Page 1 of 1
OT Rules Question
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 8:47 am
by Dayons_Den
So watching the Ohio U. and Pitt game last night had one of my long time OT questions answered.
I always wondered what would happen in a "top of the inning" type situation of the defending team returned a ball for a t.d. I wondered if the "home team" (Ohio U. n this case) would have to go out and down the ball four times. It kind of makes sense that they would have to, giving the other defense (Pitt) an opportunity to make a play or cause a fumble or a bad snap or whatever. This rings true in a game where all the points were either ST or defensivescores.
But, I guess it would be odd to have to go out and down it or whatever. Just a thought on OT though.
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:01 am
by Warthog
Hmmm, Good point DD. Wouldn't it be correct to allow Pitt the chance of creating a turnover as well? They didn't get their chance to score on defensive.
Actually, I was wondering if returning it would count. I thought maybe it was like an XP in the NFL. If you turn the ball over, it is dead and we start over with the other team getting the ball.
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:03 am
by orangeandbrown
Wouldn't OU have just taken a knee four times in that situation?
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:22 am
by transfer2BGSU
Yeah, you take the knee. But the defensive linemen on the other team are swatting at the ball as its being hiked and all sorts of things to create a fumble and a (slim)chance to return it.
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:48 am
by Schadenfreude
I thought of that, too. If the rules were strictly fair, Ohio should have had to go out and down it.
But realistically, the game was over. The rules are probably best as they are written.
nope
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:22 am
by jerzyboy247
They wouldn't need to play the four downs because OT is put in a situation for the offense to score not the defense. Plus if the ball was somehow recovered by the defense they would need to score on that play or else the game is over. OT works out as possesion game as one team gets the ball then the other team gets the ball after the drive. So the answer is no, OU would not need to play the four downs.
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:27 am
by BGDrew
Nope. In OT the first team to score is the winner, irregardless who's on offense.
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 12:19 pm
by Schadenfreude
BGDrew wrote:Nope. In OT the first team to score is the winner, irregardless who's on offense.
How much college football have you watched? :coo-coo:
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 12:28 pm
by BGDrew
Re-reading that, it came across that I claimed it was NFL style. I know teams take turns, but the first team to score with the offense/defense switch wins.
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 12:43 pm
by TG1996
BGDrew wrote:I know teams take turns, but the first team to score with the offense/defense switch wins.
Unless the first team with the ball scores on offense, then the other team gets their set of downs. Of course.
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 12:51 pm
by BGDrew
Of course.
Don't mistake NFL and College
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 4:39 pm
by jerzyboy247
Yo Schadenfreude, you seemed to mistake your rules for college football. Both teams get at least a chance to score. Not first team to score wins. No sudden death in college football and to give you an example of overtime look back and remember the 2003 Fiesta Bowl Ohio St. vs. Miami (FL).
Re: Don't mistake NFL and College
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 4:50 pm
by TG1996
jerzyboy247 wrote:and to give you an example of overtime look back and remember the 2003 Fiesta Bowl Ohio St. vs. Miami (FL).
I'll prefer a different example of overtime in CFB, thank you.
http://bgsufalcons.collegesports.com/sp ... 02aaa.html
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 7:37 pm
by BG_Kiwi
Schadenfreude wrote:BGDrew wrote:Nope. In OT the first team to score is the winner, irregardless who's on offense.
How much college football have you watched? :coo-coo:
And how much time have you spent in college? "Irregardless" is not a word. (Though "irrespective" and "regardless" both are.)