Ay-Ziggy-Zoomba.com

Nice!!!!!!

yes we had a bad QB last year

yes we went 4-12

yes our coach had a breakdown and left the team

BUT THIS IS OUR YEAR!!

It's that Cleveland-fan in me that keeps me believin'..

Yeah, that's just sweet, right there!!

Boy, he looks a lot smaller on an NFL field.

Great pic, hammb! J5!

those are all great, thanks... i cant wait to see him in action during the pre-season

u can check him out in the mini-camp video at clevelandbrowns.com

theres not much of him in the video, but it shows him running a couple plays

Schadenfreude wrote:Boy, he looks a lot smaller on an NFL field.

That's probably the biggest reason he dropped in the draft. By NFL standards he is short for a QB. He's built like a rock though, so I think he can take the pounding. The Browns have done a LOT this offseason to improve the OL, but if they aren't vastly better than last year's group the ability to take a hit is key to all Cleveland QBs

Cleveland Browns 2005: A New Hope

hammb wrote: That's probably the biggest reason he dropped in the draft. By NFL standards he is short for a QB. He's built like a rock though, so I think he can take the pounding. The Browns have done a LOT this offseason to improve the OL, but if they aren't vastly better than last year's group the ability to take a hit is key to all Cleveland QBs

I figured you took a picture of me at work the other night and uploaded here hammb...got my hopes up!

Metz wrote:

hammb wrote: That's probably the biggest reason he dropped in the draft. By NFL standards he is short for a QB. He's built like a rock though, so I think he can take the pounding. The Browns have done a LOT this offseason to improve the OL, but if they aren't vastly better than last year's group the ability to take a hit is key to all Cleveland QBs

I figured you took a picture of me at work the other night and uploaded here hammb...got my hopes up!

I could've taken some pictures that were a beautiful sight up there, but you would not have been the subject of them.

hammb wrote:I could've taken some pictures that were a beautiful sight up there, but you would not have been the subject of them.

What? You mean Danica Patrick was present and you did not snap any photos? What were you thinking, or should I say NOT thinking.

bgsufan1972 wrote:

hammb wrote:I could've taken some pictures that were a beautiful sight up there, but you would not have been the subject of them.

What? You mean Danica Patrick was present and you did not snap any photos? What were you thinking, or should I say NOT thinking.

You know, I thought she was kinda hot, but nothing special. Then I saw the cover of last week's Sports Illustrated. She looks like she has some serious man-hands. No thank you, the racing world can keep her. There are much better looking women who actually participate in real sports