EMBARASING!!!!!!!

Discussion of the Falcon football team.
Post Reply
Falconboy
John Lovett's Successor
John Lovett's Successor
Posts: 5357
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Columbus
Contact:

EMBARASING!!!!!!!

Post by Falconboy »

I can't believe UT find a way to beat the vaunted NIU rushing attack ,and at NIU's place!! :shock: With there very young defensive line I thought for sure NIU should roll over them easily. This makes our loss to them hurt even more. UT's D is suppused to be porous, what the heck!! On a side note, Garret Wolf did not play due to a punch in the eye he got for breaking up a fight. :? Very interesting. :?
Mid-2000's Anderson Animal
factman
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 4495
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:53 pm
Location: Bowling Green
Contact:

Post by factman »

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
User avatar
Redwingtom
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 5251
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:16 pm

Post by Redwingtom »

You answered your own question...Wolfe
Redwingtom
User avatar
TG1996
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 12708
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 3:27 am
Location: Indianapolis
Contact:

Post by TG1996 »

factman wrote::roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
and four from me, too...

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
User avatar
kdog27
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 7154
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:35 pm
Location: Alabama

Post by kdog27 »

Toledo was the better team with or without Wolffe. ....We are a lot better of a team now
User avatar
Flipper
The Global Village Idiot
The Global Village Idiot
Posts: 18317
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:01 am
Location: Ida Twp, MI

Post by Flipper »

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

I can do five.....
Tricky_Falcon
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 2951
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:23 pm
Location: The State of Bowling Green

Post by Tricky_Falcon »

Learn to spell...oh yeah and quit your bitching. We are all mad we lost to NIU.
User avatar
Falcon Fanatic
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 6798
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:23 pm
Location: BG

Post by Falcon Fanatic »

Tricky_Falcon wrote:Learn to spell...oh yeah and quit your bitching. We are all mad we lost to NIU.
What he said.
"Regarding BGSU, I would think their biggest strength is that they never give up, They never slow down and they battle hard even after the other team scores. We have to be on our game and never, ever take the foot off the gas for a second."
~~USCHO Poster
"BG was relentless. It's like they know that a good first pass on the breakout from a defenseman will almost always result in an odd-man rush against them - but they go in anyway and dare you to make that pass. All three of their goals were just grit and effort. That's a team any fan can be proud to support...they give all they've got."
~~USCHO Poster, AFTER Tech beat us
#NeverGiveUp
#NeverSurrender
#Relentless
#Resiliant
HuskieDan
Egg
Egg
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:45 pm

Post by HuskieDan »

kdog27 wrote:Toledo was the better team with or without Wolffe. ....We are a lot better of a team now
If we played O like we have all year, with our without Wolfe, we would have won. We were 21 points under our average on O, and we've scored points with relative ease all year long. Our senior QB wasn't very good, and UT took advantage of that by stacking the line and stuffing the run. We played lousy, and UT played pretty well.

13-19 on third downs and 42 minutes of TOP really help your cause.
User avatar
kdog27
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 7154
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:35 pm
Location: Alabama

Post by kdog27 »

HuskieDan wrote:
kdog27 wrote:Toledo was the better team with or without Wolffe. ....We are a lot better of a team now
If we played O like we have all year, with our without Wolfe, we would have won. We were 21 points under our average on O, and we've scored points with relative ease all year long. Our senior QB wasn't very good, and UT took advantage of that by stacking the line and stuffing the run. We played lousy, and UT played pretty well.

13-19 on third downs and 42 minutes of TOP really help your cause.
I feel your pain, we felt similar after playing you guys. I hope we keep playing each other.
Cork
Chick
Chick
Posts: 204
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 12:34 am
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA

Post by Cork »

HuskieDan wrote:
kdog27 wrote:Toledo was the better team with or without Wolffe. ....We are a lot better of a team now
If we played O like we have all year, with our without Wolfe, we would have won. We were 21 points under our average on O, and we've scored points with relative ease all year long. Our senior QB wasn't very good, and UT took advantage of that by stacking the line and stuffing the run. We played lousy, and UT played pretty well.

13-19 on third downs and 42 minutes of TOP really help your cause.

Wait a minute Dan! I thought it was silly to think we could beat NIU now? Matter of fact, I though you were just looking down your nose at us last week. What's up?
Cork
Chick
Chick
Posts: 204
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 12:34 am
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA

Post by Cork »

Tricky_Falcon wrote:Learn to spell...oh yeah and quit your bitching. We are all mad we lost to NIU.

:lol: :lol: :partyman: :lol: :lol:

The spelling thing is starting to catch on!
Falconboy
John Lovett's Successor
John Lovett's Successor
Posts: 5357
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Columbus
Contact:

Huh?

Post by Falconboy »

Wait didn't the play action pass work against UT's secondary? Gosh , it seems to burn us every time. What is UT's secondary better than ours, if it is yikes!! :shock: I really thought there was no way that UT beats NIU the way they manhandled us. :? Especially at NIU.
Mid-2000's Anderson Animal
HuskieDan
Egg
Egg
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:45 pm

Post by HuskieDan »

Cork wrote:Wait a minute Dan! I thought it was silly to think we could beat NIU now? Matter of fact, I though you were just looking down your nose at us last week. What's up?
The point was never that we are better than you. The point of your argument was irrelevant, as NIU and BG would not play again. And UT's win over us does not mean that you would beat us today -that's an extrapolation with only one criteria, and it simply isn't valid.

I know that BG and NIU playing any day would be a good game. UT and NIU should have been a better game, but I just don't think our team reacted to adversity very well, and I think a lot of that had to do with the loss of Wolfe - not that having him on the field would have been the difference, but I saw a panic in our team when things didn't go our way, I really thought the being let down by Wolfe's mistake started to weigh on them as things went against us. Heck, we could have been up 10 to start the second half but missed a wide open bomb on the first play.

The point was never that BG isn't as good as NIU. The point is that your comments about BG playing better than NIU right now is irrelevant. I do hope you're right, though, because if we beat EMU and you win @ UT, we go to the title game! :lol:

BTW - congrats on dominating the Herd like I had hoped. I just wish you would have run up the score! :twisted:
HuskieDan
Egg
Egg
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:45 pm

Re: Huh?

Post by HuskieDan »

falconboy wrote:Wait didn't the play action pass work against UT's secondary? Gosh , it seems to burn us every time. What is UT's secondary better than ours, if it is yikes!! :shock: I really thought there was no way that UT beats NIU the way they manhandled us. :? Especially at NIU.
The difference is that our run wasn't working in the second half, while it worked very well in our game against BG. It's tough to defend that team when you're trying so hard (usually in vain) to stop the run.

UT's worked on us so well because we struggled to stop their running game. It's a great play action play because all the action goes one way and you go the exact opposite way.

BTW - NIU shoudl have been up 10 at the beginning of the second half off that exact same play action bootleg. Haldi didn't take the easy TE for 5+ yards, he held on to it a little longer and had Sheldon wide open on the bomb and overthrew it.
Post Reply