BG and Omar getting more National attention...

BelieveNBG · Post by **BelieveNBG** » Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:32 pm

Nice, as long as you scroll past the references to the team up North ...

http://msn.foxsports.com/story/3075038

BGSUfanatUT · Post by **BGSUfanatUT** » Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:50 pm

Brucie the best QB right now? Hardly. Have they heard of this one dude...I cant think of it...o yeah KYLE ORTON? maybe his 18-0 TD-INT ration isnt good enough to best brucie?

Warthog · Post by **Warthog** » Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:05 pm

Did you see the score prediction at the end: BG 66, Ball State 14. Sounds about right.

8)

Redwingtom · Post by **Redwingtom** » Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:36 pm

BGSUfanatUT wrote:Brucie the best QB right now? Hardly. Have they heard of this one dude...I cant think of it...o yeah KYLE ORTON? maybe his 18-0 TD-INT ration isnt good enough to best brucie?

Yeah, but Orton has not beaten any good competition yet...when he does then we will talk <end sarcasm>

BGSUfanatUT · Post by **BGSUfanatUT** » Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:54 pm

The ironic part is that is probably exactly why the author of that piece thought. Purdue has played no one...and toledo had to play a tough road game ar KU....

kdog27 · Post by **kdog27** » Wed Oct 13, 2004 5:17 pm

Orton threw his first 2 ints last saturday and had only one TD. Still a 20:2 ratio is nothing to complain about

BGSUfanatUT · Post by **BGSUfanatUT** » Wed Oct 13, 2004 5:26 pm

yeah I read that shortly after my post, but starting out the season with liek 17 TD's in 4 games with no INTs is quite the sick talent

Metz · Post by **Metz** » Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:01 pm

Warthog wrote:Did you see the score prediction at the end: BG 66, Ball State 14. Sounds about right. 8)

I don't know if we will score 66 on them. I'm going to say 54 at most but as long as we win, I'll be happy! Go Falcons!!!

BGSUfanatUT · Post by **BGSUfanatUT** » Thu Oct 14, 2004 7:24 am

i dunno Metz, TT has the worst D in the league stat wise I think, and ive watched their less than stellar pass defense at Toledo....and Chuck, steve, Cole and the lot are a few notches above moore and bruceies crew

Metz · Post by **Metz** » Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:53 am

BGSUfanatUT wrote:i dunno Metz, TT has the worst D in the league stat wise I think, and ive watched their less than stellar pass defense at Toledo....and Chuck, steve, Cole and the lot are a few notches above moore and bruceies crew

I was referring to the BallsTate game. Don't bring turdledo into this...that is just no good.

Redwingtom · Post by **Redwingtom** » Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:01 pm

McMetz811 wrote:
BGSUfanatUT wrote:i dunno Metz, TT has the worst D in the league stat wise I think, and ive watched their less than stellar pass defense at Toledo....and Chuck, steve, Cole and the lot are a few notches above moore and bruceies crew
I was referring to the BallsTate game. Don't bring turdledo into this...that is just no good.

TT = Testicle Tech (aka Ball State)

Metz · Post by **Metz** » Thu Oct 14, 2004 2:02 pm

Redwingtom wrote:
McMetz811 wrote:
BGSUfanatUT wrote:i dunno Metz, TT has the worst D in the league stat wise I think, and ive watched their less than stellar pass defense at Toledo....and Chuck, steve, Cole and the lot are a few notches above moore and bruceies crew
I was referring to the BallsTate game. Don't bring turdledo into this...that is just no good.
TT = Testicle Tech (aka Ball State)

But he said moore and bruceies. I know tu played TT and won 52-14 but I don't like seeing those names while talking about BG. We could just leave it as Chuck, Steve, Cole, and the lot are the best receivers in the nation!!!