Ay-Ziggy-Zoomba.com

I put 0 stock in those rankings after a saw 1-5 ND ahead of us....they beat a UCLA team that was down to thier Walk-on freshman QB. I'm convinced they drew names out of a hat after 3....BC at 11 what a joke...

Ohiogal wrote:http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/story/7310 ... &GT1=10539

whatever...I completely disregarded everything that was written on there when I read this about why Boston Colleges ranking should be better...

"The Ranking Should Be Higher Because ... there might not be a more complete team in the nation. All the parts are working from a ball-hawking defense, to Matt Ryan and the offense. Everything clicked against Bowling Green. Of course …."

The Ranking Should Be Lower Because ... you don't struggle that much with Eastern Michigan and stay in the top 25. The Wolverines should probably be ranked in the mid-30s.

Then why did he rank them in the top 25? Michigan has to beat OSU for me to move them back into the top 25. Big Eleven is not a strong conference this year and the loss to I-AA App. State means Michigan needs a signature win.

Marshall is 0-5 and ranked 116. That move to C-USA looks really good right now, doesn't it?

MAC Schools
80. Bowling Green (3-2)
82. Central Michigan (3-3)
85. Akron (3-3)
86. Miami University (3-3)
87. Ball State (3-3)
90. Western Michigan (2-4)
92. Kent State (3-3)
97. Toledo (2-4)
103. Buffalo (2-4)
105. Eastern Michigan (2-4)
106. Ohio (2-4)
113. Temple (1-5)
115. Northern Illinois (1-5)

Ohiogal wrote:http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/story/7310 ... &GT1=10539

You only say that because YOU'RE not eighty, you young whippersnapper. Oh, wait, I see...read the Link, Dave, read the link.

In all fairness to the numbnuts who are doing the rankings, this is a very difficult year to assess teams.

Outside of LSU, I don't think any of the top ten teams are playing at a level that would put them in the top ten most years.