Page 1 of 2
Official Eugene Jarvis over/under thread
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:48 am
by Schadenfreude
Meet Eugene Jarvis. He's just 5 foot 5, a buck seventy -- but he's making opposing defenses miserable every chance he gets.
http://www.kentstatesports.com/fls/1140 ... m#IGBG.RSH
How many yards will he rush for Saturday?
I say 190.
What say you?
Re: Official Eugene Jarvis over/under thread
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:49 am
by hammb
I'll definitely take the over. He averaged over 5 ypc against the Buckeyes. If our defense plays anything like they did last week he could average over 10 ypc.
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:10 am
by BGorDeath
I'll say 210. The ghost of Chester Taylor lives.
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:25 am
by Flipper
IIRC, we offered that kid and pulled it...as did everyone else (maybe academics?)...and he wound up at Kent initially as a preferred walk on.
Looks like he's turned ito a very dangerous back...Garret Wolfe part deaux?
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:39 am
by Falcon137
Way over 225
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:48 am
by Jacobs4Heisman
Too many.
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:48 am
by Flipper
whoops...forgot to say....under, 186
Re: Official Eugene Jarvis over/under thread
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:58 am
by 1987alum
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:02 am
by Zom
UNder. Evidently tweaks a hamstring on his way to the stadium on game day, misses game, to discover his hamstring was fine all long. Everyone wins. Except Kent State.
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:06 am
by tiznow
He will run for his weight. That is not to say, another back may also go over 100

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:16 am
by Warthog
32 carries, 233 yards, 4 tds.
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 12:14 pm
by Falconfreak90
As one of the eternal optimists, I'll say under.
But he can rush for 500 yards for all I care as long as BG wins the game.
GO FALCONS
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 12:17 pm
by TG1996
Flipper wrote:IIRC, we offered that kid and pulled it...as did everyone else (maybe academics?)...
The brief Googling I didn't show much, other than we were interested (along with a few other MAC schools, Pitt and WVU), and that before he picked a school, he was an academic question, afterwards, and now that he's running for 150 a game, it all was because of his size... revisionist history is awesome stuff.
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 12:54 pm
by 1987alum
Falconfreak90 wrote:As one of the eternal optimists, I'll say under.
But he can rush for 500 yards for all I care as long as BG wins the game.
GO FALCONS
Yeah, they can have more yards, control the clock and win the turnover battle as long as BG has more points!
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 1:07 pm
by Warthog
TG1996 wrote:Flipper wrote:IIRC, we offered that kid and pulled it...as did everyone else (maybe academics?)...
The brief Googling I didn't show much, other than we were interested (along with a few other MAC schools, Pitt and WVU), and that before he picked a school, he was an academic question, afterwards, and now that he's running for 150 a game, it all was because of his size... revisionist history is awesome stuff.
He obviously did not fit our system. We do not recruit RBs that don't fit our system. Oh wait, sorry Mr. Bullock. I didn't see you sitting over there on the bench.