Page 1 of 2
Trev Alberts and my Wisconsin experience
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 9:57 pm
by BGorDeath
Yes, it was disappointing that we lost to Wisconsin, but the most aggravating time of the weekend for me was making the mistake listening to Trev Alberts. Why does he have a job? I just don't understand how this arrogant prick keeps a job. Every time he opens his mouth, I believe I see Satan's face in there. I get tired of pointing out what he says to make me think this, so I won't burden anyone because I am sure you have heard it too.
Trev Alberts is a douche bag.
Thanks for listening. That was cathartic.
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 10:04 pm
by Tricky_Falcon
yeah but he was right at the half saying that Wisconsin would wear us down and run all over us the second half.
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 10:06 pm
by BGorDeath
Tricky_Falcon wrote:yeah but he was right at the half saying that Wisconsin would wear us down and run all over us the second half.
His still a douche bag. I believe "Meadow Fields" scent.
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 10:15 pm
by Tricky_Falcon
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 12:21 am
by Warthog
Actually, the correct nickname for Trev as established a few weeks back is douche
monkey 
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 12:27 am
by Bleeding Orange
Warthog wrote:Actually, the correct nickname for Trev as established a few weeks back is douche
monkey
Boy, if there is one thing I hope to see before I die, its a meadow fields scented douchemonkey!
Hmmm....I wonder if Tucson has a zoo...
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 11:32 pm
by CapitalFalcon
Bleeding Orange wrote:Boy, if there is one thing I hope to see before I die, its a meadow fields scented douchemonkey!
What do you mean??? Just tune into ESPN every weekend!
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 11:34 pm
by Jacobs4Heisman
actually I believe Trev Alberts smells of elderberries.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 7:44 am
by redskins4ever
You can add Craig James to that list as well as Lee Corso....
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:58 am
by CapitalFalcon
In association with my other post, what has our team done to show Alberts, Corso, etc. that we are more than just another Mid-Major?
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 11:27 am
by BGorDeath
CapitalFalcon wrote:In association with my other post, what has our team done to show Alberts, Corso, etc. that we are more than just another Mid-Major?
My original post was in regard to Mr. Douche Bag (he is no longer Trev Alberts to me). My opinion of Mr. Douche Bag has nothing to do with his opinions of BG. I just think Mr. Douche Bag is an arrogant prick and what spews forth from his pie hole is nothing but garbage. 90% of what he says is degrading to whoever he is spewing about. I do not understand why he has a job at ESPN. I find him utterly useless, yet I can't look away from this train wreck of an announcer.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 11:30 am
by It's the Journey...
Originally posted by CapitalFalcon:
In association with my other post, what has our team done to show Alberts, Corso, etc. that we are more than just another Mid-Major?
Well, we haven't done anything this year to show we are anything more than a mid-major program. We went into a Big Ten stadium and watched our defence give the game away because our cordinator can't make adjustments. Until we start playing a COMPLETE game of football we will have to deal with their impressions of us.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:37 pm
by transfer2BGSU
It's the Journey... wrote:We went into a Big Ten stadium and watched our defence give the game away because our cordinator can't make adjustments.
WAIT A MINUTE!
Are you blaming the defensive COORDINATOR? Novel concept - placing the defensive responsibilities on the defensive coordinator. Not too bad there Lyons (for a Poli Sci grad).
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:41 pm
by 1987alum
I'll say this, as an amateur student of the game ...
1) Our defense didn't seem to change much after the first half. Spielman noted that he wouldn've liked to have seen some stunts up front, which make sense given the amount of bulk we were giving up at the point of attack. Our linebacker appeared to be playing a straight read and react drop instead of swarming to the ball consistently. That clearly wasn't working, so adjustments were in order.
2) The above being said, I'm more distressed at the players who didn't make plays when they appeared to be in a position to do so.
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:44 pm
by kdog27
1987alum wrote:2) The above being said, I'm more distressed at the players who didn't make plays when they appeared to be in a position to do so.
Same here, I knew they would be able to run on us but I am really upset that the tackling problems have not changed a bit. I thought this new DC would stress things like that. Calhoun will break 99/100 arm tackles. On so many plays I thought we were going to stick them for minimal gain but...