some dome last season (maybe the Georgia Dome) that held the bowl game between Miami and LSU and an Atlanta Falcons football game on the same weekend. I'm sure they could paint it pretty quickly.

As long as the yard markings and hash marks are there, so be it. It would be nice to see the Falcon Head at midfield but with the Browns playing right before, who knows?

I know this....only 37 days to go.

well since the browns and the falcons have the same helmet except we have the falcon logo on it, i dont see how they couldnt paint the falcon on the browns helmet at midfield and then paint over it in orange again, to make it look like the browns helmet after the game. It seems easy enough. What do you guys think?

svillefalcon wrote:well since the browns and the falcons have the same helmet except we have the falcon logo on it, i dont see how they couldnt paint the falcon on the browns helmet at midfield and then paint over it in orange again, to make it look like the browns helmet after the game. It seems easy enough. What do you guys think?

Exactly what I thought.

Also, it is a lot harder to paint grass and change it than it is fake turf, so I think we are "stuck" with the brown and orange motif that NFL team stole from us.

redskins4ever wrote:There may be no paint at all... which is fine and dandy...

This is what I would expect for the end zones. Paint 'em green or orange or whatever.

And I like the idea of plopping our logo on the Browns helmet at midfield. That shouldn't be too hard to paint over.

I'd rather not have anything...this just means that our expenditures are going to outway what we bring in! I love BG, but the OMAR ain't here and we're going to be dealt with by the badgers with no problem...allocate the funds somewhere else!

ChicagoFalcon wrote:I'd rather not have anything...this just means that our expenditures are going to outway what we bring in! I love BG, but the OMAR ain't here and we're going to be dealt with by the badgers with no problem...allocate the funds somewhere else!

You fill a glass up with water. You drink half of it. In my view, it's half full. In your view, the glass is busted in half and needs thrown away.

BGDrew wrote:

ChicagoFalcon wrote:I'd rather not have anything...this just means that our expenditures are going to outway what we bring in! I love BG, but the OMAR ain't here and we're going to be dealt with by the badgers with no problem...allocate the funds somewhere else!

You fill a glass up with water. You drink half of it. In my view, it's half full. In your view, the glass is busted in half and needs thrown away.

I'd say he learned that attitude at UT (along with his spelling), but I doubt this sap even graduated.

We should paint the falcon on the Browns helmet. We just prefice by saying, "hey, you've been copying us for YEARS. Why not give back to the school which started your colors?

Thread split successful.

Let's talk about field logos, M-kay?

What happened to the other posts on this thread?