UT Penalized 6 football scholarships; BG Soccer .84
Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 1:37 pm
Home of Falcon Fans Online!
https://www.ay-ziggy-zoomba.com/phpBB3/
https://www.ay-ziggy-zoomba.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=20109
Hopefully not.TG1996 wrote:Crap. I had 7 and the over.
Is .84 of a scholarship anything like the average family having 2.5 kids? And, in light of this news, can the men's soccer team still use the Fieldhouse?
Originally posted by TG1996:
Crap. I had 7 and the over.
Is .84 of a scholarship anything like the average family having 2.5 kids? And, in light of this news, can the men's soccer team still use the Fieldhouse?
And the men's soccer team using the Fieldhouse would be a problem ... why?Originally posted by bgsufalcon24:
Hopefully not.
Please, please, PLEASE don't get us started down that path again.threestooges wrote:
Originally posted by TG1996:
Crap. I had 7 and the over.
Is .84 of a scholarship anything like the average family having 2.5 kids? And, in light of this news, can the men's soccer team still use the Fieldhouse?And the men's soccer team using the Fieldhouse would be a problem ... why?Originally posted by bgsufalcon24:
Hopefully not.
...that nobody said there was?tekekini wrote:There is no Ohio State on that list.
What do you have to say for yourselves?
+ 1 trillionPeregrinner wrote:Please, please, PLEASE don't get us started down that path again.threestooges wrote:
Originally posted by TG1996:
Crap. I had 7 and the over.
Is .84 of a scholarship anything like the average family having 2.5 kids? And, in light of this news, can the men's soccer team still use the Fieldhouse?And the men's soccer team using the Fieldhouse would be a problem ... why?Originally posted by bgsufalcon24:
Hopefully not.
Knowing that British soccer players are generally about .84 as good as their counterparts elsewhere, it probably follows that BGSU will have to look for a British player to qualitatively handicap the value of that scholarship. The NCAA will be happy.TG1996 wrote:Is .84 of a scholarship anything like the average family having 2.5 kids?
They have the "resources" available to assure that every athlete passes their classes.tekekini wrote:There is no Ohio State on that list.
What do you have to say for yourselves?
No doubt ... talk about a huge loophole. If the schools cook up some sort of vague plan and show incremental progress, suddenly, they get a free pass.redskins4ever wrote:Well when you are able to have the NCAA wave a Magic Wand and say its ok to be below 925 on sports, there were quite a few BCS schools that got free passes, because they showed "Progress". What a load of bull.
This is true however Ohio State was not one of those schools, they came in comfortably above the cutoff at 942. If we had the APR back in the 90's I wonder where they would've come in? I'd say toward the late 90's they'd have struggled to come in at much over 900 with players like Reggie Germany sporting his Blutarski-esk GPA.1987alum wrote:No doubt ... talk about a huge loophole. If the schools cook up some sort of vague plan and show incremental progress, suddenly, they get a free pass.redskins4ever wrote:Well when you are able to have the NCAA wave a Magic Wand and say its ok to be below 925 on sports, there were quite a few BCS schools that got free passes, because they showed "Progress". What a load of bull.