What happened...
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:12 am
...to our offense?
Greg Brandon was supposed to be this "offensive guru" under Urban Meyer. I realize you have to tailor your offense around your talent somewhat, but Brandon pulled a 180 this year. I don't see other programs known for their offensive system, like BYU or Boise State, change their offensive philosophy so drastically from year to year.
These programs recrruit for their systems and plug in new players each year. Of cousre it takes time for the underclassmen to be able to execute like the veterans, but at least they are running the system and getting experience with it.
I didn't see Greg Brandon run "his" offense all year! I saw a coach with a young and mobile quarterback try to call plays that give him the best chance not to make mistakes. To me, that's playing to lose...not to win. Sure, you don't want to hurt a kids confidence, but you got to let him play.
Now next year, Brandon willl try to ask Turner to run more of the wide open offense and Turner will be learning on the job again because he ran mostly QB draws the previous year.
What did Brandon have to lose by letting Turner run the "Omar" offense? What, we goiing to only win three games instead of four? We wasted a entire year on the young people we have on the offensive side of the ball. Did any of our young wiide receivers get any real experience running the spread offense so they can step up next year and be our next Sharon or Sanders? Hardly!
I blame all this on the head coach. Is he so worried about an extra win or two to keep his job? That reminds my of the Knute Cooper years in Columbus.
A couple more thoughts...
Punting Formation - Enough is enough! Even when the kid gets off a punt he has at least one or two defenders bearing down on him. He hasn't had a kick this year where he didn't have some pressure on him from a rush. Its a bad sign when a coach is so stubborn that he won't change something that is clearly broken. Even if you feel that formation is effective, you have to admit that we don't have the players to execute it properly.
Kick-off Return Team - Why does our kickoff return team always have to struggle to get the ball out to the 20 yard line. Our runner has to start dodging tacklers around the ten or fifteen yard line. Is the problem with our return men or the blocking...or coaching?
Kick-off Coverage Team - Why do we kick it short and give opponents the ball at the 35 yard line on average? I guess we are admitting that Big Bird can't reach the end zone and our coverage team can't tackle. We lose at least 15 yards of field position when we start our offense inside our 20 and opponents start at their 35.
Defense - Yes, the defense played better in stretches this year and we do have a core of young players to work with on that side of the ball. But basically, I saw the same poor tackling defense that we have always had under Brandon. A conservative offense and suspect defense is a bad combination.
Greg Brandon was supposed to be this "offensive guru" under Urban Meyer. I realize you have to tailor your offense around your talent somewhat, but Brandon pulled a 180 this year. I don't see other programs known for their offensive system, like BYU or Boise State, change their offensive philosophy so drastically from year to year.
These programs recrruit for their systems and plug in new players each year. Of cousre it takes time for the underclassmen to be able to execute like the veterans, but at least they are running the system and getting experience with it.
I didn't see Greg Brandon run "his" offense all year! I saw a coach with a young and mobile quarterback try to call plays that give him the best chance not to make mistakes. To me, that's playing to lose...not to win. Sure, you don't want to hurt a kids confidence, but you got to let him play.
Now next year, Brandon willl try to ask Turner to run more of the wide open offense and Turner will be learning on the job again because he ran mostly QB draws the previous year.
What did Brandon have to lose by letting Turner run the "Omar" offense? What, we goiing to only win three games instead of four? We wasted a entire year on the young people we have on the offensive side of the ball. Did any of our young wiide receivers get any real experience running the spread offense so they can step up next year and be our next Sharon or Sanders? Hardly!
I blame all this on the head coach. Is he so worried about an extra win or two to keep his job? That reminds my of the Knute Cooper years in Columbus.
A couple more thoughts...
Punting Formation - Enough is enough! Even when the kid gets off a punt he has at least one or two defenders bearing down on him. He hasn't had a kick this year where he didn't have some pressure on him from a rush. Its a bad sign when a coach is so stubborn that he won't change something that is clearly broken. Even if you feel that formation is effective, you have to admit that we don't have the players to execute it properly.
Kick-off Return Team - Why does our kickoff return team always have to struggle to get the ball out to the 20 yard line. Our runner has to start dodging tacklers around the ten or fifteen yard line. Is the problem with our return men or the blocking...or coaching?
Kick-off Coverage Team - Why do we kick it short and give opponents the ball at the 35 yard line on average? I guess we are admitting that Big Bird can't reach the end zone and our coverage team can't tackle. We lose at least 15 yards of field position when we start our offense inside our 20 and opponents start at their 35.
Defense - Yes, the defense played better in stretches this year and we do have a core of young players to work with on that side of the ball. But basically, I saw the same poor tackling defense that we have always had under Brandon. A conservative offense and suspect defense is a bad combination.