Interesting question to poinder 2007
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 11:14 am
A major criticisim of the spread offense is that it is effective for 80 yards and loses that same effectiveness in the red zone b/c routes are shorter and there's not as much ground to cover deep.
With the emergence of Bullock, Freddie and possibly converting Jahmal Brown back to his natural running back position or staying with Winovich and Macon. I have to ask . . . Would BG be better off adding a "wishbone" look to offense in the redzone? Thnik of the possibilities of a running QB, 3 potential home run hitters in the backfield and then going 5 wide on the next play. I think if Brandon wants to investigate the possibilities of a power running game from the spread, this has to be a consideration. The possibilities are endless and it would enable us to go with two different looks into each match-up choosing the one which gives us the best advantage a la the Buckeyes 5 wide against Michigan.
Just a thought.
With the emergence of Bullock, Freddie and possibly converting Jahmal Brown back to his natural running back position or staying with Winovich and Macon. I have to ask . . . Would BG be better off adding a "wishbone" look to offense in the redzone? Thnik of the possibilities of a running QB, 3 potential home run hitters in the backfield and then going 5 wide on the next play. I think if Brandon wants to investigate the possibilities of a power running game from the spread, this has to be a consideration. The possibilities are endless and it would enable us to go with two different looks into each match-up choosing the one which gives us the best advantage a la the Buckeyes 5 wide against Michigan.
Just a thought.