Page 1 of 1
2005 Marshall Schedule
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 11:21 am
by Anonymous
And they believe this is a tougher schedule then playing the likes of:
Toledo, Northern Illinois, BG and Miami. I think it is pretty weak.
The 2005 Marshall Football Schedule
Thursday, Sept. 1 William & Mary
Saturday, Sept. 10 Kansas State
Saturday, Sept. 24 at UCF
Saturday, Oct. 1 Southern Methodist (SMU)
Saturday, Oct. 8 at Virginia Tech
Saturday, Oct. 15 UAB
Saturday, Oct. 22 at UTEP
Saturday, Oct. 29 at Tulane
Tues. or Wed., Nov. 8/9 Southern Miss
Saturday, Nov. 19 East Carolina
Saturday, Nov. 26 at Memphis
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 11:28 am
by UK Peregrine
They're out of the MAC, who really cares. Marshall can have their ConvictUSA.
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 11:34 am
by GoFalcons4
William and Mary is tough.
Re: 2005 Marshall Schedule
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 11:46 am
by 1987alum
bgsufan1972 wrote:And they believe this is a tougher schedule then playing the likes of:
Toledo, Northern Illinois, BG and Miami. I think it is pretty weak.
The 2005 Marshall Football Schedule
Thursday, Sept. 1 William & Mary
Saturday, Sept. 10 Kansas State
Saturday, Sept. 24 at UCF
Saturday, Oct. 1 Southern Methodist (SMU)
Saturday, Oct. 8 at Virginia Tech
Saturday, Oct. 15 UAB
Saturday, Oct. 22 at UTEP
Saturday, Oct. 29 at Tulane
Tues. or Wed., Nov. 8/9 Southern Miss
Saturday, Nov. 19 East Carolina
Saturday, Nov. 26 at Memphis
Out of fairness to the Blundering Turd, let's give this a real look.
Their 2005 schedule includes UTEP, Tulane, Southern Miss, East Carolina, Memphis, Cincinnati. UTEP looked awful good last year; USM was a top 25 team for much of last year; Cincy, though I wasn't terribly impressed, was a bowl team and appears to be improving; we all know what Memphis is capable of. Tulane and East Carolina stink.
Their 2004 MAC schedule included Miami, Ohio, Kent State, Buffalo, Akron, BG and Western Michigan.
Miami won the division, BG had a great year and Akron had a winning record. Ohio was, at best, below averge while Buffalo and Western Michigan were terrible.
Have to say their 2005 schedule looks better. BTW, Marshall played five bowl-bound teams in 2004 (Troy, Georgia, Ohio State, Miami, BG), in addition to bowl-eligible Akron.
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 11:47 am
by 1987alum
As for William & Mary, let's not forget our recent tussles with SEMO State, Liberty and Eastern Kentucky.
Re: 2005 Marshall Schedule
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 11:54 am
by UK Peregrine
1987alum wrote:
Out of fairness to the Blundering Turd, let's give this a real look.
87, these words don't belong in the same sentence. It just doesn't make sense to me.

Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 12:04 pm
by 1987alum
Yeah, the term "mutually exclusive" comes to mind!

Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 12:39 pm
by Lord_Byron
C'mon guys, it's not like they're playing just William or just Mary, they're playing both William AND Mary.
As tough as they are individually, think how mean they are when they are together.
Re: 2005 Marshall Schedule
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 1:07 pm
by FormerFreddie
"Have to say their 2005 schedule looks better. BTW, Marshall played five bowl-bound teams in 2004 (Troy, Georgia, Ohio State, Miami, BG), in addition to bowl-eligible Akron"
And lost to all of them but Miami. 1-4 vs. Bowl teams, 1-5 if you count Cincinnati. Beat up on the weaklings and came up short against quality competition. Sounds awfully "Clarett-esque."
So not counting the win vs. Miami, they beat Ohio (4-7), Kent (5-6) , Buffalo (2-9), UCF (0-11). and WMU (1-10). A combined record of 12-43. If this were the NCAA hoops tourney, they'be be staying home.
Re: 2005 Marshall Schedule
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 2:07 pm
by 1987alum
FormerFreddie wrote:"Have to say their 2005 schedule looks better. BTW, Marshall played five bowl-bound teams in 2004 (Troy, Georgia, Ohio State, Miami, BG), in addition to bowl-eligible Akron"
And lost to all of them but Miami. 1-4 vs. Bowl teams, 1-5 if you count Cincinnati. Beat up on the weaklings and came up short against quality competition. Sounds awfully "Clarett-esque."
So not counting the win vs. Miami, they beat Ohio (4-7), Kent (5-6) , Buffalo (2-9), UCF (0-11). and WMU (1-10). A combined record of 12-43. If this were the NCAA hoops tourney, they'be be staying home.
Brian:
If you re-read my post, I don't think you'll find any attempt on my part to say they did well against their schedule, nor that they had a great team. I am merely commenting on their schedule.
As for this comment ...
Beat up on the weaklings and came up short against quality competition.
The Glass House discussion goes like this ...
BG went 7-3 in the 2004 regular season against D-IA opponents.
Record against teams with winning records: 1-3 (including Marshall)
Record against teams with losing records: 6-0
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 5:14 pm
by FormerFreddie
Point taken.
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 5:19 pm
by golfertk14
ur a former freddie?? awesome!!
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 9:37 pm
by 1987alum
FormerFreddie wrote:Point taken.
And, all things considered, I'm glad they've gone to C-DOA!

Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 9:53 pm
by cowboyjoe
The Glass House discussion goes like this ...
BG went 7-3 in the 2004 regular season against D-IA opponents.
Record against teams with winning records: 1-3 (including Marshall)
Record against teams with losing records: 6-0
At least we have no 63-14 or 63-21 losses out of those 3 losses like that team up north....maybe we should have and Brandon would have received coach of the year in Ohio instead of fatso. I keep telling people eventually they will turn his headset on so he can hear what's going on and get it off of 92.5 FM.
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 10:37 pm
by NY-BG-FAN
Playing William & Mary is really like playing a lower 1-A team. They went very deep in the 1-AA playoffs, and nearly beat North Carolina at the beginning of last season, and they went on to a bowl so.