Page 1 of 2
Whatifsports.com 2003 Falcons vs. 2004 Falcons
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:28 pm
by NYFalcon
A buddy of mine and I were arguing which team was better...the '03 BG Football Team or the '04 BG Football team. Why? Becasue there is NOTHING going on in sports and I can't hear any more about the Mitchell investigation.
I think the '03 team was far better and my buddy disagreed.
Anyway, I went on whatifsports.com and put in both teams. '04 was home and '03 was away. The '04 team won 4 out of 5 games. Shocking but interesting.
Pretty cool way to spend an hour or so putting BG against all other Div. 1 teams. If you want the best results, but in the '04 team at home. The best team I saw we beat on this website was the '07 Florida Gators.
I can't believe the '04 team was better!!!!
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:43 pm
by BGSUFootballFan
The 2003 team was defn better. Sure is fun to think about though. I agree with you about the Mitchell report. I was already burned out on baseball, now I just feel like vomiting. GIVE ME FOOTBALL!
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:52 pm
by BGSUFootballFan
I simulated us vs. Tulsa 3 times and we won each time...
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 4:58 pm
by zeket10
All things point to a GMAC bowl championship to me.
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 7:11 pm
by BGSUFootballFan
Well then I did 2003 BG vs 2003 Purdue and it came out 47-0 Purdue. This thing is not as cool as I orginally had hoped!
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 8:51 pm
by Tricky_Falcon
2004 Falcons 27
2007 Buckeyes 10
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:50 am
by eRichFalcon
Thanks to whoever started this thread, I will get no sleep tonight....great..
BTW, OSU's chances in the natinonal championship look good, and im pretty sure the '85 Bears would take it to the '72 Dolphins
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:35 am
by rc_ziggy84
Tricky, before I had read your post i did the same thing and got
2004 BGSU 30
2007 OSU 19
I'd like to think that would actually happen too. The stats seem pretty accurate I'd have to say.
None the less, I still agree that our '03 team was better than our '04 team.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 9:54 pm
by Falconfreak90
I'd take our 03 team over the 04...but not by much. I think the 03 team was a bit better.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:00 pm
by BGSUFootballFan
Our 2004 team may have had better talent, but our 2003 team was clearly the better T-E-A-M to me. Those kids were winners, especially J5.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:32 pm
by The Niz
Falconfreak90 wrote:I'd take our 03 team over the 04...but not by much. I think the 03 team was a bit better.
It comes down to this:
Harris > Omar
Both were incredible but Josh had "it"
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:28 pm
by BGSUFootballFan
J5 defn had "it" aka leadership & clutchness, but Omar is the most accurate QB that I've ever been luckily enough to see play.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:19 pm
by Jacobs4Heisman
simulations can't take "it" into account. To a machine, the '04 team would look much better.
I'll take '03.
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 5:04 am
by reyray82
how about '05 with a healthy Omar? hmmm... but I still say '03 with Harris
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:32 am
by hammb
reyray82 wrote:how about '05 with a healthy Omar? hmmm... but I still say '03 with Harris
That '05 team was disappointing and dreary well before Omar got hurt.
The only time all year that they looked like the team we expected was the first half of the Wisconsin game. After that they played well below their talent level even before Omar got hurt.