Page 1 of 2
MAC teams in the coaches poll.
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:25 pm
by NWLB
Also receiving votes:
Northern Illinois (6-2) 30; South Carolina (5-2) 27; North Carolina State (4-3) 19; Boston College (5-2) 18; Georgia Tech (4-2) 17; Florida (4-3) 14; Texas Tech (4-3) 13; Bowling Green (5-2) 12; Missouri (4-3) 11; Notre Dame (5-3) 11; UAB (5-2) 9; Alabama (5-3) 8; Navy (6-1) 5; Ohio State (4-3) 3; Texas-El Paso (5-2) 3; Marshall (4-3) 2; Pittsburgh (5-2) 1; UCLA (4-3) 1.
Southern Miss has 52 votes, which puts NIU just out of the top 25. They could get ranked before the season is out, assuming they don't lose.
Oh, and note that for all the pointless hype about UT's QB, no votes for them.
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:39 pm
by 1987alum
Message to UT:

Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:59 pm
by BGSUfanatUT
they have votes in AP and we do not though.

Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:23 pm
by UK Peregrine
Oh soup nazi, you're so silly.
The AP poll is always full of crap, go by the coaches poll.
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:26 pm
by BGSUfanatUT
well, both polls are full of crap really, i prefer to make my own poll, since I watch more games that anyone that votes in either poll. And computers cant watch TV, so I am right. Well, at least more right than the BCS rankings.
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:01 pm
by UK Peregrine
BGSUfanatUT wrote:well, both polls are full of crap really, i prefer to make my own poll, since I watch more games that anyone that votes in either poll. And computers cant watch TV, so I am right. Well, at least more right than the BCS rankings.
So could we see your rankings?
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2004 7:55 am
by Dr. Bucko
Yesterday, the AP poll had UT listed above BG. I don't know what the polls will show next week, or three weeks from now, but as of this weekend, comparing apples to apples, BG is clearly the superior team. Is this politics, or did some dummy not do his homework? I'm beginning to believe that the AP is nothing more than a popularity contest.
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2004 8:15 am
by BGSUfanatUT
here ya go UK:
1.Oklahoma
2.NIU
3.Bowling Green
4-118. lots of ppl
119. ohio state
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2004 8:17 am
by BGSUfanatUT
Dr. Bucko wrote:Yesterday, the AP poll had UT listed above BG. I don't know what the polls will show next week, or three weeks from now, but as of this weekend, comparing apples to apples, BG is clearly the superior team. Is this politics, or did some dummy not do his homework? I'm beginning to believe that the AP is nothing more than a popularity contest.
The AP poll has people with John Harris type minds voting. So clearly we can discredit it right away.
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2004 8:54 am
by UK Peregrine
BGSUfanatUT wrote:here ya go UK:
1.Oklahoma
2.NIU
3.Bowling Green
4-118. lots of ppl
119. ohio state
This sounds about right.
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:14 am
by Metz
BGSUfanatUT wrote:here ya go UK:
1.Oklahoma
2.NIU
3.Bowling Green
4-118. lots of ppl
119. ohio state
This season I moved the suckeyes to I-AA so in my rankings, they don't even make the list

My 118 team is turdledo though!!!
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2004 11:29 am
by NWLB
The media types are fixated on UT's QB. Why they are I'm just not able to understand. Indeed, if you actually watch their games, I can't understand why anybody expects them to have a chance against Miami or NIU. Their first play on offense against OU: a safety. Their vaunted offense can't move anyplace against CMU, a game they were truly lucky to win at all. They were utterly dominated and shut-down in their first two games. They are consistently giving up more points against common opponets than BG or others. The teams they've beaten all are sub-.500 programs. But gosh darn, their QB completes such a high percentage of his passes!
Bruce Gradkowski
Oh boy, you found the marble in the oatmeal! You know what that means, you get to drink from the fire hose! --Bruce Grodowski
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2004 11:38 am
by UK Peregrine
NWLB wrote:
Oh boy, you found the marble in the oatmeal! You know what that means, you get to drink from the fire hose! --Gruce Grodowski
Outstanding quote (Stanley Spadowski). I love that movie.
"BADGERS!!!.......We don't need NO stinking badgers!!!!
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2004 5:17 pm
by NWLB
Yeah.
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:31 pm
by Cork
NWLB wrote:The media types are fixated on UT's QB. Why they are I'm just not able to understand. Indeed, if you actually watch their games, I can't understand why anybody expects them to have a chance against Miami or NIU. Their first play on offense against OU: a safety. Their vaunted offense can't move anyplace against CMU, a game they were truly lucky to win at all. They were utterly dominated and shut-down in their first two games. They are consistently giving up more points against common opponets than BG or others. The teams they've beaten all are sub-.500 programs. But gosh darn, their QB completes such a high percentage of his passes! i
I don't get what the voters are looking at. I had to look up the stats. This really surprised me...home game...homecoming...
Team Stats........CMI........TOL
First Downs.........24......... 23
Rushes-Yds.....42-168....32-123
Passing Yds........385........375
Sacked-Yds Lost..2-12.......0-0
Return Yds............0..........82
Passes...........29-42-0....29-42-1
Punts..............6-39.7.....5-33.8
Fumbles-Lost......1-1.........1-0
Penalties-Yds...12-103......7-50
Time Of Poss.....30:22.....29:38
However, if they can beat NIU (on an off game) they could get really motivated for their season finale.