Home of Falcon Fans Online!
https://www.ay-ziggy-zoomba.com/phpBB3/
https://www.ay-ziggy-zoomba.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=36524
Well… someone’s gonna have to fill the void on ESPN.Flipper wrote: ↑Thu Aug 18, 2022 4:10 pm Seven years...between seven and eight billion dollars total across multiple platforms (CBS, Fox, NBC, Peacock streaming and of course...the BTN) Each school is set to receive $80-100 million per year.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/s ... ox-cbs-nbc
But...yeah...we're playing at the same level they are
Yep. On top of that fans of MAC programs will have to sign up for Peacock and Paramount Plus to watch any non-conference games vs. B1G.
I think it's great. We are the only football games in the country two nights a week every November, and the biggest brand in sports television pays the MAC millions of dollars for the right to broadcast them nationally.
Meh. The MAC sold their soul, and they're fortunate that ESPN has begun cozying up to the sports wagering industry or else I feel the relationship would be in trouble. The midweek games pull in decent enough ratings (around 1M viewers for the marquee matchups) and a large chunk of those viewers are folks with money on the game. The product as a whole is mediocre and probably wouldn't be surviving long term without that.Schadenfreude wrote: ↑Fri Aug 19, 2022 10:50 amI think it's great. We are the only football games in the country two nights a week every November, and the biggest brand in sports television pays the MAC millions of dollars for the right to broadcast them nationally.
There's apparently a clause for Notre Dame. If they join within the next 7 years the price goes up.Falconwriter wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 1:31 pm This deal will end up being much more with the additions of USC and UCLA -- and the very distinct possibility there will be more schools added as the birth of (at least) two super conferences happens in the next year.
I'd be shocked if the B1G is giving ND 7 years to decide. They simply won't increase the income of the league that much -- and they aren't members of the AAU, which the B1G has required to maintain billions in research grants to its members. If I were the conference, I'd give ND a year to decide, then tell them to go pound salt...and I wouldn't allow the conference to schedule them, either.Tricky_Falcon wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 1:44 pmThere's apparently a clause for Notre Dame. If they join within the next 7 years the price goes up.Falconwriter wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 1:31 pm This deal will end up being much more with the additions of USC and UCLA -- and the very distinct possibility there will be more schools added as the birth of (at least) two super conferences happens in the next year.
I saw it several places yesterday. Here's what I just found: https://twitter.com/PeteSampson_/status ... C-7WZcn9DwFalconwriter wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 3:12 pmI'd be shocked if the B1G is giving ND 7 years to decide. They simply won't increase the income of the league that much -- and they aren't members of the AAU, which the B1G has required to maintain billions in research grants to its members. If I were the conference, I'd give ND a year to decide, then tell them to go pound salt...and I wouldn't allow the conference to schedule them, either.Tricky_Falcon wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 1:44 pmThere's apparently a clause for Notre Dame. If they join within the next 7 years the price goes up.Falconwriter wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 1:31 pm This deal will end up being much more with the additions of USC and UCLA -- and the very distinct possibility there will be more schools added as the birth of (at least) two super conferences happens in the next year.
My hope is that expansion somehow brings in Georgia Tech and Virginia or UNC and Duke. I'd also invited Arizona and Colorado, so the Big Ten would have a footprint from coast to coast in contiguous states. Remember, it's TV markets that bring in the money. GT brings in Atlanta, Virginia has DC, Arizona has Phoenix and Tucson, and Colorado would add Denver. All of those are top 20 (or close) markets.
Anything that is quoted from Twitter I take with a huge salt mine (grains of salt are too small). I honestly doubt that the expanding of the B1G into a super conference is going to last over a 7 year period.Tricky_Falcon wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 9:41 pmI saw it several places yesterday. Here's what I just found: https://twitter.com/PeteSampson_/status ... C-7WZcn9DwFalconwriter wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 3:12 pmI'd be shocked if the B1G is giving ND 7 years to decide. They simply won't increase the income of the league that much -- and they aren't members of the AAU, which the B1G has required to maintain billions in research grants to its members. If I were the conference, I'd give ND a year to decide, then tell them to go pound salt...and I wouldn't allow the conference to schedule them, either.Tricky_Falcon wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 1:44 pmThere's apparently a clause for Notre Dame. If they join within the next 7 years the price goes up.Falconwriter wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 1:31 pm This deal will end up being much more with the additions of USC and UCLA -- and the very distinct possibility there will be more schools added as the birth of (at least) two super conferences happens in the next year.
My hope is that expansion somehow brings in Georgia Tech and Virginia or UNC and Duke. I'd also invited Arizona and Colorado, so the Big Ten would have a footprint from coast to coast in contiguous states. Remember, it's TV markets that bring in the money. GT brings in Atlanta, Virginia has DC, Arizona has Phoenix and Tucson, and Colorado would add Denver. All of those are top 20 (or close) markets.
For me as well. Tough to get there by kickoff when you're 2.5 hours away and kickoff is at 7. I don't like being in an empty stadium on mid week games, either.jpfalcon09 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 19, 2022 11:20 amMeh. The MAC sold their soul, and they're fortunate that ESPN has begun cozying up to the sports wagering industry or else I feel the relationship would be in trouble. The midweek games pull in decent enough ratings (around 1M viewers for the marquee matchups) and a large chunk of those viewers are folks with money on the game. The product as a whole is mediocre and probably wouldn't be surviving long term without that.Schadenfreude wrote: ↑Fri Aug 19, 2022 10:50 amI think it's great. We are the only football games in the country two nights a week every November, and the biggest brand in sports television pays the MAC millions of dollars for the right to broadcast them nationally.
As a season ticket holder I just hate the fact that there might be a game or two I can't attend due to work or family commitments.