80 ain't bad...

[Ohiogal]

http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/story/7310 ... &GT1=10539

[Falcon137]

I put 0 stock in those rankings after a saw 1-5 ND ahead of us....they beat a UCLA team that was down to thier Walk-on freshman QB. I'm convinced they drew names out of a hat after 3....BC at 11 what a joke...

[BGFootball]

http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/story/7310 ... &GT1=10539

whatever...I completely disregarded everything that was written on there when I read this about why Boston Colleges ranking should be better...

"The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... there might not be a more complete team in the nation. All the parts are working from a ball-hawking defense, to Matt Ryan and the offense. Everything clicked against Bowling Green. Of course …."

[transfer2BGSU]

The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... you don't struggle that much with Eastern Michigan and stay in the top 25. The Wolverines should probably be ranked in the mid-30s.

Then why did he rank them in the top 25? Michigan has to beat OSU for me to move them back into the top 25. Big Eleven is not a strong conference this year and the loss to I-AA App. State means Michigan needs a signature win.

Marshall is 0-5 and ranked 116. That move to C-USA looks really good right now, doesn't it?

MAC Schools
80. Bowling Green (3-2)
82. Central Michigan (3-3)
85. Akron (3-3)
86. Miami University (3-3)
87. Ball State (3-3)
90. Western Michigan (2-4)
92. Kent State (3-3)
97. Toledo (2-4)
103. Buffalo (2-4)
105. Eastern Michigan (2-4)
106. Ohio (2-4)
113. Temple (1-5)
115. Northern Illinois (1-5)

[h2oville rocket]

http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/story/7310 ... &GT1=10539

You only say that because YOU'RE not eighty, you young whippersnapper. Oh, wait, I see...read the Link, Dave, read the link.

[mmisbg]

In all fairness to the numbnuts who are doing the rankings, this is a very difficult year to assess teams.

Outside of LSU, I don't think any of the top ten teams are playing at a level that would put them in the top ten most years.