Page 1 of 2
Linebackers
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 9:00 am
by Salsa
Can somebody explain the "names" for the linebackers--WILL, SAM, MLB (middle line backer?)?.
By explain, I mean where each is positioned, their different responsibilities, and the different skills required for each one.
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 9:08 am
by orangeandbrown
I believe WILL is weak side linebacker (W) and SAM is the strong side linebacker (S).
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 9:10 am
by Flipper
This is a link to a great site for info on defensive strategy. Here's an explanantion of what everyone does in a basic 4-3 defense (what we usually run)
http://letstalkdefense.com/43defense.html
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 8:29 pm
by saves
WILL=weakside LB
SAM= strongside LB
MIKE= middle LB
Just shorthand terms. Makes it easier to say
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 9:00 pm
by Metz
Why do I have to be in the middle?

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 9:35 pm
by TG1996
McMetz811 wrote:Why do I have to be in the middle?

Because.... ahhh, no comment.

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 9:54 pm
by BGDrew
That's ok, the one in the middle doesn't have to do as much work. Just got to make sure your keeping an eye on your tight end.
Hm, never realized football covered such sexual references....
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:03 pm
by golfertk14
TG1996 wrote:McMetz811 wrote:Why do I have to be in the middle?

Because.... ahhh, no comment.

Stuck in the middle....isn't that a song?

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:36 pm
by Metz
BGDrew wrote:That's ok, the one in the middle doesn't have to do as much work. Just got to make sure your keeping an eye on your tight end.
Hm, never realized football covered such sexual references....
The 'Tight End' aka my cornhole will always be covered when I'm in between 2 other guys my size!
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:23 am
by BGDrew
I hear ya, don't want your tight end to become a wide receiver.
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:45 am
by kdog27
I stumbled on the wrong thread.
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 6:57 am
by Rightupinthere
Flipper wrote:This is a link to a great site for info on defensive strategy. Here's an explanantion of what everyone does in a basic 4-3 defense (what we usually run)
http://letstalkdefense.com/43defense.html
Good link Flip.
By the descriptions they make it sound like each of the LB's have similar responsibilities and therefore need similar talents. However, I always thought that the WILL and SAM needed to have better speed than the MIIKE becasuse they are assisting more on covering wide receivers. Am I wrong on that?
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 8:18 am
by 1987alum
Rightupinthere wrote:Flipper wrote:This is a link to a great site for info on defensive strategy. Here's an explanantion of what everyone does in a basic 4-3 defense (what we usually run)
http://letstalkdefense.com/43defense.html
Good link Flip.
By the descriptions they make it sound like each of the LB's have similar responsibilities and therefore need similar talents. However, I always thought that the WILL and SAM needed to have better speed than the MIIKE becasuse they are assisting more on covering wide receivers. Am I wrong on that?
Rightupinthere:
My take has always been (bear in mind these are broad generalizations) ...
MIKE: Run-stopper. Speed not the main criterion here. Sure tackler and it's a real plus if they are a big hitter.
WILL: Quickest of the three linebackers.
SAM: Best athlete - strong enough to fight off extra blockers, quick enough to cover backs & tight ends.
Mmm... wich brings me to....
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:57 pm
by Falconboy
Our starting linebackers as of late. Especially the SAM or WILL postions we've had a 5'11 215 pounder at that postion , how does that equate to being able to cover a running back that might go 225 or more or a TE??

We must insert size into this years starting linebackers.
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 1:03 pm
by 1987alum
Falconboy:
We've been over this territory many times and I don't think anyone has changed their opinion. Lighter and quicker are the keywords for Beckman's defense. Whether that's good or bad, well, we'll have to see. But adding size isn't necessarily going to make difference. The problem is probably as much schematic as it is phsyical.